Council Agenda
27 April 2022
![]() |
ALL INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN VARIOUS FORMATS ON REQUEST
CITY OF BUSSELTON
MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA – 27 April 2022
TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS
NOTICE is given that a meeting of the Council will be held in the Council Chambers, Administration Building, Southern Drive, Busselton on Wednesday, 27 April 2022, commencing at 5.30pm.
Your attendance is respectfully requested.
DISCLAIMER
Statements or decisions made at Council meetings or briefings should not be relied on (or acted upon) by an applicant or any other person or entity until subsequent written notification has been given by or received from the City of Busselton. Without derogating from the generality of the above, approval of planning applications and building permits and acceptance of tenders and quotations will only become effective once written notice to that effect has been given to relevant parties. The City of Busselton expressly disclaims any liability for any loss arising from any person or body relying on any statement or decision made during a Council meeting or briefing.
oliver darby
ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|
14 April 2022
Agenda FOR THE Council MEETING TO BE HELD ON 27 April 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM NO. SUBJECT PAGE NO.
1....... Declaration of Opening, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY and Announcement of Visitors
4....... Application for Leave of Absence
5....... Disclosure Of Interests
6....... Announcements Without Discussion
7....... Question Time For Public
8....... Confirmation and Receipt Of Minutes
8.1 Minutes of the Council Meeting held 13 April 2022
8.2 Minutes of the Behaviour Complaints Commitee Meeting held 13 April 2022
8.3 Minutes of the Finance Committee Meeting held 13 April 2022
9....... RECEIVING OF Petitions, Presentations AND DEPUTATIONS
10..... QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN (WITHOUT DISCUSSION)
11..... Items brought forward for the convenience of those in the public gallery
12.1 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE - FEBRUARY 2022
12.4 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - RATE EXEMPTION APPLICATION - SOUTH METROPOLITAN YOUTH LINK INC
12.6 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR PERCENT FOR ART
13..... Planning and Development Services Report
14..... Engineering and Work Services Report
15..... Community and Commercial Services Report
16..... Finance and Corporate Services Report
16.1 ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE AND ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING DATES
17..... Chief Executive Officers Report
17.1 COUNCILLORS INFORMATION BULLETIN
18..... Motions of which Previous Notice has been Given
Council 6 27 April 2022
1. Declaration of Opening, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY and Announcement of Visitors
Nil
4. Application for Leave of Absence
6. Announcements Without Discussion
Announcements by the Presiding Member
Response to Previous Questions Taken on Notice
Public Question Time For Public
8. Confirmation and Receipt Of Minutes
8.1 Minutes of the Council Meeting held 13 April 2022
That the Minutes of the Council Meeting held 13 April 2022 be confirmed as a true and correct record. |
8.2 Minutes of the Behaviour Complaints Commitee Meeting held 13 April 2022
Recommendation That the Minutes of the Behaviour Complaints Committee Meeting held 13 April 2022 be noted.
|
8.3 Minutes of the Finance Committee Meeting held 13 April 2022
That the Minutes of the Finance Committee Meeting held 13 April 2022 be noted. |
9. RECEIVING OF Petitions, Presentations AND DEPUTATIONS
10. QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN (WITHOUT DISCUSSION)
11. Items brought forward for the convenience of those in the public gallery
Council 7 27 April 2022
12.1 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE - FEBRUARY 2022
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.2 Deliver governance systems that facilitate open, ethical and transparent decision making. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Financial Operations |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Financial Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Manager Financial Services - Paul Sheridan |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services – Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Noting: The item is simply for information purposes and noting |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Simple Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment a List
of Payments - February 2022⇩ |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council notes the payment of voucher numbers for the month of February 2022 as follows:
|
That the Council notes the payment of voucher numbers for the month of February 2022 as follows:
CHEQUE PAYMENTS |
119146 - 119177 |
15,584.05 |
ELECTRONIC TRANSFER PAYMENTS |
85168 - 85461 and 85465 - 85798 |
6,065,325.53 |
TRUST ACCOUNT |
EFT # 85462 - 85464 |
22,930.56 |
PAYROLL PAYMENTS |
01.02.22 - 28.02.22 |
1,632,262.10 |
INTERNAL PAYMENT VOUCHERS |
DD004757- DD004792 |
129,831.83 |
TOTAL PAYMENTS |
7,865,934.07 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides details of payments made from the City’s bank accounts for the month of February 2022, for noting by the Council and recording in the Council Minutes.
BACKGROUND
The Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (the Regulations) requires that, when the Council has delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to make payments from the City’s bank accounts, a list of payments made is prepared each month for presentation to, and noting by, the Council.
OFFICER COMMENT
In accordance with regular custom, the list of payments made for the month of February 2022 is presented for information.
Statutory Environment
Section 6.10 of the Local Government Act 1995 and more specifically Regulation 13 of the Regulations refer to the requirement for a listing of payments made each month to be presented to the Council.
Relevant Plans and Policies
There are no relevant plans or policies to consider in relation to this matter.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications associated with the officer recommendation.
Stakeholder Consultation
No external stakeholder consultation was required or undertaken in relation to this matter.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
Not applicable.
CONCLUSION
The list of payments made for the month of February 2022 is presented for information.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Council 37 27 April 2022
12.2 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - FINANCIAL ACTIVITY STATEMENTS - YEAR TO DATE AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2022
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.2 Deliver governance systems that facilitate open, ethical and transparent decision making. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Financial Services |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Financial Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Manager Financial Services - Paul Sheridan |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services – Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Simple Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment a Loan Schedule -
February 2022⇩ Attachment b Financial
Activity Statement - February 2022⇩ Attachment c Investment
Report - February 2022⇩ |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council receives the statutory financial activity statement reports for the period ending 28 February 2022, pursuant to Regulation 34(4) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996. |
That the Council receives the statutory financial activity statement reports for the period ending 28 February 2022, pursuant to Regulation 34(4) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pursuant to Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) and Regulation 34(4) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 (the Regulations), a local government is to prepare, on a monthly basis, a statement of financial activity that reports on the City’s financial performance in relation to its adopted / amended budget.
This report has been compiled to fulfil the statutory reporting requirements of the Act and associated Regulations, whilst also providing the Council with an overview of the City’s financial performance on a year to date basis, for the period ending 28 February 2022.
BACKGROUND
The Regulations detail the form and manner in which financial activity statements are to be presented to the Council on a monthly basis, and are to include the following:
· Annual budget estimates
· Budget estimates to the end of the month in which the statement relates
· Actual amounts of revenue and expenditure to the end of the month in which the statement relates
· Material variances between budget estimates and actual revenue/expenditure (including an explanation of any material variances)
· The net current assets at the end of the month to which the statement relates (including an explanation of the composition of the net current position)
Additionally, and pursuant to Regulation 34(5) of the Regulations, a local government is required to adopt a material variance reporting threshold in each financial year. At its meeting on 26 July 2021, the Council adopted (C2107/140) the following material variance reporting threshold for the 2021/22 financial year:
That pursuant to Regulation 34(5) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations, the Council adopts a material variance reporting threshold with respect to financial activity statement reporting for the 2020/21 financial year as follows:
· Variances equal to or greater than 10% of the year to date budget amount as detailed in the Income Statement by Nature and Type/Statement of Financial Activity report, however variances due to timing differences and/or seasonal adjustments are to be reported only if not to do so would present an incomplete picture of the financial performance for a particular period; and
· Reporting of variances only applies for amounts greater than $25,000.
OFFICER COMMENT
In order to fulfil statutory reporting requirements and to provide the Council with a synopsis of the City’s overall financial performance on a year to date basis, the following financial reports are attached hereto:
Statement of Financial Activity
This report provides details of the City’s operating revenues and expenditures on a year to date basis, by nature and type (i.e. description). The report has been further extrapolated to include details of non-cash adjustments and capital revenues and expenditures, to identify the City’s net current position; which reconciles with that reflected in the associated Net Current Position report.
Net Current Position
This report provides details of the composition of the net current asset position on a full year basis, and reconciles with the net current position as per the Statement of Financial Activity.
Capital Acquisition Report
This report provides full year budget performance (by line item) in respect of the following capital expenditure activities:
· Land and Buildings
· Plant and Equipment
· Furniture and Equipment
· Infrastructure
Reserve Movements Report
This report provides summary details of transfers to and from reserve funds, and associated interest earnings on reserve funds, on a full year basis.
Additional reports and/or charts can be provided as required to further supplement the information comprised within the statutory financial reports.
Comments on Financial Activity to 28 February 2022
The Statement of Financial Activity (FAS) for the year to date (YTD) shows an overall Net Current Position of $14.5M as opposed to the budget of $2.7M. This represents a positive variance of $11.9M YTD.
The following table summarises the major YTD variances that appear on the face of the FAS, which, in accordance with Council’s adopted material variance reporting threshold, collectively make up the above difference. Each numbered item in this lead table is explained further in the report.
Description |
2021/22 $ |
2021/22 $ |
2021/22 $ |
2021/22 % |
2021/22 $ |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Revenue from Ordinary Activities |
1.28% |
931,891 |
117,402 |
|||
1. Other Revenue |
511,965 |
232,567 |
414,950 |
120.14% |
279,398 |
113,586 |
Expenses from Ordinary Activities |
|
7.22% |
4,095,270 |
253,165 |
||
2. Materials & Contracts |
(10,746,248) |
(12,093,462) |
(20,345,296) |
11.14% |
1,347,214 |
109,916 |
3. Other Expenditure |
(2,115,578) |
(4,069,278) |
(9,685,100) |
48.01% |
1,953,700 |
157,177 |
4. Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies and Contributions |
1,850,609 |
9,657,655 |
34,850,687 |
(80.84%) |
(7,807,046) |
(713,168) |
Capital Revenue & (Expenditure) |
26.28% |
11,031,813 |
(8,593,546) |
|||
5. Land & Buildings |
(1,858,670) |
(14,548,613) |
(22,802,632) |
87.22% |
12,689,943 |
648,916 |
Plant & Equipment |
(835,516) |
(2,025,000) |
(2,890,000) |
58.74% |
1,189,484 |
171,406 |
Furniture & Equipment |
(180,767) |
(549,191) |
(828,800) |
67.08% |
368,424 |
(5,676) |
Infrastructure |
(11,992,351) |
(22,101,394) |
(38,537,750) |
45.74% |
10,109,042 |
(335,372) |
6. Proceeds from Sale of Assets |
28,839 |
634,278 |
776,071 |
(95.45%) |
(605,439) |
(57,878) |
7. Proceeds from New Loans |
10,075,000 |
15,450,000 |
25,450,000 |
(34.79%) |
(5,375,000) |
(9,950,000) |
8. Total Loan Repayments – Principal |
(1,615,120) |
(1,848,193) |
(3,839,418) |
15.32% |
233,073 |
0 |
9. Repayment Capital Lease |
(442,654) |
(365,278) |
(489,199) |
(21.18%) |
(77,376) |
(100,406) |
10. Advances to Community Groups |
(75,000) |
(5,450,000) |
(5,450,000) |
98.62% |
5,375,000 |
(50,000) |
11. Transfer to Restricted Assets |
(19,672,505) |
0 |
(10,021,740) |
(100.00%) |
(19,672,505) |
(2,562,249) |
12. Transfer from Restricted Assets |
5,197,680 |
0 |
1,735,682 |
100.00% |
5,197,680 |
2,143,258 |
13. Transfer from Reserves |
4,663,076 |
3,076,832 |
39,544,446 |
51.55% |
1,586,244 |
1,584,503 |
Revenue from Ordinary Activities
In total, revenue from Ordinary Activities is very close to budget at only 1.28% ahead YTD. There is however a material variance item requiring comment.
1. Other Revenue
Ahead of YTD budget by $279K, or 120.14%, mainly due to the items listed in the table below:
Revenue Code |
Revenue Code Description |
Actual YTD $ |
Amended Budget YTD $ |
Variance |
Variance |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Finance & Corporate Services |
52,567 |
46,440 |
6,127 |
13.19% |
(25,343) |
|
10360 |
Customer Services – Sale of Number Plates |
9,818 |
2,520 |
7,298 |
289.61% |
(840) |
This is not an area that is easy to predict based on historical trends. This financial year there has been a spike in people wishing to acquire personalised plates. |
||||||
Planning and Development Services |
72,978 |
85,066 |
(12,088) |
(14.21%) |
(2,681) |
|
10950 |
Animal Control – Prosecutions |
15,529 |
22,868 |
(7,339) |
(32.09%) |
(2,244) |
Difficult to predict, but may have been contributed to by improved public compliance coupled with a shift in focus away from prosecution toward education. |
||||||
10970 |
Parking Control – Parking Fines & Costs |
22,147 |
26,774 |
(4,627) |
(17.28%) |
(1,155) |
Difficult to predict, but may have been contributed to by improved public compliance coupled with a shift in focus away from prosecution toward education. |
||||||
Engineering and Works Services |
384,097 |
97,641 |
286,456 |
293.38% |
157,786 |
|
12642 |
NCC Standpipe – Sale of Water |
25,396 |
9,073 |
16,323 |
179.90% |
14,019 |
Sales are based on meter readings for water taken from the standpipe. Over summer there was considerably more volume taken than was originally budgeted. |
||||||
G0030 & G0031 |
Busselton & Dunsborough Transfer Station – Sale of Scrap Materials |
357,070 |
88,568 |
268,502 |
303.16% |
134,694 |
Prices received for scrap metal have been favourable – up to $220/tonne received in July, $255/tonne received in November, and $265/tonne in January and February for major collections, compared to $110-$140/tonne during 2020. |
Expenses from Ordinary Activities
Expenditure from ordinary activities is $4.1M, or 7.2%, less than expected when compared to the budget YTD as at February. The expense line items on the face of the financial statement that have a YTD variance that meet the material reporting threshold are outlined below.
2. Materials & Contracts
Less than YTD budget by $1.35M. The main contributors to this variance are listed in the table below:
Cost Code |
Cost Code Description |
Actual YTD $ |
Amended Budget YTD $ |
Variance |
Variance |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Finance and Corporate Services |
1,126,656 |
1,488,419 |
361,763 |
24.3% |
15,757 |
|
10151 |
Rates Administration |
142,906 |
185,425 |
42,519 |
22.9% |
11,317 |
Variation between YTD actual and budget is mainly due to: · Postage $19.3K under budget due to instalment notice postage invoice having not been processed plus cost savings by using a new printing service for final and reminder notices. · Bank charges $32.5K under budget as the charges have come a lot less than expected. · Legal expenses $20.2K over budget due to a substantial increase in debt recovery proceedings. This expenditure is fully recovered from the property owner/s. · Consultancy $9K under budget due to the rating review project that this budget is for only just now commencing. There will be under underspend in this area offset by a possible overspend in wages, as an internal resource has been seconded to the project to help defray external consulting costs. |
||||||
10250 |
Information & Communication Technology Services |
551,010 |
667,023 |
116,013 |
17.4% |
39,126 |
Most of this budget relates to software licence renewals and subscriptions paid in advance. The monthly allocation of the annual budget was set based on an historical 4 year monthly cash payment trend. This will not necessarily align on a monthly basis with the new prepaid expenses allocation process that has been adopted to more accurately reflect proper accrual accounting practices, however it should resolve by year end. In the month of February there was also a relocation of bank charges from IT to Finance to incorrect postings associated with the new Securepay service. |
||||||
10360 |
Customer Service |
9,269 |
23,874 |
14,605 |
61.2% |
3,777 |
Most of the variance is due to a lower spend on stationery. Difficult to predict monthly spend due to orders being made on an ‘as required’ basis |
||||||
10500 |
Legal and Compliance Services |
55,563 |
82,096 |
26,533 |
32.3% |
7,704 |
The variance YTD relates predominantly to the unspent budgeted amount for external legal services. It is not possible to predict when or to what extent legal services will be required at the time of setting the budget, therefore the annual allocation is spread evenly over the year. |
||||||
10510 |
Governance Support Services |
18,377 |
75,697 |
57,320 |
75.7% |
9,069 |
The underspend is mainly due to a number of software licenses for programs used in the Governance area not as yet being renewed. When paid, the cost for these will be spread over the term of the license, so timing differences to the budget (set based on historical cash trend), will persist. |
10616, 10617, & 10618 |
Aged Housing |
44,527 |
112,338 |
67,811 |
60.4% |
7,174 |
Works are carried out throughout the year and generally need to coincide with vacancies. Property inspections are to be undertaken at which time items requiring maintenance will be identified. Therefore timing of expenditure is dependent on the vacancies. |
||||||
R0288 |
Locke Estate |
4,281 |
17,336 |
13,055 |
75.3% |
2,167 |
Likely spend from remaining budget will be between $4-8k depending on whether and when sites are leased. |
||||||
R0305 |
Creekview Road Reserve 12492 (Lot 501) |
- |
14,868 |
14,868 |
100.0% |
296 |
Due to a controlled burn, certain activities such as targeted flora and fauna surveys have not been able to be conducted. Alternative animal monitoring and habitat surveys are now planned to be undertaken by the end of the financial year, however there still should be an overall underspend of approximately $7K. |
||||||
Community and Commercial Services |
1,110,305 |
1,910,458 |
800,153 |
41.9% |
210,591 |
|
10380 & 10381 |
Busselton & Dunsborough Libraries |
69,970 |
129,567 |
59,597 |
46.0% |
(3,144) |
The variances YTD mainly arise in relation to the cost of Computer Software Licences used at the libraries being spread over the period they relate to, rather than when the cash is outlaid, which is how the budget was allocated. |
||||||
10540 |
Recreation Administration |
(155) |
51,887 |
52,042 |
100.3% |
214 |
YTD expenses are well below Budget figures as the Consultancy works for the Bovell Ovals Masterplan and Dunsborough Country Club Masterplan are only in the early stages. It is expected that the work should be completed by years end. |
||||||
10543 |
Community Development |
926 |
100,075 |
99,149 |
99.1% |
- |
This relates to the Strengthening Communities program funded by Lotterywest. There were delays in the program development, and procurement has not yet taken place. It is anticipated that this program will be now be launched during February with bulk of expenditure to occur through March and April. |
||||||
10590 |
Naturaliste Community Centre |
37,549 |
55,357 |
17,808 |
32.2% |
(5,947) |
The under spend here is as a result of Non-Capital Furniture & Office Equipment, Contractors and Licence Fees – this has been due to controlled spending and invoice timing. There was also an increased budget in F&OE this year is as result of grant monies received, which are planned to be expended by the end of the financial year. |
||||||
10600 |
Busselton Jetty Tourist Park |
314,500 |
389,821 |
75,321 |
19.3% |
2,119 |
The YTD variance is mainly due to the monthly payment of the Park Management Contract being one month in arrears. By end of financial year this expenditure catches up, as June will be accrued, however the budget timing does not reflect this. |
||||||
10625 |
Art Geo Administration |
48,370 |
68,265 |
19,895 |
29.1% |
354 |
The underspend at ArtGeo is offset in wages i.e. where staff have the skills to deliver the service we use them and not contractors as it achieves better outcomes. Also, some activities were postponed or deferred due to the relocation. |
||||||
10630 |
Economic and Business Development Administration |
23,485 |
147,447 |
123,962 |
84.1% |
51,594 |
The majority of the budgeted spend is allocated in Consultancy, and with ED team not resourced at this time, tasks involving the engagement of consultants have been deferred to later in the financial year. |
||||||
10900 |
Cultural Planning |
4,580 |
22,112 |
17,532 |
79.3% |
(1,071) |
Awaiting confirmation of further grant monies before engagement of consultants. |
||||||
11151 |
Airport Operations |
142,284 |
470,309 |
328,025 |
69.7% |
17,231 |
YTD variances are mainly due to: · Airport screening services – allocated monthly amounts have been delayed until flights start. · Planned consultancy tasks not started. · A number of contractor invoices having not been received. · Underspends in Contract building cleaning costs & fire safety materials (due to delay in commencement of RPT services). |
||||||
B1361 |
YCAB (Youth Precinct Foreshore) |
33,787 |
51,899 |
18,112 |
34.9% |
(860) |
Purchase of planned minor equipment has been delayed, due to delay in construction of The Break. We also are experiencing a reduction in uptake of the Upskills Youth Program, due to COVID in the community, which has resulted in less expenditure than planned. |
||||||
Planning and Development Services |
661,796 |
522,853 |
(138,943) |
(26.6%) |
(160,466) |
|
10801 |
Sustainability |
110,217 |
79,974 |
(30,243) |
(37.8%) |
(110,036) |
Savings in capital projects in a related area will offset this negative variance. A budget amendment will be processed in the coming months to formally move these savings to align against this area. |
||||||
10805 |
Planning Administration |
5,707 |
27,926 |
22,219 |
79.6% |
3,478 |
Computer software license renewals have either not as yet been received, so no allocations for these costs have occurred, or those that have, have been spread over the term of the licence rather than all in one hit at time of payment. |
||||||
10820 |
Strategic Planning |
41,792 |
104,990 |
63,198 |
60.2% |
11,019 |
The variance YTD is essentially due to holistic Consultancy budget being allocated across the 12-month period. Strategic Planning is subject to competing demands and project prioritisation (also timing delays etc. due to consultancy periods, peak authority feedback or processes and lack of availability on occasion of specialised consultant assistance). Appointment of consultants or other anticipated strategic expenditures are always difficult to predict on that basis. |
||||||
10925 |
Preventative Services - CLAG |
79,200 |
60,100 |
(19,100) |
(31.8%) |
- |
The CLAG budget is fully reconciled with the Shire of Capel after the mosquito season each year. This will occur circa February and all changes made accordingly by the EOFY each year. |
||||||
10931 |
Protective Burning & Firebreaks-Reserves |
212,437 |
42,535 |
(169,902) |
(399.4%) |
(27,232) |
The YTD variance is in line with DFES Mitigation Activity Grant Funding of $500,000 being received and spent over the 2021/22 FY. YTD Budget does not reflect the grant funding received. |
||||||
10935 |
Fire Fighting Council Component |
27,047 |
- |
(27,047) |
(100.0%) |
(27,047) |
Fire Fighting Council Component is not something that is planned or budgeted for. Expenditure here represents cost that were incurred as part of the Council’s contribution to the emergency response to the Dunsborough fires. |
||||||
10950 |
Animal Control |
25,069 |
36,776 |
11,707 |
31.8% |
(2,545) |
The variance YTD relates to the timing of for the purchase of dog bags of dog bags ($6k per delivery) – two more pallets and additional dispensers required prior to end of financial year. |
||||||
Various |
Bushfire Brigades |
61,219 |
26,813 |
(34,406) |
(128.3%) |
(8,682) |
Funding is from DFES ESL Local Government Grant Scheme funding and is spent according to operational needs of the City’s Bushfire Brigades and SES. Spending will be above historical levels due to a busier than average 2021/22 fire season. |
Engineering and Works Services |
7,847,165 |
8,167,897 |
320,732 |
3.9% |
43,698 |
|
10830 |
Environmental Management Administration |
91,581 |
161,350 |
69,769 |
43.2% |
101,287 |
The underspend relates to a number of outstanding proposed consultancy items which will be delivered in the 4th quarter totalling $65K. These include; dieback mapping, visitor access study, weed mapping. Further materials commitments in 3rd and 4th quarter of $65K for street trees stakes, guards, bollards and fencing. Commitments for yearly maintenance works are awaiting to be completed and invoiced over the third and fourth quarter. |
||||||
11170 |
Meelup Regional Park |
73,496 |
166,858 |
93,362 |
56.0% |
11,179 |
The recreation reserve maintenance budget was spread evenly across the year and thus does not reflect seasonally impacted expenditure patterns. To this end, planning is underway for the noxious weed control program and works associated with the Healthy Countries Plan. $63K in works have been committed representing works that are now underway or will commence shortly. Further expenditure is expected for works for post fire remedial action. |
||||||
11160, 11161 & 11162 |
Busselton Jetty |
22,892 |
11,714 |
(11,178) |
(95.4%) |
(663) |
In October a compressor and ducted heater was replaced in the UWO. $23k of the annual budget totalling $54k has now been outlaid. This variance is due to timing only. Hoping to claim some of these costs through an insurance claim. |
||||||
12600 |
Street & Drain Cleaning |
241,732 |
253,013 |
11,281 |
4.5% |
(23,817) |
The budget was entered based on historical expenditure and service levels determined by that figure, patterns averaged over the previous three financial years. All of $465k annual budget has been committed based on scheduled maintenance plans, thus the YTD variance is attributable to timing only. |
||||||
12620 & 12621 |
Rural & Urban Tree Pruning |
260,295 |
479,783 |
219,488 |
45.7% |
(13,050) |
This year’s rural tree pruning budget of $352K includes $153K carried over from the previous year. Rural tree pruning works are ordinarily completed in the first half of the year however storm damage clean-up took priority this year. Rural road verges to be pruned are prioritised based on factors including the period of time since last pruned, inspections, volume and types of traffic and many other considerations. Works will now be scheduled outside the fire season. |
||||||
Various |
Building Maintenance |
1,050,708 |
923,435 |
(127,273) |
(13.8%) |
(31,912) |
The budget was entered based on historical expenditure patterns, however this is not reflective of the pattern of costs being incurred this financial year. In past years significant amounts of scheduled maintenance were carried out in the last quarter however this FY it has been evenly expended on a monthly basis YTD. The variance is therefore attributed to timing only. |
||||||
Various |
Waste Services |
1,465,212 |
1,764,729 |
299,517 |
17.0% |
63,737 |
Majority variance of $215K is associated with concrete crushing which is programmed for later in the financial year. $41k of budget underspend is attributable to External Restoration Works associated with the Rendezvous Road remediation sites matter, while a further $43K associated with green waste mulching that has not been invoiced/processed. |
||||||
Various |
Roads Maintenance |
802,300 |
548,124 |
(254,176) |
(46.4%) |
(22,075) |
This budget was entered monthly based on historical expenditure patterns averaged out over the previous three financial years. To this end some of this variance is due to timing. $75k of the variance is attributable to unbudgeted storm damage contractor clean-up costs associated with the City’s road network. These costs are anticipated to moderate somewhat as a large majority of the City’ s Construction and Maintenance crews have switched primarily onto Capital works. |
Various |
Reserves, Parks & POS Maintenance |
1,265,869 |
1,373,882 |
108,013 |
7.9% |
(20,133) |
The underspend to budget YTD on City Parks and Reserves is linked to numerous Cost Codes including; • Dunsborough Lakes Sporting Precinct Ovals / Turf as project not yet handed over by Major Projects. -$58k under budget YTD. • Busselton Foreshore Skate Park. -$32k under due to scheduled non-recurrent concrete maintenance repair not yet undertaken. • Busselton Foreshore Area -$17k under expended as scheduled works to increase after Easter and Events. |
||||||
5280 (GL Activity) |
Transport Fleet Management |
1,214,717 |
1,154,853 |
(59,864) |
(5.2%) |
(19,991) |
Fuel is the most significant overspend ($139k) to end of Feb due to escalating fuel prices and parts the largest underspend ($39k) due to significant delays in receiving orders due to supply chain issues. |
||||||
Various |
Other Infrastructure Maintenance |
1,386,852 |
1,528,404 |
141,552 |
9.3% |
120,755 |
A number of areas are underspent YTD including; Noxious Weeds & Pest Plants, Busselton CBD Maintenance, LED Street Light Replacement Program and Rural Intersection (Lighting) Compliance. These areas will see increased expenditure in the last quarter of the financial year. Foreshore Protection-Dunsborough/Quindalup and Foreshore Protection-Yallingup & Smith budgets are overspent by $247k due to Yallingup beach access stairs that were damaged by winter storms and preventative sand renourishment activities in the Dunsborough region. Corresponding under expenditure is contained within the Capital budget. |
3. Other Expenditure
$1.95M, or 48.01%, under the budget YTD. The main contributing items are listed below:
Cost Code |
Cost Code Description |
Actual YTD $ |
Amended Budget YTD $ |
Variance |
Variance |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Executive Services |
74,992 |
55,336 |
(19,656) |
(35.5%) |
(8,828) |
|
10001 |
Office of the CEO |
33,683 |
55,336 |
21,653 |
39.1% |
4,627 |
The underspend relates to the inter-council initiatives budget line item, which has not been spent to date. |
||||||
10011 |
Emergency Contingency Costs (Other) |
41,309 |
- |
(41,309) |
(100.0%) |
(13,455) |
There is no budget for this particular area, as it is used purely to capture specific unforeseen emergency related costs. YTD actuals represent the costs associated with the forgone rental opportunities at the YCAB, whilst it is being used as a COVID vaccination clinic i.e. effectively tracking this part of the City’s contribution to the vaccination effort. This a non-cash “book entry”, with an offsetting revenue amount shown in Venue Hire income for the YCAB facility. |
||||||
Finance and Corporate Services |
823,726 |
779,631 |
(44,095) |
(5.7%) |
3,084 |
|
10000 |
Members of Council |
436,005 |
497,409 |
61,404 |
12.3% |
2,904 |
Timing related variances with underspends in primarily member allowances and sitting fees ($35k), plus underspends in reimbursements and training expenses due to change of council members. |
||||||
10151 |
Rates Administration |
28,670 |
40,728 |
12,058 |
29.6% |
(5,930) |
The budget is for rating valuations in relation to the interim rating of new properties. It was set as an even monthly spread, as historically these activities are random (e.g. dependant on building completions), and can’t be predicted. As such, there will always be timing variances. |
10200 |
Financial Services |
45,029 |
- |
(45,029) |
(100.0%) |
- |
The budget for the 5 yearly valuation of the City’s Land & Buildings was removed, as at the time of developing the budget it was believed that a qualified in-house valuer would be able to conduct this service. |
||||||
10221, 10227, 10228, 10229 & 10230 |
Finance & Borrowing Programs 4, 11, 12, 13 & 14 |
197,054 |
103,082 |
(93,972) |
(91.2%) |
- |
The Government Guarantee levy on the City’s loans as collected by the WA Treasury Corp payable for the period 1 January to 30 June 2021 was levied in July 2021. This invoice should have been posted to June via an accrual, however it was not completed and instead included in July’s expenses. Accordingly there will be three payments included in 2021/2022’s reports. |
||||||
10511 |
Community Assistance Program (Governance) |
- |
16,666 |
16,666 |
100.0% |
- |
Funds for the You Choose Program yet to be allocated. The full year budget of $100K will be allocated in May / June. |
||||||
Community and Commercial Services |
988,346 |
3,020,299 |
2,031,953 |
67.3% |
181,611 |
|
10532 |
BPACC Operations |
2,860 |
25,000 |
22,140 |
88.6% |
(2,429) |
BPACC operational activity will not commence until 2023. |
||||||
10533 |
Welfare / Senior Citizens |
67,561 |
43,398 |
(24,163) |
(55.7%) |
- |
This is the annual agreed grant paid to the Busselton Senior Citizens centre which is paid quarterly on invoice from the centre. A further invoice (quarterly payment) was recently approved for payment earlier than forecast. |
||||||
10536 |
School Chaplaincy |
- |
41,400 |
41,400 |
100.0% |
- |
This is the annual grant to Youthcare which is paid on invoice. An Invoice for the full amount was approved in December. |
||||||
10543 |
Community Development |
82,486 |
126,735 |
44,249 |
34.9% |
(1,947) |
This relates to the first three rounds of Community Assistance Program. Round 1 and 2 approvals were combined due to Council elections and round 3 closed on 30 November. From the first 3 rounds $133,873 is committed with actual expenditure to be seen in first quarter of 2022. Round 4 has now closed and applications are being assessed. Timing is largely dependent on CAP Applications received from community groups. |
||||||
10558 |
Events |
521,654 |
908,217 |
386,563 |
42.6% |
34,876 |
The YTD underspend to budget can be explained as follows: · To date there have been 8 budgeted events cancelled due to COVID, totaling approximately $71K; · There have been 5 events that have occurred for which the City has yet to be invoiced for their contribution, totaling $57.5K; · 6 events have had partial payments, however a total of $91.5K remains due to milestones not yet met; · A further $166K was forecast to have been incurred by YTD February ($110K for Winter Wonderland, and approximately $56K in general unallocated funds). |
||||||
10630 |
Economic and Business Development Administration |
126,059 |
95,179 |
(30,880) |
(32.4%) |
(41,514) |
This is due to MRBTA visitor servicing invoice which actually gets presented at the beginning of the quarter and not the end where it has been budgeted. |
||||||
10634 |
Business Support Program |
- |
23,850 |
23,850 |
100.0% |
- |
Final acquittals of the support program yet to be received. This budget was carried over from the 20/21 financial year, funded from the MERG Reserve, however it has now been ascertained that only approximately $10,000 will be required. This will more than likely be the positive variance by the end of the year, offset by a lower transfer from the reserve. |
1,992 |
1,533,908 |
1,531,916 |
99.9% |
191,364 |
||
Marketing activities continue to be delayed due to the postponement of Jetstar RPT services as a result of COVID restrictions etc. |
||||||
11156 |
Airport Development Operations |
115,139 |
148,550 |
33,411 |
22.5% |
- |
At the time of setting the budget the timing for the final carried over payments related to a noise mitigation project were not known. $148K was estimated to be remaining in total, split over three payments, however we have not received practical completion on the works, and there are still some outstanding works in progress. |
||||||
Planning and Development Services |
70,117 |
84,682 |
14,565 |
17.2% |
(8,852) |
|
10805 |
Planning Administration |
- |
15,000 |
15,000 |
100.0% |
- |
This budget item relates to the Façade Refurbishment Program which the City normally runs on an annual basis. Due to staff shortages and other priorities this year, it’s not likely that the full year budget of $30K will get spent at all. |
||||||
Engineering and Works Services |
158,398 |
129,330 |
(29,068) |
(22.5%) |
(9,839) |
|
10830 |
Environmental Management Administration |
16,037 |
794 |
(15,243) |
(1919.7%) |
(5) |
Biodiversity Incentive Rate Rebate costs per allocated and paid in January, however the budget of $17,650 is allocated to June. Variance will rectify at year end. |
||||||
B1223 |
Micro Brewery - Public Ablution |
- |
60,000 |
60,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The full contribution of $120K to the ablutions, in two instalments, was made in the 20/21 financial year, however due to the lateness of the second $60K instalment, it was inadvertently included again in the 21/22 year budget unnecessarily. |
||||||
G0042 |
BTS External Restoration Works |
101,812 |
25,000 |
(76,812) |
(307.2%) |
(5,000) |
Rendezvous Road Refuse site remedial works. |
4. Non-Operating Grants, Subsidies & Contributions
The negative variance of $7.8M is mainly due to the items in the table below. It should be noted that any negative variance in this area will approximately correlate to an offsetting positive underspend variance in a capital project tied to these funding sources. This can be seen in the section below that outlines the capital expenditure variances. Where this is not the case, the reconciliation of the projects and the required funding to be recognised in revenue is not completed until closer to year end.
Revenue Code |
Revenue Code Description |
Actual YTD $ |
Amended Budget YTD $ |
Variance |
Variance |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Community and Commercial Services |
- |
115,376 |
(115,376) |
(100.0%) |
- |
|
10540 |
Recreation Administration |
- |
51,250 |
(51,250) |
(100.0%) |
- |
10590 |
Naturaliste Community Centre |
- |
46,700 |
(46,700) |
(100.0%) |
- |
C6010 |
Airport Fencing Works |
- |
17,426 |
(17,426) |
(100.0%) |
- |
Engineering and Works Services |
1,371,648 |
9,477,279 |
(8,105,631) |
(85.5%) |
(1,131,129) |
|
A0014 |
Bussell Highway Bridge – 0241 – Federal Capital Grant |
- |
744,000 |
(744,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
A0022 |
Yallingup Beach Road Bridge - 3347 – Federal Capital Grant |
- |
700,000 |
(700,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
B9407 |
Busselton Senior Citizens – Developer Cont. Utilised |
- |
111,750 |
(111,750) |
(100.0%) |
- |
B9591 |
Performing Arts Convention Centre – Federal Capital Grant |
- |
4,554,000 |
(4,554,000) |
(100.0%) |
(1,138,500) |
B9612 |
Churchill Park Renew Sports Lights – State Capital Grant |
- |
72,850 |
(72,850) |
(100.0%) |
- |
C3116 |
Dawson Park (Mcintyre St Pos) – Developer Cont. Utilised |
71,116 |
- |
71,116 |
100.0% |
- |
C3211 |
Tulloh St (Geographe Bay Road) - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
25,043 |
- |
25,043 |
100.0% |
- |
C3214 |
Kingsford Road - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
71,437 |
- |
71,437 |
100.0% |
- |
C3215 |
Monash Way - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
71,939 |
- |
71,939 |
100.0% |
- |
C3216 |
Wagon Road - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
81,341 |
- |
81,341 |
100.0% |
- |
C3217 |
Limestone Quarry - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
119,687 |
- |
119,687 |
100.0% |
- |
C3218 |
Dolphin Road - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
90,634 |
- |
90,634 |
100.0% |
- |
C3219 |
Kingfish/ Costello - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
33,551 |
- |
33,551 |
100.0% |
- |
C3220 |
Quindalup Old Tennis Courts Site - POS Upgrade – Developer Cont. Utilised |
34,480 |
- |
34,480 |
100.0% |
- |
C3241 |
Vasse River - Ongoing Restoration of River Habitat – State Capital Grant |
- |
90,000 |
(90,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
F0084 |
Thompson Way - New Path - Contributions |
36,818 |
- |
36,818 |
100.0% |
- |
F0112 |
Causeway Road Shared Path – State Capital Grant |
- |
80,000 |
(80,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0048 |
Bussell Highway – Developer Cont. Utilised |
- |
200,000 |
(200,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0076 |
Kaloorup Road (Stage 1) – Main Roads Direct Grant |
- |
224,400 |
(224,400) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0077 |
Ludlow-Hithergreen Stage 2 Reconstruct & Widen – MR Capital Grant |
- |
96,000 |
(96,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0078 |
Sugarloaf Road – State Capital Grant |
- |
321,599 |
(321,599) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0321 |
Yoongarillup Road - Second Coat Seal – MR Capital Grant |
- |
100,000 |
(100,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0331 |
Barracks Drive Spray Seal – MR Capital Grant |
- |
130,980 |
(130,980) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0332 |
Inlet Drive Spray Seal – MR Capital Grant |
- |
47,000 |
(47,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0333 |
Chapman Crescent Spray Seal – MR Capital Grant |
- |
78,000 |
(78,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0334 |
Chapman Hill Road – MR Capital Grant |
- |
748,000 |
(748,000) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0335 |
Kaloorup Road – MR Capital Grant |
- |
240,950 |
(240,950) |
(100.0%) |
- |
S0336 |
Wildwood Road – MR Capital Grant |
- |
937,750 |
(937,750) |
(100.0%) |
- |
5. Capital Expenditure
As at 28th February 2022, there is an underspend variance of 62.1%, or $24.4M, in total capital expenditure, with YTD actual at $14.9M against the YTD budget of $39.2M. A large portion of this positive underspend variance is offset by the negative variance in Non-Operating Grants, Contributions & Subsidies discussed above, with the remainder offset by the negative variances in Transfers From Reserves and Restricted Assets related to funds held aside for these projects. The attachments to this report include detailed listings of all capital expenditure (project) items, however the main areas of YTD variance are summarised as follows:
Cost Code |
Cost Code Description |
Actual YTD $ |
Amended Budget YTD $ |
Variance |
Variance |
Change in Variance Current Month $ |
Land |
2,599 |
33,336 |
30,737 |
92.2% |
4,167 |
|
10610 |
Property Services Administration |
2,599 |
33,336 |
30,737 |
92.2% |
4,167 |
This is a contingency fund for costs associated with land acquisition or disposal under the LTFP, such as advertising costs in relation to the proposed disposition of freehold land holdings at Ambergate. |
||||||
Buildings |
1,856,072 |
14,515,277 |
12,659,205 |
87.2% |
644,749 |
|
B9614 |
Dunsborough Lakes Sporting Precinct-Pavilion /Changeroom Facilities |
11,372 |
483,334 |
471,962 |
97.6% |
203,220 |
There has been minimal expenditure to date as works have not yet commenced. The design is currently under review to achieve budget alignment in consultation with user groups. |
||||||
B9012 |
Civic and Administration Building Replacement of Cladding |
109,370 |
80,000 |
(29,370) |
(36.7%) |
(88,366) |
Cladding replacement only commenced in January, with planned completion toward the end of February/early March. Associated billing from the supplier to follow after that. |
B9300/1/2 |
Aged Housing Capital Improvements |
35,250 |
143,700 |
108,450 |
75.5% |
- |
Budgeted works were proposed to separate the power and drainage that service Winderlup Court and Winderlup Villas. Western Power have now confirmed that separation of power is not required. As there are other works required to these units the proposal is a cap ex spend of circa $28,000 for bathroom upgrades and reflux valves and a possible further $70,000 for replacement carports. |
||||||
B9591 |
Performing Arts Convention Centre |
1,165,841 |
12,331,880 |
11,166,039 |
90.5% |
434,925 |
The contract for construction was awarded to Broad Constructions in late January. Broad took full site possession at the end of January and have commenced investigative works. Unspent budget at June 30 will be carried over into the following financial year. |
||||||
B9596 |
GLC Building Improvements |
78,117 |
142,568 |
64,451 |
45.2% |
(2,950) |
Proposed project for stadium ventilation has been put on hold, pending a review of capital projects. Storage upgrade has commenced. |
||||||
B9605 |
Energy Efficiency Initiatives (Various Buildings) |
90,791 |
137,910 |
47,119 |
34.2% |
- |
Works planned for commencement have encountered delays pending Western Power applications and approvals. Works programmed to be completed by the end of the financial year. |
||||||
B9610 |
Old Butter Factory |
17,991 |
6,000 |
(11,991) |
(199.8%) |
- |
The YTD overspend is due the retention monies owing to the contractor on final completion of project. |
||||||
B9611 |
Smiths Beach New Public Toilet |
- |
250,000 |
250,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Notification has been received by the entity that currently supplies the water that they are no longer able to supply water for City toilets. As such an MOU is being reviewed by the property team to establish viability of infrastructure works and costs for water supply. A clearing permit application is also underway, however all other activity on the project has been put on hold until these issues are resolved. |
||||||
B9612 |
Churchill Park Renew Sports Lights |
73,562 |
212,850 |
139,288 |
65.4% |
- |
RFQ for installation of lights awarded with works to commence in March 2022. |
||||||
B9615 |
Naturaliste Community Centre AMP |
641 |
57,600 |
56,959 |
98.9% |
13,264 |
Delays due to contractor availability, these works will be re listed into next financial year. |
||||||
B9617 |
Buildings AMP Renewal Allocation - Meelup Ablution |
7,389 |
120,000 |
112,611 |
93.8% |
40,000 |
During Budget planning these works were anticipated to be spread evenly over 5 months. Due to unforeseen design complexities the works were not able to start on time. These issues have been resolved and this project will be delivered in this financial year. |
||||||
B9622 |
Dunsborough Youth Centre Building Construction |
15,740 |
- |
(15,740) |
(100.0%) |
- |
The timing for works and initial procurement of a transportable building was not accurately known at the time of setting the original total budget of $80K. |
||||||
B9717 |
Airport Construction - Existing Terminal Upgrade |
- |
46,485 |
46,485 |
100.0% |
6,835 |
Invoicing in relation to the retention monies owing to Pindan (in receivership), for works completed has not yet been received. There is also a budget amount for unforeseen works required to enable RPT services, however this has not as yet been utilised. |
B9720 |
BMRA Hangars |
- |
210,000 |
210,000 |
100.0% |
- |
This is a timing issue - the RFT process closed in January, however negotiations with tenderers are still ongoing. It is hoped that the tender will be awarded in April. |
||||||
B9808 |
Busselton Jetty Tourist Park Upgrade |
4,314 |
25,000 |
20,686 |
82.7% |
- |
Timing Issue - capital works upgrades that cannot be done until after Easter (the tourist season). |
||||||
Plant & Equipment |
835,516 |
2,025,000 |
1,189,484 |
58.7% |
171,406 |
|
10250 |
Information & Communication Technology Services |
- |
40,000 |
40,000 |
100.0% |
40,000 |
Vehicle due to be delivered April. |
||||||
10372 |
Dunsborough Cemetery |
- |
20,000 |
20,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget is for maintenance trailers for the cemetery, both for grave shoring equipment and watering equipment. The delay in procurement of these items is due to current material and supply related issues. |
||||||
10540 |
Recreation Administration |
- |
40,000 |
40,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget relates to a vehicle for the recently created Manager position. Vehicle has been ordered, delivery due in April. |
||||||
10610 |
Property Services Administration |
- |
35,000 |
35,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Vehicle has been ordered, delivery due in April. |
||||||
10630 |
Economic and Business Development Administration |
- |
75,000 |
75,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget relates to the replacement of two vehicles. One vehicle due to be delivered in June. Second vehicle yet to be ordered. |
||||||
10810 |
Statutory Planning |
- |
35,000 |
35,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Vehicle has been ordered, delivery due in April. |
||||||
10920 |
Environmental Health Services Administration |
- |
40,000 |
40,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Vehicle will be ordered when new officer appointed. |
||||||
10950 |
Animal Control |
- |
50,000 |
50,000 |
100.0% |
50,000 |
Ute for rangers to be ordered in April. |
||||||
11001 |
Engineering Services Administration |
- |
35,000 |
35,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Vehicle due in November. |
||||||
11107 |
Engineering Services Design |
69,015 |
140,000 |
70,986 |
50.7% |
(69,015) |
Survey equipment ordered and part delivered, balance expected in April. 2 x cars delivered. Survey ute to be ordered in April. |
||||||
11151 |
Airport Operations |
- |
15,000 |
15,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Slasher (tractor mounted) not yet ordered. |
||||||
11202 |
Building Facilities - Weather Station Installations |
10,280 |
- |
(10,280) |
(100.0%) |
(10,280) |
The actual weather stations were procured earlier than expected, and will be installed in April. |
||||||
11401 |
Depot Workshop |
- |
10,000 |
10,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget is for a replacement hydraulic press. Specification requirements are being reviewed in light of supply chain issues. |
||||||
11402 |
Plant Purchases (P10) |
420,639 |
446,000 |
25,361 |
5.7% |
- |
Waste truck P166019 to be sent to auction end of April. Bin cleaning trailer expected to be built November. DWF site ute to be held and not replaced at this time. |
||||||
11403 |
Plant Purchases (P11) |
130,486 |
364,000 |
233,514 |
64.2% |
160,700 |
An RFQ for 3 x light trucks is in progress. Irrigation ute and Parks maintenance ute not yet ordered, waiting feedback on requirements from P&Gs team. |
||||||
11404 |
Plant Purchases (P12) |
88,453 |
515,000 |
426,547 |
82.8% |
- |
Specification development is in progress for 2 x light trucks and RFQ is in progress for a new grader. |
||||||
11500 |
Operations Services Administration |
- |
40,000 |
40,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Vehicle ordered, delivery expected in April. |
||||||
Furniture & Office Equipment |
180,767 |
549,191 |
368,424 |
67.1% |
(5,676) |
|
10250 |
Information & Communication Technology Services |
97,783 |
220,891 |
123,108 |
55.7% |
2,496 |
Underspend is due to not yet ordering ICT asset replacement items. This is due to be ordered in the coming months though actual delivery may not occur for some time due to global supply chain issues. |
||||||
10558 |
Events |
- |
200,000 |
200,000 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget YTD represents the carry-over from the 20/21 year for the electronic billboard. The tender closed with three responses over the forecast budget. The tender was not awarded and it was agreed at the November MERG meeting to restructure the tender with options. A new tender has been issued which closes on 14 April 2022. |
||||||
10590 |
Naturaliste Community Centre |
16,326 |
43,300 |
26,974 |
62.3% |
- |
The budget represents a carry-over from 20/21 for the purchase of replacement fitness equipment. Order for fitness equipment was placed in February, however delivery is not expected until April/May due to supply issues. Fencing purchase of $8k was moved out to infrastructure, increasing the variance further. |
||||||
B1350 |
Churchill Park- Other Buildings |
- |
26,450 |
26,450 |
100.0% |
- |
The budget relates to the storage facility project. Discussions are still progressing with the Stakeholders, delaying construction until a later date. |
||||||
B1450 |
Depot Building-Busselton |
17,776 |
- |
(17,776) |
(100.0%) |
- |
Expenditure was for 8 sit-to-stand workstations at the depot administration building. There is no budget in this particular line, however it is offset by considerable savings in other areas. |
Infrastructure |
11,992,351 |
22,101,394 |
10,109,042 |
45.7% |
(335,372) |
|
Various |
Roads |
4,588,763 |
6,791,553 |
2,202,790 |
32.4% |
(129,070) |
Many road construction projects are now underway. Impacting this increasing variance through to June will be the outcome from discussions with Council in September/October 2021 where it was decided that the current capital works program would be spread over 18 months extending into the 2022/23 financial year. To this end, some projects that were to be budgeted this financial year have been put on hold given the state of the economy, availability of contractors and increased costs. • 34% of the YTD variance valued at $746k is associated with the Regional Road Safety Program Chapman Hill Road project that has an approved Tender and is planned to commence mid to late March after Kaloorup works have been completed. • 25% of the YTD variance valued at $558k is associated with the Peel Terrace/ Queen street roundabout renewal works which is well under way. This project will exceed the budget due to some increases in the work scope. City officers are seeking to transfer unspent Regional Road Group grant monies across to this project. A report will go to Council if this is approved. • 27% of the YTD variance valued at $596k is associated with both the Sugarloaf Road upgrade that has been rescheduled to the 2022/23 financial year and major works on the Bussell Highway that are currently in progress. • 8% of the YTD variance valued at $185k is associated with the Causeway Road - Molloy Street Intersection will be rescheduled to another year due to planning requirements that have yet to be resolved. |
||||||
Various |
Bridges |
- |
1,444,000 |
1,444,000 |
100.0% |
- |
Major bridge works are completed by Main Roads, with financial recognition of works often not occurring until late in the financial year. To date, works have been completed on the Bussell Highway bridge #241, Yallingup Beach Road bridge #3347 and the Tuart Drive bridge #0238 that should be open to the public soon. The City has limited control over Main Roads scheduling and it is often the case that some Bridge projects are carried over into the following year. The City was recently been notified that bridge works on Layman Road, Kaloorup Road, Boallia Road & Gale Road values at $2.308m will now not commence until the 2022/23 financial year. This variance will continue to increase until invoices for works are provided by Main Roads, which is typically at the end of the financial year. |
||||||
Various |
Car Parks |
545,905 |
1,677,454 |
1,131,549 |
67.5% |
124,491 |
70% of the YTD variance valued at $792k is associated with the new car parking for the Dunsborough Lakes Sporting Precinct. Works are well under way with the first progress payments expected to be made in March. The following two projects have been put on hold contributing to the YTD variance: • Dunsborough Chieftain Crescent Carpark Extension $99k annual budget $240k. • Forth Street Groyne Carpark $53k. |
||||||
Various |
Footpaths & Cycleways |
587,371 |
1,283,626 |
696,255 |
54.2% |
126,420 |
25% of the year to date variance totalling $180k is associated with the $500k Busselton CBD Footpath Renewal project where some of this project has temporarily been put on-hold pending further review and potential re list. 15% of the YTD variance valued at $109K is associated with the Buayanup Drain Shared path project that will have some minor works completed prior to June 30. Not all the budget will be expended as the value of the project was reduced towards the end of last financial year, however the amount carried over was not adjusted based on the reduced estimate. |
Parks, Gardens & Reserves |
6,172,499 |
10,555,565 |
4,383,066 |
41.5% |
(488,998) |
|
Various |
Busselton Jetty - Capital Expenditure |
202,906 |
545,048 |
342,142 |
62.8% |
84,787 |
At the time this budget was being prepared the 50 year Jetty plan was being revised and structural assessments were being carried out. To this end, some of the scheduled works were able to be moved forward and as such were not required to be completed this financial year. There will be a variance to budget in the order of $200k come June 30; where these monies will remain in the Jetty Reserve to fund the rescheduled works going forward. |
||||||
Various |
Coastal & Boating |
187,670 |
1,136,800 |
949,130 |
83.5% |
(93,862) |
68% of the variance valued at $776k is attributable to both the stage 2 West Busselton & Forth Street seawall works. A report to Council in late January resulted in a decision to only proceed with the West Busselton works at this time with some of these costs to be offset by the Forth Street Seawall project that has been put on hold. This project will be commenced with on site after the Easter Weekend, and will be completed before the end of the FY. 18% of the variance values at $200k is associated with a Coastal Adaptation project re the Mitigation of Coastal Flooding. This project is in the design phase, and a major portion of the funding should be expended before the end of the FY, subject to the availability of resources and material. Included in this variance is sand renourishment costs over budget $88.5k YTD. These costs have since been reassigned back in against operations in March. This budget may be addressed via a budget amendment. The City secured $50k in grant funding for sand renourishment that is not yet included on the budget. |
||||||
Various |
Waste Services |
644,671 |
1,037,500 |
392,829 |
37.9% |
(178,859) |
Works associated with the Busselton Landfill Post-Closure Capping, Rehab & Remediation budget set at $1m is $408k under budget YTD with the focus on development of the phase two landfill budgeted at $500k taking priority. Costs associated with new Liquid Waste Pond are over budget $49k YTD, this is a timing variance only with the total project expected to come in under its budgeted $410k price tag. |
||||||
Various |
Townscape & Vasse River |
51,463 |
777,582 |
726,119 |
93.4% |
230,644 |
No physical works of any significance associated with projects in this category have yet to commence, however planning is well advanced. Some of the townscape works in Dunsborough valued at $1.057m will be staged, between the 21/22 and 22/23 financial years. Major Vasse River works valued at $640,000 will commence in April. |
||||||
Various |
Other P&G Infrastructure |
5,085,789 |
7,058,635 |
1,972,846 |
27.9% |
(531,708) |
There are 45 individual Parks & Gardens capital projects budgeted this financial year ranging in value from between a mere $1.8k to $2.118m. • 74% of the YTD variance valued at $ 1.468m is associated with the Dunsborough Lakes Sporting Precinct project and the new Non-Potable Water Network both under construction. • The Barnard Park East Foreshore Landscaping project is reported at $237k over expended to the annual budget. This variance is anticipated to increase to an est. $550k over expenditure to budget, this has been highlighted in Councillor briefings. |
||||||
Various |
Drainage |
16,616 |
140,800 |
124,184 |
88.2% |
31,784 |
The YTD variance to budget is largely associated with the Carey Street drainage upgrade project which has now commenced. This variance will reduce significantly by the end of March report. |
||||||
Various |
Regional Airport & Industrial Park Infrastructure |
81,197 |
208,396 |
127,198 |
61.0% |
- |
YTD actual is made up of four separate account strings all part of the Airport development project. Some are completed (underspent) and others may not be spent until the end of the FY depending on timing of the works. A nominal amount was budgeted for unforeseen noise mitigation requirements, resulting from the commencement of RPT services. Some of these works have only just commenced. |
6. Proceeds From Sale of Assets
YTD there have been minimal proceeds from sale of assets recorded against the YTD budget of $634K. This is due to the continuing delays in delivery of acquisitions, and the associated transfer to auction of the vehicles being replaced. Some vehicles that were planned to be traded/auctioned have also been retained and redeployed instead.
7. Proceeds from New Loans
By YTD February it was forecast that two self-supporting loans totalling $5.25M would have been drawn, which has not happened at this time. A further $125K of self-supporting loans to community groups was also forecasted to have been drawn and on-lent by this stage of the financial year. The combination of these things accounts for the $5.375M positive variance YTD
This is offset by a corresponding negative timing variance of $5.375M in Advances to Community Groups.
8. Total Loan Repayments - Principal
Repayments of the principal on loans is $233K under budget YTD, due to the loan for the BPACC not proceeding in the timeframe as budgeted.
9. Repayment Capital Lease
The YTD overspend compared to budget is purely a timing related variance, with a number of lease repayments forecast for March occurring in February. This will balance out by year end.
10. Advances to Community Groups
Although it is not possible to predict when these loans will be applied for, the negative variance is 100% offset by the positive variance in Proceeds from New Loans outlined above. YTD the variance is $5.375M mainly due to the AUDC being put on hold.
11. Transfer to Restricted Assets
There is a YTD variance in transfers to Restricted Assets of $19.7M because there is no budget for this item during the year, as the transfers are usually not possible to predict, and are fully reconciled only at year end.
At the time of budgeting it is not possible to predict what grants will be received in what timeframe, nor when they will be spent and hence potentially transferred to Restricted Assets (or unspent portions thereof). Loans ($10M) received for BPACC was transferred to restricted assets until utilized. Also, the following grants, totaling $6.1M, have been received and transferred to Restricted Assets for which there was no budgeted transfer:
· $50K for the Causeway Road Shared Path Project from the Department of Transport;
· $3M for various roads projects from Main Roads, State Blackspot Fund, the Regional Roads Program and the Road Safety Innovation Fund;
· $80K for the Dunsborough youth space project from the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development;
· $54K from Lotterywest for the Strengthening & Adapting Organisations program;
· $526K from DFES for the Mitigation Activity Fund and shared costs of the Emergency Services Manager;
· $60K from the Federal Government Community Grants Hub for Community Child Care Sustainability programs;
· $11K from the South West Catchment Council - National Landcare Program for the planting of 4,000 seedlings;
· $20K from Australia’s South West to fund an aviation research report for the Recovery for Regional Tourism Project Control Group;
· $100K from the Department of Primary Industries & Regional Development for the expansion of the CCTV network;
· $25K from Rio Tinto for Youth Development Services;
· $4.9K from the Busselton Senior Citizens to go towards the expansion project;
· $137K from the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources for improvements to safety and accessibility at the airport;
· $100K from the Southwest Development Corporation do develop a training and marketing campaign to build a pool of skilled hospitality workers in the region;
· $330K from the Department of Primary Industries & Regional Development’s Community Stewardship Program, for the removal of sediment in the lower Vasse river;
· $250K from Rio Tinto for the BPACC project;
· $30K from the Department of Primary Industries & Regional Development’s Small Grants Program 2021 for the upgrade of the women’s change rooms at Bovell Sports Park;
· $150K from the WA Waste Authority for the “Tip Shop” development;
· $30.8K from the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries for the “Creative Art for Heart” initiative; and
· $17.4K from the Department of Transport, from the RADS program, for the perimeter fencing at the airport.
Developer contributions, deposits and bonds are inherently hard to predict and budget for. An annual amount of $22K was budgeted for later in the year, however $3.6M has been received YTD, including $1.5M for road works bonds and $575K for caravan park deposits.
11. Transfer from Restricted Assets
YTD there has been $5.2M transferred from Restricted Assets into the Municipal Account. This was mainly attributable to $500K of Bushfire Mitigation Activity funds that did not need to be restricted, $280k attributable to cash in lieu of public open space to recoup Muni for expenditure incurred to reporting date, $1.2M utilized of the BPACC loan funds, and $3.2M of various roadworks grant & bond funding that has been utilised.
Investment Report
Pursuant to the Council’s Investment Policy, a report is to be provided to the Council on a monthly basis, detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance and counterparty percentage exposure of total portfolio. The report is also to provide details of investment income earned against budget, whilst confirming compliance of the portfolio with legislative and policy limits.
As at 28th February 2022 the value of the City’s invested funds totalled $97M, down from $100M as at 31st January 2022. The decrease is due to the transfer of $3M from the 11am account.
As at 28th February 2022 the 11AM account balance is $11.0M, down from $14M as at 31st January 2022 due to the above transfer which is to provide funds for ongoing operating expenses.
During the month of February six term deposits totalling the amount of $16.5M matured. These were renewed for a further 109 days at 0.39% on average.
The official cash rate remains steady for the month of January at 0.10%. This will continue to have an impact on the City’s interest earnings for the foreseeable future.
Borrowings Update
During the month no new loans were drawn nor any repayments made. The attached Loan Schedule outlines the status of all existing loans as at February YTD.
Chief Executive Officer – Corporate Credit Card
Details of transactions made on the Chief Executive Officer’s corporate credit card during February 2022 are provided below to ensure there is appropriate oversight and awareness.
Date |
Payee |
Description |
$ Amount |
||
02/02/22 |
The Lockup Coffee House |
BPACC SOD Turning coffees |
$71.00 |
||
02/02/22 |
The Lockup Coffee House |
BPACC SOD Turning coffees |
$21.00 |
||
15/02/22 |
The Good Egg |
CEO/Mayor lunch with Shire of Capel |
$117.00 |
||
21/02/22 |
The Australian Institute of Company Directors |
Membership Renewal - M. Archer |
*$605.00 |
||
|
|
TOTAL |
$814.00 |
||
* Funding from CEO’s professional development allowance under contract.
Donations & Contributions Received
During the month no donations or contributions were received.
Statutory Environment
Section 6.4 of the Act and Regulation 34 of the Regulations detail the form and manner in which a local government is to prepare financial activity statements.
Relevant Plans and Policies
There are no relevant plans or policies to consider in relation to this matter.
Financial Implications
Any financial implications are detailed within the context of this report.
Stakeholder Consultation
No external stakeholder consultation was required or undertaken in relation to this matter.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
The Statements of Financial Activity are presented in accordance with Section 6.4 of the Act and Regulation 34 of the Regulations and are to be received by Council. Council may wish to make additional resolutions as a result of having received these reports.
CONCLUSION
As at 28th February 2022, the City’s net current position stands at $14.5M. The City’s financial performance is considered satisfactory, and cash reserves remain strong.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Council 58 27 April 2022
12.3 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - ADOPTION OF THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE 2022/23 FINANCIAL YEAR
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.5 Responsibly manage ratepayer funds to provide for community needs now and in the future. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Fees and Charges |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Finance and Corporate Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Finance Coordinator - Jeffrey Corker |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services - Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Absolute Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment a Draft Schedule of Fees
and Charges for the 2022/23 Financial Year⇩ |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council adopts the Schedule of Fees and Charges, as per Attachment A – Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges, effective from and including 1 July 2022, subject to the following amendments:
Reasons: The Committee recognised that the proposed fees for the outdoor exercise sites were based on benchmarking with other local governments (an increase of 7%). However, in recognition of encouraging outdoor exercise, an increase of the existing fees for outdoor exercise sites only be increased by the standard fees and charges increase (2.6%). |
That the Council endorses the Schedule of Fees and Charges, as per Attachment A – Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges, effective from and including 1 July 2022.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In accordance with Regulation 5(2) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations, a local government is to undertake a review of its fees and charges regularly, and not less than once in every financial year. This report provides Council with a recommended Schedule of Fees and Charges to apply for the financial year commencing on 1 July 2022.
BACKGROUND
Each year, the City sets its fees and charges with the view of implementing any changes as of 1 July in any given year. City officers have reviewed each section of the fees and charges and have highlighted any areas of change, or reasons why no changes have occurred in comparison to the existing adopted listing.
As part of the annual review of the fees and charges, officers take into account matters including the cost to provide a service, market conditions and needs of the community. These inform the recommendations that will be made to the Council. These fees and charges recommended are in accordance with recent planning and discussions relating to the City’s Long Term Financial Plan.
When Council adopts an annual budget, it may also set its fees and charges that will be imposed during a financial year. In order for the 2022/23 schedule of fees and charges to be effective from the commencement of the new financial year, the Council is required to adopt its schedule in advance of 30 June 2022, such that any statutory public notice periods (including gazettal’s where required) can be complied with.
OFFICER COMMENT
The 2022/23 Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges has been guided by a 2.6% general escalation over currently adopted fees and charges. Notwithstanding this, in some limited instances, this principle is not appropriate, with other factors also requiring consideration. The following provides an overview, by Directorate, of noteworthy instances where an increase has not been applied, whilst also discussing, where relevant, newly proposed fees and charges.
Planning and Development Services
Building Related Fees
· General
The wording of a number of fees have been altered to provide clarity.
· Swimming Pool Inspections
Fees relating to Swimming Pools have been collated and given their own category.
The Pool Certificate Inspection fee relates to inspection as required by Regulation 28 of the Building Regulations 2012 at the completion of the construction of a swimming pool to ensure the barriers have been installed correctly and that the pool is safe to use. This fee was previously captured under the ‘Certificate of Construction / Building Compliance’ line item.
Health Related Fees
· General
A number of fees have not been increased as they are already set at the maximum statutory amount.
Town Planning Related Fees
· General
The wording of a number of fees have been altered to provide clarity and a number of fees that are Statutory in nature have been deleted as Council has no discretion over them.
Ranger & Fire Service Related Fees
· Impounding Fees – Other – Motor Vehicles
The fee for a Daily Impoundment of a Motor Vehicle has been altered for $30 to “At Cost”. The City’s towing contractor does not currently charge a daily storage fee. The fee would only be applied if that were to change, in which case the charge would be passed on to the vehicle owner.
Engineering & Works Services
Waste Disposal and Sanitation Fees
· Other Miscellaneous Charges
The fee for domestic Electronic Waste has been deleted as it subject to Contract restrictions. Commercial Electronic Waste has a separate charge.
Finance & Corporate Services
Administration / Miscellaneous Fees
· Sale of Council Documents
The fee for an Annual Subscription to the Council Minutes has been deleted as the fee is not needed as the minutes are available for free from the Internet.
Rates & Finance Charges
· Rates / Property Related Matters
The fees for ownership Listings per search and per locality have been increased to $50 to better reflect the cost of staff time involved to prepare replies.
Cemetery fees
· General
A number of fees have not been increased as price checking has indicated the Busselton fees are high compared to other similar cemeteries. Accordingly some fees have been held at previous prices to help restore parity.
The layout and wording of a number of fees has been altered with the intention of simplifying the fees and charges and removing unnecessary repetition or wording in the Cemeteries Act and Local Law.
A new fee, Request for Minor Monumental Works (cleaning, repairs, maintenance etc.); has been introduced.
A number of fees have been removed as they are no longer applicable.
Community & Commercial Services
Events – Equipment Hire & Signage
· Event Signage
Subject to Tender submissions, it is planned to replace the current events billboard with a digital billboard. This will save event organisers the supply costs for the sign skins. To provide a greater degree of parity a new hire fee for commercial events is proposed which is double that of a community hire.
ArtGeo Cultural Complex
· Courthouse Complex Hire
The charges for Courtyard and Marine Terrace Garden are to be aligned with rental of the Fodder Room and charge a flat $15 per hour. This will enable small groups to use this area with little staff involvement and activate spaces outside our normal operating hours. Target groups include well-being groups such as yoga and tai chi during the fine weather period.
· Exhibition Hire
ArtGeo Gallery fees have been removed as the gallery is now the construction site office for the Busselton Performing Arts and Convention Centre. Fees will be reviewed and proposed as part of a separate report to Council along with other fees for the venue.
It is planned to remove the exhibition charges from the Bond Store to support emerging artists. In exchange for the removal of this cost, it is intended to ask for relevant artist to reciprocate with either a free workshop, artist talk or demonstration each. This will give life and vibrancy to the complex and insure the space is constantly occupied.
Library Charges
· General
The charge for A3 photocopies (both black and white and colour) has increased to double that of an A4 photocopy, reflecting the fact that double the amount of ink is used to produce the A3 copy. This is consistent with photocopy charges set by commercial operators. The libraries’ new MFDs are set up to charge the new fees.
Busselton-Margaret River Regional Airport
· Landing Fees& General Aviation Charges
Landing Fees for the two lighter categories of aircraft have not been increased so as to encourage General Aviation use of the airport.
The fee for “Apron parking bay 1-11 per day – first 3 hours free” has been increased from $33 to $40, a 21% increase. BMRA apron parking was originally implemented lower than other regional airports to encourage aircraft overnighting. This is now occurring and apron CCTV needs to be installed and hence charges should be increased to contribute back to the cost of security CCTV.
The fee for “General aviation hardstand parking only, per day” has not been increased as a concession for GA usage of the airport.
· Car Parking
Car parking fees have not been increased with RPT flights due to commence in April.
· Other Fees
Fees relating to the Airport Reporting Officer have been increased above 2.6% to reflect increase in salaries, wages and overhead costs.
The “Hanger Hire Fee (min 200sqm) per sqm per week” has increased by 4.55% to reflect demand and also to encourage take up of the GA precinct.
Busselton Jetty Tourist Park
· General
Fees for Powered sites have generally (subject to rounding) been increased by the 2.6%. Exceptions are pensioner’s rates (~1.3% increase) and extra child/adult per night rates.
The “Cancellation booking fee” has been increased by 5% due to rounding.
The “Washing machine fee” has not increased as to do so would necessitate the coin mechanism to be changed on the washing machines.
The “Additional charge for electricity use for caravan air conditioners per day” fee has been increased by 3.57% to reflect increases in WA electricity prices.
Outdoor Exercise Sites
· General
All Outdoor Exercise Site Permits have been increased by approximately 7% as industry benchmarking suggests that the City is charging less than many other Local Governments.
Geographe Leisure Centre
· Swimming Pool
A new fee, Swimming Pool lane hire - Commercial (per lane per hour) OFF- Peak; has been introduced to encourage use of the pool after 7pm at off-peak times.
Local regular not for profit user groups – no increase to current $5 fee is recommended. Restricted lane space availability and rebuilding relationships with user groups, who have communicated issues with current fees for lane hire. An increase to this fee would create further financial issues for clubs at this time.
The “Learn to Swim” charge has only increased by 1% to keep fee rounded to $16.00 per lesson instead of $16.20. Next year will look towards increasing this to $16.50 per lesson.
The fee to hire the Small Inflatable has been increased by 17% to $140/hour to align more with outdoor inflatable and allow for increase in costs to staffing and administration costs
· Personal / Group Training
The fee for “Personal/Group Training – PT School program entry per student (min 8 students)” is to remain at $8.00, for affordability to students to attend school programs in future.
· Crèche / Activity Room
The fee for the Vacation Care Program has increased by 4% to round the fee up to $80. Noting no increase was applied in 21/22, an increase in costs for excursions has justified this 4% increase.
Naturaliste Community Centre
· Family Activity Centre
Fees to utilise this space have been increased by more than 2.6% to reflect that the room needs to be prepared by staff prior to use.
· Community Office Space
No increase to this fee has been proposed to encourage usage of the room.
· Vacation Care Program
The fee for the Vacation Care Program has increased by 4% to round the fee up to $80. Noting no increase was applied in 21/22, an increase in costs for excursions has justified this 4% increase.
Statutory Environment
Section 6.16 of the Act states that a local government may impose and recover a fee or charge for any goods or services it provides or proposes to provide, other than a service for which a service charge is imposed.
Section 6.17 of the Act further states that in determining the amount of a fee or charge for goods and services, a local government is to take in to consideration the following factors:
a) The cost to the local government of providing the service or goods;
b) The importance of the service or goods to the community; and
c) The price at which the service or goods could be provided by an alternative provider.
Section 6.18 of the Act clarifies that, if the amount of any fee or charge is determined under another written law, then a local government may not charge a fee that is inconsistent with that law.
Relevant Plans and Policies
There are no relevant plans or policies to consider in relation to this matter, other than the Long Term Financial Plan which is discussed in the subsequent Financial Implications section.
Financial Implications
Whilst revenue from fees and charges includes items that the Council has no authority to amend (statutory charges set by external bodies), it is important that, where possible, controllable fees and charges are appropriately indexed on an annual basis, to assist in offsetting the increasing costs of providing associated services. This may include increases beyond normal indexation in particular cases, in line with section 6.17 of the Act.
The Council’s current Long Term Financial Plan reflected an annual increase in Fees and Charges revenue of 2.6%. This will be reflected in the 2022/23 budget and included in future revisions and development of the Long Term Financial Plan.
Stakeholder Consultation
Business Unit Managers are responsible for reviewing fees and charges associated with activities under their control. As part of the review process, consultation may occur with other local government authorities, in addition to a review of prices offered by alternate service providers (pursuant to section 6.17 of the Act).
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
Council may recommend amendments to the Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges as it deems appropriate.
CONCLUSION
As part of the annual review of fees and charges, the currently adopted fees and charges have been reviewed in line with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and other relevant legislation as applicable. Consequently, it is recommended that Council endorses the Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges for 2022/23 as proposed.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Consequent to adoption by the Council, the Schedule of Fees and Charges for 2022/23 will become effective from and including 1 July 2022.
Council |
60 |
27 April 2022 |
||
12.3 |
Attachment a |
Draft Schedule of Fees and Charges for the 2022/23 Financial Year |
||
Council 96 27 April 2022
12.4 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - RATE EXEMPTION APPLICATION - SOUTH METROPOLITAN YOUTH LINK INC
OPPORTUNITY - A vibrant City with diverse opportunities and a prosperous economy |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
3.2 Facilitate an innovative and diversified economy that supports local enterprise, business, investment and employment growth. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Rates & Exemptions |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Finance and Corporate Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Rates Coordinator - David Nicholson |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services - Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Absolute Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment
a Rate Exemption
Application⇩ Attachment b Rate
Exemption Application Statutory Declaration⇩ Attachment c Rate
Exemption Application Covering Letter⇩ Attachment d Annual
Report - 2020⇩ |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council: 1. Grant a rate exemption to South Metropolitan Youth Link Inc. for 1A, 9 Harris Road, Busselton, effective 1st March 2022, under section 6.26(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1995; and 2. Agree that this rate exemption is to continue where South Metropolitan Youth Link Inc. confirm in writing by 30 April annually that they continue use the property for the purposes stated in the application. |
That the Council:
1. Grant a rate exemption to South Metropolitan Youth Link Inc. for 1A, 9 Harris Road, Busselton, effective 1st March 2022, under section 6.26(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1995; and
2. Agree that this rate exemption is to continue where South Metropolitan Youth Link Inc. confirm in writing by 30 April annually that they continue use the property for the purposes stated in the application.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An application seeking rate exemption on 1A, 9 Harris Road, Busselton (the Property) was received from South Metropolitan Youth Link Inc. (SMYL) on 22 February 2020 (Attachment A).
The Property is being leased by SMYL and is used to deliver a range of parenting programs and services. These are aimed at sole parents, low-income families with children, migrants and other people as to improve below functional literacy and numeracy skills for education and employment purposes.
On the basis of the application, this report recommends that rate exemption be granted under section 6.26(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) effective from 1st March 2022, being the lease commencement date.
BACKGROUND
SMYL is a large charity registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission. According to their web site they operate from locations in 14 other Councils. The organisation assists Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, adults 25 to under 65, youth 15 to under 25, families, females, males, financially disadvantaged people, migrants, refugees or asylum seekers and people at risk of homelessness or experiencing homelessness, from a culturally and linguistically diverse background, in rural/regional/remote communities, with disabilities and those that are unemployed.
A summary of the services provided are schools, vocational education, language and literacy training, mentor support, parenting skills, school to work transition for those vulnerable, those at risk or disadvantaged in the community. The core components of these programs and services are 90% funded by Government Grants including from the Commonwealth Department of Education, Skills and Employment. Additional services that are self-funded by SMYL include on-site crèche, financial counselling, budgeting, healthy eating, resilience training and may include entry level skills development, employability skills, vouchers for fuel, clothing and essential resources and "Foodbank" parcels.
Engagement with Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA)
With respect more broadly to rate exemptions for charitable organisations, following a Council resolution in May 2019, the Mayor raised this issue with the South West Zone of WALGA (SWZ) at its meeting, also in May 2019. The SWZ supported the City of Busselton’s view unanimously and resolved as follows:
That the SWZ:
1. Request that WALGA continue to lobby the State Government to consider the removal of rate exemptions for charitable organisations under the Local Government Act 1995 and that an alternative position may be implementing a rebate similar to the Pensioners and Seniors Rebate Scheme.
In response to the SWZ’s resolution, WALGA advised that the SWZ’s position is consistent with the following long-held sector position that:
1. There is a need to amend the Local Government Act to clarify that Independent Living Units should only be exempt from rates where they qualify under the Commonwealth Aged Care Act 1997; and
2. Either:
a. amend the charitable organisations section of the Local Government Act 1995 to eliminate exemptions for commercial (non-charitable) business activities of charitable organisations; or
b. establish a compensatory fund for Local Governments, similar to the pensioner discount provisions, if the State Government believes charitable organisations remain exempt from payment of Local Government rates.
WALGA also added to its submission to the State Government following the consultation on phase 2 of the review of the Act:
Request that a broad review be conducted into the justification and fairness of all rating exemption categories currently prescribed under Section 6.26 of the Local Government Act.
WALGA’s advocacy position has not changed in relation to this issue and it continues to push for meaningful legislative change in this area. Until then, however, the current approach to rate exemptions due to charitable purpose remains in place.
OFFICER COMMENT
In accordance with Section 6.26(2)(g) of the Act, land is not rateable if it is used exclusively for charitable purposes.
Rate exemption applications need to be considered in two parts. The first part is to assess whether the use itself is “charitable” and the second part is to determine whether the property is being used “exclusively” for charitable purposes.
In considering the first part, that is, ‘are the operations of SMYL considered to be a charitable use’, legal opinions have been consistent in defining a charitable purpose as land used for:
1. The relief of poverty;
2. The advancement of education;
3. The advancement of religion; and
4. Other purposes beneficial to the community.
It is considered that the vast majority of the programs and services provided by SMYL are charitable under definitions 1, 2 and 4 and as such the Property would be eligible for rate exemption under section 6.26(2)(g) of the Act.
In considering the second part, that is, ‘is the property being exclusively used for a charitable purpose’; this criteria is being met by SMYL as they are the sole occupier of unit 1A of the property from which the programs and services are being provided.
As stated previously SMYL operate locations in 14 other local government localitiess. These Councils were contacted to determine the rating status of the occupied properties with only 7 responses received at the time of compiling this report. The following is a summary of the 7 rating status responses:
· 2 Rate exemption approved (NOTE: Occupy 4 rate exempt properties within the City of Rockingham);
· 1 Rate concession approved;
· 2 Occupy part or all of Lotterywest or National Trust Buildings that are not rated;
· 2 Occupy commercial buildings that are rated as no rate exemption application lodged.
No physical inspection of the Property has been carried out as its rating classification and the statutory declaration of the Property’s use (Attachment B) is considered to be sufficient.
Statutory Environment
Section 6.26(2)(g) of the Act specifically states that land used exclusively for charitable purposes is not rateable.
Relevant Plans and Policies
There are no relevant plans or policies to consider in relation to this matter.
Financial Implications
Granting rate exemption effective 1 March 2022 would see a $3,018 reduction to Councils 2021/22 rating income.
This rating income reduction would be approximately $9,348 for future financial years where 1A 9 Harris Road, Busselton continues to be leased by SMYL and used to provide the programs and services as per their rate exemption application.
If rate exemption is denied, then there may be costs incurred by the City if SMYL was to apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review of Council’s decision.
Stakeholder Consultation
No external stakeholder consultation was required or undertaken in relation to this matter.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
That being said, if Council choses to not grant rate exemption, then staffing and/or legal costs may be incurred if the applicant refers the matter to the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) for a review of the decision.
Options
As an alternative to the proposed recommendation, Council could decline the rate exemption application on the basis that it considers the property to be rateable under the Act. As stated above, this is not recommended based on the risks associated with declining the application.
CONCLUSION
It is considered that the programs and services provided by SMYL are charitable in nature. As such the property on 1A, 9 Harris Road, Busselton is considered eligible for rate exemption under section 6.26(2)(g) of the Act.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
If rate exemption is granted on 1A, 9 Harris Road, Busselton then it would be applied effective from the 1 March 2022, being the lease commencement date immediately.
Council 129 27 April 2022
12.5 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - BUDGET AMENDMENTS: KALOORUP ROAD BRIDGE FUNDING AND ALLOCATION OF SURPLUS FUNDS TO BPACC RESERVE
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.5 Responsibly manage ratepayer funds to provide for community needs now and in the future. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
BUDGET AMENDMENT |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Finance and Corporate Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services - Tony Nottle |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services - Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Absolute Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council endorse the following requested budget amendment, transferring the budgeted 2021/22 surplus to the Busselton Performing Arts & Conference Centre (BPACC) Reserve, up to the value of $1M:
(i) The net budget amendment, as outlined within this report and in accordance with section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995, results in a reduction of the budgeted surplus position to $98,182. That the Council agree to endorse a budget amendment to recognise that bridge works are to be completed on both Kaloorup Road Bridge #3380 and Kaloorup Road Bridge #3381, Jindong.
(i) Nil impact on budget position. Reasons: In accordance with clause 10.5 of the City’s Standing Orders Local Law 2018, the Presiding Member moved the motion in two parts for clarity. |
OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
That the Council endorse:
1. The following requested budget amendment, transferring the budgeted 2021/22 surplus to the Busselton Performing Arts & Conference Centre (BPACC) Reserve, up to the value of $1M:
Reference Item # |
Description |
Net Increase in Revenue |
Net Additional Expenditure |
Net Impact on Operational Budget |
Net Impact on Cash |
Net Impact on Reserves |
1. |
Transfer to BPACC Reserve |
- |
- |
- |
(1,000,000) |
1,000,000 |
(i) The net budget amendment, as outlined within this report and in accordance with section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995, results in a reduction of the budgeted surplus position to $98,182.
2. That the Council agree to endorse a budget amendment to recognise that bridge works are to be completed on both Kaloorup Road Bridge #3380 and Kaloorup Road Bridge #3381, Jindong.
Cost Code Description |
Account String |
Amount |
||
Kaloorup Road Bridge 3381 |
541.A0023.1210.0000 |
39,000 |
debit |
adjust revenue down |
Kaloorup Road Bridge 3381 |
541.A0023.3280.0000 |
(39,000) |
credit |
adjust cost down |
Kaloorup Road Bridge 3380 |
541.NEW.1210.0000 |
(39,000) |
credit |
adjust revenue up |
Kaloorup Road Bridge 3380 |
541.NEW.3280.0000 |
39,000 |
debit |
adjust cost up |
(i) Nil impact on budget position.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report seeks Council approval of budget amendments as detailed in this report. Adoption of the officer recommendations will result in a reduction of the City’s budgeted net current position.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with section 6.8(1) of the Local Government Act 1995, a local government is not to incur expenditure from its Municipal fund for an additional purpose except where the expenditure:
· is incurred in a financial year before the adoption of the annual budget by the local government; and
· is authorised in advance by Council resolution - absolute majority required; or
· is authorised in advance by the Mayor in an emergency.
Approval is therefore sought for the budget adjustments detailed below.
OFFICER COMMENT
Council adopted its 2021/2022 Municipal budget on Monday 26 July 2021 with a budget surplus position. Since then, officers have identified budgets that require adjustment. It is good management practice to revise the adopted budget when it is known that circumstances have changed. In keeping with this practice, budgets are reviewed on a regular basis.
Amendments to the budget are categorised into the three key types as listed below:
1. Adjustments impacting the budget balance or net position of the City; relatively uncommon type.
2. Adjustments with no impact on the budget balance; most common amendment type.
3. Adjustments to transfer budget between capital and operating undertakings; relatively uncommon type.
Item 1 – BPACC Reserve Transfer
The adjustment that is required for item 1 of this budget amendment is of the type 1 category above, being an adjustment that will impact the budget balance.
The current amended budget surplus is $1,098,182. Following the mid-year budget review, it is still expected that a budget surplus will eventuate.
Per the adopted budget, any surplus will be utilised in the following budget year as part of the overall municipal funding.
In order to assist with the funding of the construction of the BPACC is it proposed to segregate up to $1M of any actual 2021/22 surplus into the BPACC Reserve, rather than effectively leaving this surplus in the municipal pool of funds.
The $1M funding was identified within the Council report at the 24 November meeting as part of the funding strategy for the BPACC. This budget amendment is to realise this funding in the reserve as per the funding strategy.
After making the above adjustments, the net municipal budget position for 2021/22 will be reduced to $98,182.
Item 2 – Second Kaloorup Road Bridge
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3381 (A0023) was included on the 2021/22 Capital works budget value at $975,000. This budget needs to be reduced to $936,000 by $39,000.
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3380, a second bridge on the same road, had works scheduled valued at $39,000. Due to an administrative misunderstanding both these budgets were added together. A new budget needs to be added to account for this project separately.
Recording these projects individually is important due to the different sources of funding, how they will be administered, the timing on when works will be completed and subsequently how they are recorded financially.
Councils approval is sought to adjust the budget accordingly. This is a simple amendment.
Bridge #3381 on Kaloorup Road is to be replaced corresponding with the road widening that has recently occurred on that section of the road. Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) is responsible for all major maintenance, renewal, upgrade and replacements of road bridges in the State including those owned by Local Governments. The detailed design and planning for this project valued at $138,000 has already been completed at a cost borne by MRWA. The cost to remove the old bridge and construct a new one is estimated at $936,000. $468,000 represents 50% of the cost to be funded via the Federal Governments Bridge Renewal Program, while the remaining 50% will be funded by MRWA.
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3381 – Scope of works $936,000
Replace with new bridge; replace bridge with a single span, 6.805m long concrete steel composite dowel-plank bridge; reinforced concrete abutments and parallel wing-walls; width between kerbs to be 9.04m; top mounted thrie-beam guardrails on bridge; w-beam guardrail extensions on all approaches and departures with extruder type end terminals; upgrade approximately 100m of road to tie existing road into new bridge.
A second bridge on Kaloorup Road #3380 has also had works scheduled to be completed in the 2021/22 Financial Year.
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3380 – Scope of works $39,000
Substructure Repairs; Superstructure Repairs; Improve headroom in Span 1; Install HyLyte delineators on guardrail.
This project is being funded more traditionally on a 2/3rd 1/3rd basis, this time with the Federal Government funding 2/3rds valued at $26,000 via a Special Bridge Grant paid via the Financial Assistance Grant (FAG) arrangements. MRWA is contributing the other 1/3rd valued at $13,000. The City has already received the $26,000 as part of its Financial Assistance Grant payment. The City will on-pay MRWA the $26,000 on completion of the project.
The City has recently been notified that these works will be completed this financial year.
Statutory Environment
Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 refers to expenditure from the Municipal fund that is not included in the annual budget. In the context of this report, where no budget allocation exists, expenditure is not to be incurred until such time as it is authorised in advance, by an absolute majority decision of the Council.
Relevant Plans and Policies
There are multiple plans and policies that support the proposed budget amendments, in particular, the adopted 2021/22 budget and the recently endorsed Long Term Financial Plan.
Financial Implications
The details of the financial implications of these recommendations is shown below.
Ref Item # |
Description |
Net (Increase) / Decrease in Revenue |
Net Increase / (Decrease) in Expenditure |
Net Impact on Operational Budget |
Net Impact on Capital Budget |
Net Impact on Cash |
Net Impact on Reserves |
1. |
Transfer to BPACC Reserve |
- |
- |
- |
|
(1,000,000) |
1,000,000 |
2. |
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3381 |
39,000 |
(39,000) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kaloorup Road Bridge #3380 |
(39,000) |
39,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Stakeholder Consultation
No external stakeholder consultation was required or undertaken in relation to item 1, Main Roads was and continues to be consulted in relation to item 2.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
The Council could decide not to proceed with the proposed budget amendment request.
CONCLUSION
Council’s approval is sought to amend the budget as per the details contained in this report.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
If the officer recommendation is endorsed, the budget amendment will be processed within a month of being approved.
Council 133 27 April 2022
12.6 Finance Committee - 13/4/2022 - BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR PERCENT FOR ART
LIFESTYLE - A place that is relaxed, safe and friendly with services and facilities that support healthy lifestyles and wellbeing |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
2.5 Facilitate events and cultural experiences that provide social connection. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Budget Amendment |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Community Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Cultural Development Officer - Jacquie Happ |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director, Community and Commercial Services - Naomi Searle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Absolute Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment
a Location of Site
and Easement⇩ Attachment b Artist
Brief⇩ |
This item was considered by the Finance Committee at its meeting on 13/4/2022, the recommendations from which have been included in this report.
That the Council endorses a budget amendment to transfer $13,750 of developer contributions from the Cash in Lieu Public Art Reserve and accepts $11,818 in contributions for the design and installation of mural in the Vasse Precinct. |
That the Council endorses a budget amendment to transfer $13,750 of developer contributions from the Cash in Lieu Public Art Reserve and accepts $11,818 in contributions for the design and installation of mural in the Vasse Precinct.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City’s Cash in Lieu - Public Art Reserve - 341 collects cash in lieu funds from developer contributions through the Local Planning Policy No. 4.4 Percent for Art. Funds received are allocated to the precincts that they originate from. The funds are put towards artworks that will create vibrancy and interest in the precinct.
Funds are transferred from the City’s Public Art Reserve to the Cultural Planning budget. The funds transferred mentioned in this report will be used to pay for a public art consultant to assist in the selection of an artist to paint a mural and the cost of the mural in the Vasse Precinct.
BACKGROUND
The Vasse Precinct Developer commissioned a Public Art Strategy as a guide to creating a vibrant and engaging town centre. The City has been working with the Developer to commission artworks that are appropriate to the town centre, have a local and social theme, and are diverse in art form. The first artworks were commissioned and a public art consultant was engaged to manage the expression of interest process.
The Vasse Precinct has an allocation of funds in the City’s Cash in Lieu Public Art Reserve through contributions from McDonald’s and Coles (store and service station). According to the policy, these funds must be spent in the Vasse Precinct.
In 2018 three artworks were commissioned and installed through expenditure from the Public Art Reserve. City Officers work with the Developer, property owners and a public art consultant to procure the artworks for the Precinct. These artworks were installed in spaces that are thoroughfares or where there is high traffic movement of people and vehicles, or high visual outcomes. They were not installed on the properties that the funds were received from.
The artwork that is the subject of this report is to be located at Lot 114, 4 Warrior Court, Vasse. The building abuts the vacant land on Lot 113 Warrior Court Figure 1 (Attachment A - Location of Site and Easement). Lot 113 has an easement of 6m for drainage and Public Access Figure 2 (Attachment A Location of Site and Easement). The easement will provide a buffer between the current and future buildings. It prevents a building being constructed hard up against the current property wall. While there is no guarantee that there will be a wider laneway, it is highly likely.
The draft Vasse Village Precinct Structure Plan by Hatch I Robert Day encourages street frontages with rear access for parking and services so there is a nil setback along Coomidup Boulevard. This means the easement will likely be wider or have a staggered building at various widths. The Lot 114 is currently sharing an access way Figure 1 (Attachment A).
Officers began working with the Developer and public art consultant on an artist brief in June 2021, through which appropriate themes were identified, as outlined in Attachment B - Artist Brief. The Developer and property owners have signed an Agreement for a Licence to allow the City to install and maintain artwork on the Lot.
The next stage requires the engagement of a public art consultant to conduct an Expression of Interest (EOI) process using the Artist Brief (Attachment B Artist Brief) and select an artist. The artist will then be commissioned by the City to paint the mural.
OFFICER COMMENT
There is currently $195,991 in Percent for Art 341 Public Art Reserve of which $32,296 is allocated to the Vasse Precinct. The Reserve funds are for artworks to be created in the precinct from where the funds are received. In 2018, there were three artworks commissioned for the Vasse Precinct using the Public Art Reserve funds. These are an overhead laneway canopy featuring artwork by Ian Mutch, a sculpture by Peter Zappa and a mural by Mel McVee.
The reserve funds are transferred to the Cultural Planning capital budget. The Developer and Owners of the property will be invoiced for additional funding. The funds will be used to contract a public art consultant and cost of the new mural. The project seeks to enhance a location that will become a laneway and linking space in the future.
Activating laneways is a positive way to design out crime as they keep spaces looking busy as people and vehicles move through them. This laneway is likely to be a short cut for pedestrians walking from parking between Warrior Court and Ganges Lane through to the commercial area. The mural will provide high visual impact immediately and strong laneway visibility in the future. Examples of this sort of activation includes the recent Reject Shop artwork in Busselton (6.3m width) and Dunsborough’s Hannay Lane (7.9m). These laneways attract people as they walk past and contribute to the vibrancy of the space.
A Licence has been signed by the three parties to provide permission from the Owner to the City to install the mural and maintain it. The artwork will be commissioned through an EOI undertaken by the art consultant so it will comply with the City’s Purchasing Policy.
The project financials are shown in the table below.
ITEM # |
ACCOUNT CODE STRING |
DESCRIPTION |
AMOUNT DR / (CR) |
CURRENT BUDGET |
AMENDED BUDGET |
1 |
341 Public Art Reserve |
Cash in Lieu contribution from Public Art Reserve (Vasse Precinct) |
($13,750) |
$0 |
($13,750) |
2 |
330-10900-1300-0000 |
Contributions - Operating Activities |
($11,818) |
$0 |
($11,818) |
3 |
330-10900-7743-0000 |
Exp Offset Acc-Furn & Equip |
$25,568 |
$25,400* |
$50,968 |
|
|
Net total |
$0 |
$25,400 |
$25,400 |
|
*comprises funds for Sculpture by the Bay ($12,000) to be rolled over, Aboriginal artwork ($7,000) and furniture for the Ballaarat Room ($2,477), (Interpretation for Ballaarat Anniversary ($4,721) (Balance $292) |
Statutory Environment
Section 6.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 refers to expenditure from the Municipal fund that is not included in the annual budget. Any adjustments to a budget allocation must be made by an absolute majority decision of the Council. Additionally, where no budget allocation exists, expenditure is not to be incurred until such time as it is authorised in advance, by an absolute majority decision of the Council.
Relevant Plans and Policies
The Local Planning Policy 4.4 Percent for Art aligns o the officer recommendation, as it allows the City to commission artworks in precincts where cash in lieu contributions have been made by developers.
Financial Implications
The City’s net municipal cash budget position remains unchanged as a result of this budget amendment.
Stakeholder Consultation
City Officers have worked with the Developer, property owner and the public art consultant on this project. External stakeholder consultation has been conducted by the Developer.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
As an alternative to the proposed recommendation the Council could refuse the recommendation to transfer funds. If the funds are refused, the Developer and property owner will be unable to proceed with the artwork. Both parties are likely to dispute the City’s Local Planning Policy 4.4 for Percent for Art given the request complies with the policy.
CONCLUSION
Funds from the Local Planning Policy 4.4 Percent for Art allow for the commissioning of artwork in the precinct that the funds are received from. The funds will be used to contract a public art consultant to send out an EOI and contract an artist to produce a mural in the Vasse Precinct, under agreements executed between the City, the Developer and Public Art Consultant. The artwork will contribute to the aesthetic and vibrancy of the Vasse precinct.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
Upon adoption by Council, the artwork EOI process will commence immediately.
Council 144 27 April 2022
16. Finance and Corporate Services Report
16.1 ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE AND ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING DATES
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.2 Deliver governance systems that facilitate open, ethical and transparent decision making. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Council Meetings |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Governance Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Governance Coordinator - Emma Heys |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Director Finance and Corporate Services - Tony Nottle |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Executive: Substantial direction setting, including adopting budgets, strategies, plans and policies (excluding local planning policies); funding, donations and sponsorships; reviewing committee recommendations |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Simple Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment
a Amended Council
policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (clean)⇩ Attachment b Amended Council policy: Meetings,
Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (tracked)⇩ |
That the Council: 1. agrees to trial an alternative meeting schedule for the Ordinary Meetings of Council, Agenda Briefing and Community Access Sessions from July to December 2022; and 2. adopts the following amended dates for the Ordinary Meetings of Council from July to December 2022: · 20th July · 17th August · 21st September · 19th October · 16th November · 21st December; and 3. adopts the amended Council policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (the Policy) as per Attachment A. |
This report presents an alternative meeting schedule for the Ordinary Meetings of Council for Council to trial for the period July through to December 2022, along with changes to the scheduling of Agenda Briefings and Community Access Sessions (CAS) and an amended Council policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (the Policy), as at Attachment A.
BACKGROUND
The City of Busselton has traditionally held two Ordinary Meetings of Council per month, on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month, with Community Access Sessions being held the first and third Wednesdays of each month. Additionally the City holds Agenda Briefing Sessions prior to each CAS and Council Meeting, providing Councillors with the opportunity to ask questions of officers on the current agenda items before them.
Pursuant to section 5.3 of the Local Government Act 1995 (Act), a Council must hold Ordinary Meetings of Council no more than three months apart. Council is otherwise permitted to schedule the dates and times of its Ordinary Meetings as it sees fit. Council adopted the 2022 dates for the Ordinary Meetings of Council in November 2021 (C2111/098).
OFFICER COMMENT
In an effort to streamline the City’s decision making practices and reduce both the administrative functions associated with meeting processes and the in person demands on Councillors, officers are proposing that the Council trial moving from two to one Ordinary Meetings of Council per month.
Officers are also proposing that changes be made to the way in which CAS and Agenda Briefings function in order to separate matters associated with decision making from CAS, proposed as a general community engagement session for matters not currently before Council. To further support this position, officers have amended the Policy to reflect the intended purpose of CAS.
City of Busselton Councillors currently attend the City for briefings, Committee and working group meetings every Wednesday (often from 9am and always from 1pm), with CAS and Ordinary Council meetings held on alternate Wednesdays from 5.30pm. Some Councillors have expressed difficulty in balancing these commitments with their own business / employment commitments. Additionally Councillors have expressed a desire for information provision to be more focused and strategic.
Council were briefed on the proposed alternative meeting schedule in April, with the majority of Councillors supportive of trialling the change from July through to December 2022.
It is proposed to hold one Community Access Session per month on the first Wednesday of each month and one Ordinary Meeting of Council on the third Wednesday of each month. Agenda Briefings will be held the second and third Wednesday of each month for Councillors to ask questions of officers on current agenda items. Additionally, the week prior to the Council Meeting (week 2) a public presentations session will be held from 5.30pm for community members with a relevant interest on current agenda items to present to Councillors. Agendas will be released the Thursday preceding the Community Access Session (that is, the Thursday of week 1).
The fourth Wednesday of each month will generally be an attendance free week, although scope exists for strategic workshops to be scheduled for this week as required. Any fifth Wednesday will also remain attendance free.
It is proposed that Finance Committee meetings continue to be held once a month, on the first Wednesday of each month, with Policy and Legislation Committee meetings held bi-monthly, also on the first Wednesday of each month. Council’s other committees will be held on alternative months to the Policy and Legislation Committee meeting, with working group meetings and Committees (where required) to meet on the morning of the second and third Wednesday of each month. The proposed changes to the committee meeting dates will be the subject of separate reports to the respective Committees in the coming weeks.
The trial for the proposed changes will run from 5 July until 22 December 2022. The Councillors mid-year recess will be adjusted to allow the new schedule to commence, with Councillors returning from recess 5 July instead of 17 July; noting that two Councillors have already booked holidays and will submit leave of absences. The end of year recess will also be adjusted, commencing 22 December, as opposed to 15 December.
The proposed dates for the Ordinary Meetings of Council are:
· 20th July
· 17th August
· 21st September
· 19th October
· 16th November
· 21st December
Statutory Environment
Pursuant to section 5.3 of the Local Government Act (Act), a Council must hold Ordinary Meetings and may hold Special Meetings of Council. Ordinary Meetings of Council must be held no more than three months apart (as per section 5.3(2) of the Act).
Regulation 12 of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996 (the Regulations) requires a local government to, at least once per year, give local public notice of the dates on which, and the time and place at which, Ordinary Meetings of Council are to be held for the following 12 months.
Relevant Plans and Policies
Council policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Process applies and for the reasons outlined in the officer comment, the Policy has been amended and is presented for Council’s endorsement (Attachment A).
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications associated with the officer recommendation.
Stakeholder Consultation
No external stakeholder consultation was required or undertaken in relation to this matter.
Risk Assessment
An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the officer recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk management framework, with risks assessed taking into account any controls already in place. No risks of a medium or greater level have been identified.
Options
As an alternative to the proposed recommendation the Council could chose to
1. trial a different amended meeting schedule;
2. defer changes until 2023 and continue to hold two Ordinary Meetings of Council and Community Access Sessions per month during 2022;
3. decide not to trial any changes.
CONCLUSION
Officers are proposing that Council trial an alternative meeting schedule for the remainder of the Ordinary Meetings of Council for 2022, holding one Ordinary Meeting of Council and one Community Access Session per month, from July to December 2022, along with a community agenda briefing session.
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
If endorsed by Council, the alternative meeting schedule will be advertised as per section 12 of the Regulations and commence from 5 July 2022.
Council |
148 |
27 April 2022 |
||
16.1 |
Attachment a |
Amended Council policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (clean) |
||
151 |
27 April 2022 |
|||
16.1 |
Attachment b |
Amended Council policy: Meetings, Information Sessions and Decision Making Processes (tracked) |
||
Council 154 27 April 2022
17. Chief Executive Officers Report
17.1 COUNCILLORS INFORMATION BULLETIN
LEADERSHIP - A Council that connects with the community and is accountable in its decision making. |
|
STRATEGIC PRIORITY |
4.2 Deliver governance systems that facilitate open, ethical and transparent decision making. |
SUBJECT INDEX |
Councillors' Information Bulletin |
BUSINESS UNIT |
Executive Services |
REPORTING OFFICER |
Reporting Officers - Various |
AUTHORISING OFFICER |
Chief Executive Officer - Mike Archer |
NATURE OF DECISION |
Noting: The item is simply for information purposes and noting |
VOTING REQUIREMENT |
Simple Majority |
ATTACHMENTS |
Attachment
a Letter from WALGA
and Reconciliation WA⇩ |
That the items from the Councillors’ Information Bulletin be noted: 17.1.1 Minor Donations Program – March 2022 17.1.2 Current Active Tenders 17.1.3 Letter from WALGA and Reconciliation WA – National Reconciliation Week Activation Program for Local Government |
This report provides an overview of a range of information that is considered appropriate to be formally presented to the Council for its receipt and noting. The information is provided in order to ensure that each Councillor, and the Council, is being kept fully informed, while also acknowledging that these are matters that will also be of interest to the community.
Any matter that is raised in this report as a result of incoming correspondence is to be dealt with as normal business correspondence, but is presented in this bulletin for the information of the Council and the community.
INFORMATION BULLETIN
17.1.1 Minor Donations Program – March 2022
The Council allocates an annual budget allowance to the Minor Donations Program. This is provided such that eligible groups and individuals can apply for and receive sponsorship to assist them in the pursuit of endeavors that bring direct benefit to the broader community.
Allocation of funds is delegated to the Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with the published guidelines and funding availability.
Five applications were approved in March 2022, totaling $1,500, as outlined below:
Recipient |
Purpose |
Amount |
Busselton Amateur Basketball Association |
Busselton Amateur Basketball Association arranged for the Senior Basketball Finals at the GLC in March to be livestreamed. This allowed the many people who could not attend because of covid restrictions to view the finals, promoted the sport of basketball which is rapidly growing in popularity, and showcased basketball in the City of Busselton to the wider population. |
$500 |
Gail Kearney Memorial Busselton Hospice Charity Golf Day |
The Gail Kearney Memorial Busselton Hospice Charity Golf Day was held on 25 March, this is the 19th year that this event has taken place, raising more than $580,000 for the Busselton Hospice. |
$250 |
Busselton Old Time Dance Inc. |
The Busselton Old Time Dance group are hosting the annual SW Dance Festival at the High St Hall on 1 April, which attracts participants from outside the region. |
$250 |
Madison Fenwick |
Maddison has been selected by Hockey WA for the 2022 U18 State Team that will compete at the Australian Championships in Cairns, Queensland in April. |
$500 |
Mia Anderson |
Mia has been selected by Basketball WA for the 2022 Country Women’s State Team that will compete at the U18 Australian Junior Championships in Ballarat, Victoria in April. |
$500 |
Total |
$2,000 |
17.1.2 Current Active Tenders
EOI 01/21 SOUTH WEST REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
· Requirements – a waste management expert to provide solutions to participating local governments in the South West of WA for sustainable, long term management of municipal solid waste.
· An expression of interest on behalf of a number of South West regional local governments was advertised on 30 September 2021 and closed on 25 November 2021.
· 12 submissions were received.
· An evaluation panel has reviewed the submissions and is finalising a report to the CEOs of the South West Regional local governments.
RFT 24/21 BUSSELTON MARGARET RIVER AIRPORT – GENERAL AVIATION HANGARS
· Requirements – a suitable Contractor to design and construct four general aviation hangar sheds at the Busselton Margaret River Airport.
· A request for tender was advertised on 22 December 2021 and closed on 25 January 2022.
· 3 submissions were received.
· An evaluation panel is reviewing the submissions.
· The value of the contract falls within the CEO’s delegated power for accepting tenders.
RFT 01/22 CONCRETE CRUSHING SERVICES
· Requirements – a suitable Contractor to crush the brick and concrete waste pile at Dunsborough Waste Facility to produce drainage aggregate.
· A request for tender was advertised on 12 March 2022, closing on 20 April 2022.
· The number of submissions received will be included in the next tender update report.
· The value of the contract is likely to fall within the CEO’s delegated power for accepting tenders.
RFT02/22 EXTERNAL CLEANING CONTRACT
· Requirements – regular cleaning services to the City’s ablution blocks and BBQs.
· A request for tender was advertised on 23 March 2022, closing on 21 April 2022.
· The number of submissions received will be included in the next tender update report.
· The value of the contract is likely to exceed the CEO’s delegated power for accepting tenders.
RFT03/22 WATER MAIN RELOCATION – DUNSBOROUGH
· Requirements – a suitable Contractor to relocate a water main (a Water Corporation asset) between Dunn Bay Road and Cyrillean Way, Dunsborough.
· A request for tender was advertised on 26 March 2022, closing on 21 April 2022.
· The number of submissions received will be included in the next tender update report.
· The value of the contract is likely to fall within the CEO’s delegated power for accepting tenders.
RFT 04/22 DIGITAL BILLBOARD
· Requirements – a suitable supplier to design and construct a digital billboard on Bussell Hwy.
· A request for tender was advertised on 23 March 2022, closing on 27 April 2022.
· The number of submissions received will be included in the next tender update report.
· The value of the contract will fall within the CEO’s delegated power for accepting tenders.
17.1.3 Letter from WALGA and Reconciliation WA – National Reconciliation Week Activation Program for Local Government
This letter informs the City of the activities happening and opportunities for the City to be involved in this year’s National Reconciliation Week 27 May – 3 June 2022.
See Attachment A.