COB-RGB

 

 

 

 

 

Council Agenda

 

 

 

13 September 2017

 

 

 

 

 


ALL INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN VARIOUS FORMATS ON REQUEST

city@busselton.wa.gov.au

 

 


CITY OF BUSSELTON

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA – 13 September 2017

 

 

 

TO:                  THE MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS

 

 

NOTICE is given that a meeting of the Council will be held in the Council Chambers, Administration Building, Southern Drive, Busselton on Wednesday, 13 September 2017, commencing at 5.30pm.

 

Your attendance is respectfully requested.

 

 

 

Mike Archer

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

1 September 2017


CITY OF BUSSELTON

Agenda FOR THE Council MEETING TO BE HELD ON 13 September 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ITEM NO.                                        SUBJECT                                                                                                                              PAGE NO.

1....... Declaration of Opening and Announcement of Visitors. 5

2....... Attendance. 5

Apologies. 5

Approved Leave of Absence. 5

3....... Prayer. 5

4....... Public Question Time. 5

Response to Previous Questions Taken on Notice. 5

Public Question Time. 5

5....... Announcements Without Discussion.. 5

Announcements by the Presiding Member. 5

Announcements by other Members at the invitation of the Presiding Member. 5

6....... Application for Leave of Absence. 5

7....... Petitions and Presentations. 5

8....... Disclosure Of Interests. 5

9....... Confirmation and Receipt Of Minutes. 5

Previous Council Meetings. 5

9.1          Minutes of the Council Meeting held 22 August 2017. 5

Committee Meetings. 5

9.2          Policy and Legislation Committee Meeting Minutes 17 August 2017. 5

10..... Reports of Committee. 6

10.1        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - LOCAL PLANNING POLICY - HOLIDAY HOMES  6

10.2        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - COUNCIL POLICY 243 - REHOMING OF IMPOUNDED DOGS AND CATS. 23

10.3        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - CONSOLIDATED PARKING SCHEME AMENDMENT - PRIES AVENUE, BUSSELTON.. 28

10.4        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF POLICY 236 RATING.. 35

10.5        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - POLICY - AASB124 RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES. 42

10.6        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF POLICY 001 - FEES, ALLOWANCES AND EXPENSES FOR ELECTED MEMBERS. 53

10.7        Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF WORKING GROUPS. 69

11..... Planning and Development Services Report. 76

11.1        PROPOSED SCHEME AMENDMENT 27 TO LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME 21 AND DRAFT STRUCTURE PLAN FOR LOT 10 COMMONAGE ROAD, DUNSBOROUGH.. 76

11.2        APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR AN EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY (LIMESTONE) AND CRUSHING FACILITY AT LOT 3 (130) & LOT 237 LUNDLOW PARK ROAD WONNERUP. 93

12..... Engineering and Works Services Report. 212

12.1        PROCLAMATION OF MAIN ROADS - BUSSELL HIGHWAY, NORTHERLY STREET AND WALGER CLOSE. 212

13..... Community and Commercial Services Report. 218

13.1        DRAFT LIBRARY SERVICES STRATEGY 2017-2027. 218

14..... Finance and Corporate Services Report. 264

15..... Chief Executive Officer's Report. 265

15.1        COUNCILLORS' INFORMATION BULLETIN.. 265

15.2        CapeROC- REVIEW OF THE TERMS OF REFERENCE. 300

16..... Motions of which Previous Notice has been Given.. 308

16.1        Amendment to the 2017/18 budget to co-fund extensions to the John Edward Pavillion. 308

17..... Confidential Reports. 315

18..... Questions from Members. 315

19..... Public Question Time. 315

20..... Next Meeting Date. 315

21..... Closure. 315

 


Council                                                                                      5                                                           13 September 2017

 

1.               Declaration of Opening and Announcement of Visitors

2.               Attendance 

Apologies

Approved Leave of Absence

3.               Prayer

The Prayer will be delivered by Pastor Emily Seinemeier of Cornerstone Church.

4.               Public Question Time

Response to Previous Questions Taken on Notice 

Public Question Time

5.               Announcements Without Discussion

Announcements by the Presiding Member 

Announcements by other Members at the invitation of the Presiding Member

6.               Application for Leave of Absence

7.               Petitions and Presentations 

8.               Disclosure Of Interests

9.               Confirmation and Receipt Of Minutes 

Previous Council Meetings

9.1             Minutes of the Council Meeting held 22 August 2017

Recommendation

That the Minutes of the Council Meeting held 22 August 2017 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

Committee Meetings

9.2             Policy and Legislation Committee Meeting Minutes 17 August 2017

RECOMMENDATION

That the minutes of the Policy and Legislation Committee Meeting held 17 August 2017 be received.

 

 


Council                                                                                      10                                                         13 September 2017

10.             Reports of Committee

10.1           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - LOCAL PLANNING POLICY - HOLIDAY HOMES

SUBJECT INDEX:

Development Control Policy

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Attractive parks and open spaces that create opportunities for people to come together, socialise and enjoy a range of activities.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Development Services and Policy

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Development Services

REPORTING OFFICER:

Senior Development Planner - Andrew Watts

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Planning and Development Services - Paul Needham

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Local Planning Policy 7C Holiday Homes Provisions

Attachment b    7C Holiday Homes Provisions

Attachment c    Planning Bulletin 99  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

PRÉCIS

 

As a part of the review of the City’ planning framework, it has been identified that a review of the current City of Busselton Local Planning Policy 7C Holiday Homes Provisions (LPP 7C) [Attachment A] is appropriate.

 

The revised Policy is presented to Council for review and Council’s approval is sought to proceed to advertising of an amended City of Busselton Local Planning Policy - Holiday Homes Provisions (Attachment B), following which the revised policy would be further considered by the Council, in light of any submissions received.

 

BACKGROUND

 

In December 2012 the Council adopted LPP 7C; this was one of the final steps in the introduction of a regulatory regime for holiday homes in the City. Prior to that time, holiday homes had been essentially de facto unregulated. The regulatory regime was brought into effect in a practical sense during 2013.

 

The current policy includes restrictions on the locations of holiday homes within residential areas, where holiday homes are generally not supported in those residential areas more distant from the coast and other significant tourist facilities (e.g. Yalyalup, Vasse). Despite that, a number of applications have been received for properties in those areas. Some of those applications have been referred to Council for determination with approval in some cases being granted. It should also be noted that, during the introductory phase, during 2013, approvals were generally granted for ‘established’ holiday homes in those areas.

 

Holiday homes are an economically important component of the local tourist accommodation mix and play a significant role as part of a pathway to permanent residency in the City. Because of that, a significant proportion of the construction related employment in the City is related to holiday homes. That was, in fact, an important finding, including specifically in relation to the City of Busselton, of an extensive study into temporary population flows in coastal areas undertaken for the Australian Coastal Councils’ Association.

 


 

It is also considered that, relative to the scale of the holiday home industry in the City (with upwards of 600 homes being registered), the number of complaints received by the City in respect to the operation of approved holiday homes is very low (in the order of 70 in total over five years, of which the bulk are repeat complaints related to a small number of properties only).

 

The amended policy proposes a removal of location restrictions for holiday homes. The policy is also in a revised format identifying ‘deemed-to-comply’ and ‘performance criteria’ provisions. These matters are outlined and discussed further in the ‘Officer Comment’ section of this report.

 

In addition to the above, it is recommended that the Council foreshadow amending the town planning scheme to reduce the need to consult on some classes of applications in future. This is also discussed in more detail in the ‘Officer Comment’ section of this report.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

The key statutory environment relevant to this matter is set out in the Planning and Development Act 2005, the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, the City’s Local Planning Scheme and the City’s Holiday Homes Local Law.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

LPP 7C sets out guidance to determine an application for a holiday home; a copy of the current policy is provided as Attachment A.

 

Western Australian Planning Commission Planning Bulletin 99 (PB99) sets out the aims for local governments when drafting Local Planning Policy on Holiday Homes. The proposed Policy is generally consistent with the aims of PB99. A copy of PB99 is at Attachment C.

 

This report recommends the adoption of a revised local planning policy to supplement cl 5.17 of the City’s Planning Scheme.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The revised policy, if adopted by the Council after consultation, would marginally reduce the cost to the City of assessing applications for development approval for holiday homes.

 

Long-Term Financial Plan Implications

 

There are no significant Long Term Financial Plan Implications.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The recommendation of this report reflects Community Objectives 2.2 and 3.1 of the Strategic Community Plan 2013, which are –

 

2.2          A City of shared, vibrant and well planned places that provide for diverse activity and strengthen our social connections.

3.1          A strong, innovative and diversified economy that attracts people to live, work, invest and visit.

 


 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the Officer Recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk assessment framework. The assessment identifies ‘downside’ risks only, rather than ‘upside’ risks as well. Risks are only identified where the individual risk, once controls are identified, is medium or greater. No such risks were identified.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Consultation regarding the proposed amendment of the local planning policy, if that is supported by the Council, will require notice and invitation for submissions to be received within 21 days, following which the amendments would be further considered by the Council, in light of any submissions received

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The most substantive change proposed with the draft policy is the removal of restrictions on the location of holiday homes in some residential areas. At present, the policy does not support holiday homes being established in some residential areas, mostly areas that are further from the coast and tourist amenities, including areas such as Vasse, Yalyalup (i.e. Provence, Via Vasse, Willow Grove, Country Road estates) and parts of Dunsborough (i.e. areas to the west of Naturaliste Terrace, including the Cape Rise and Naturaliste Heights estates). Notably, as a result of revisions made to the policy in 2015, the policy does currently support holiday homes in the area of the Dunsborough Lakes estate.

 

Since those 2015 revisions were made, which were driven in part by consideration of a number of applications for holiday homes in the area of the Dunsborough Lakes estate, there have been a number of applications and enquiries related to establishment of holiday homes in the north-western portion of the Dunsborough urban area; in older areas between Naturaliste Terrace and Cape Naturaliste Road, as well as in the area to the west of Cape Naturaliste Road, such as in the Cape Rise and Naturaliste Heights estates. There have also been applications and enquiries relating to some areas of the Busselton-Vasse urban where holiday homes are not currently supported, including the area of the Willow Grove estate.

 

Having considered the issues, officers are of the view that the restrictions do not have a clear purpose or rationale, and are not necessary. It is considered likely that holiday homes will still tend to be located predominantly in what most would consider to be higher tourism amenity locations – principally, locations closer to the coast. It is also considered, though, that the areas where the most pressure to approve holiday homes in the restricted areas is apparent are also actually areas that do have a suitable amenity – including those north-western areas in Dunsborough, and lower density residential areas in Busselton, such as Willow Grove or Country Road. These also tend to be the areas where the majority of ‘established’ holiday homes were approved during the introductory phase.

 

Almost exclusively the issues that are raised by members of the public in respect to proposed or existing holiday homes relate to impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties as a result of concerns regarding potential or perceived:

·    Anti-social behavior;

·    Noise;

·    Lack of privacy;

·    Traffic and parking;

·    Inadequacy of property to accommodate the proposed number of occupants;

·    Waste management; and

·    Holiday home managers not fulfilling their responsibilities.

Whilst these issues are regularly raised during consultation, it is apparent that for the overwhelming majority of holiday homes, they do not appear to be significant problems once holiday homes are actually operating. Whilst the information base is limited and largely anecdotal, it is certainly the view of City officers that have been involved both before and now after the introduction of the current regulatory regime, that complaints and concerns are fewer and less intense than what they were prior to the introduction of the current regime. It is also worth noting that problems of this kind can also arise with permanently occupied housing, or with holiday homes not being used for commercial purposes – although the experience is in some ways qualitatively different.

 

To provide for more clarity for applicants, neighbours and assessing officers in regard to the determination of the suitability of an individual property as a holiday home, the proposed policy has also been amended to provide clearer and in some instances tighter guidelines on utility servicing, dwelling design, car parking and fire management requirements.

 

The format of the policy has been restructured such that each of the elements against which a proposed holiday home is to be assessed has been set out under a separate heading, with ‘deemed–to-comply’ provisions being identified, the satisfying of which would make the proposal considered acceptable, and performance criteria also being identified – the latter intended to be applied when a proposal does not meet the relevant deemed-to-comply provisions. This format is designed to provide greater ease of use and certainty for applicants, and clear development standards by which an application will be assessed.

 

Applications that meet all of the ‘deemed-to-comply’ provisions would be approved without further assessment. Applications that do not meet all of the ‘deemed-to-comply’ provisions would be assessed against the relevant ‘performance criteria’ (i.e. they would only be assessed against the latter in relation to those aspects to which they do not meet the former). So if the ‘car parking’ deemed-to-comply provisions are met, but the ‘dwelling design’ ones are not, dwelling design related issues would require assessment against the dwelling design performance criteria, but the car parking related issues would not require assessment against the car parking related performance criteria.

 

In addition to the above, it is also recommended that the Council foreshadow future changes to the town planning scheme that would narrow the circumstances in which holiday home applications would be subject of consultation. At present, all applications must be subject of consultation is they are for the use of grouped dwellings (units, villas or the like) or multiple dwellings (flats, apartments or the like), or for single houses where nine or more people (noting that the maximum number permissible in single houses is 12) are proposed to be accommodated.

 

A significant proportion of holiday homes in single houses are for 9 or more people, usually 12, and as such in those cases advertising is always required. In many instances, however, there would be no basis to refuse an application, and there is no conceivable issue that could be raised during consultation that might reasonably justify a refusal. Notwithstanding that, where consultation is compulsory, neighbours may be inclined to object. As a general principle, it is felt that consultation should be avoided if there is not a reasonable prospect of the consultation response having a significant effect on the ultimate decision. That is because: consultation creates an expectation that the consultees’ views will have a significant bearing on the outcome, and where that does not occur it often causes more concern than if consultation had not occurred in the first place; consultation in such circumstances can undermine the relationship between the applicant and their neighbours; and consultation in such circumstances unnecessarily delays and adds to the costs of decision-making, both from the perspective of the applicant and the City.

 


 

Given the above, it is recommended that the Council foreshadow amending the scheme such that the scheme itself does not mandate consultation. As is the case now, though, it would still be proposed that holiday homes be classed as discretionary land-uses, allowing consultation to occur where it is considered appropriate, and local planning policy could be used to provide guidance in that regard. In general terms, officers envisage that consultation would not take place where all of the ‘deemed-to-comply’ provisions are met, but would occur where one or more of the ‘performance criteria’ needs to be considered. That is broadly consistent with the approach set out by the State in the R-Codes. It is envisaged this change would be advanced as part of planned Omnibus Amendment 6 (‘Miscellaneous Development Control Changes’).

 

CONCLUSION

 

It is recommended that the draft amended Local Planning Policy - Holiday Homes Provisions be adopted for formal advertising pursuant to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions), cl 4(1).

 

OPTIONS

 

·    Decline to support the revised Holiday Homes Provisions Policy as a basis for community consultation.

 

·    Support the revised Holiday Homes Provisions Policy as a basis for community consultation, subject to modification.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The notice of the policy and the commencement of consultation will occur within 4 weeks.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION AND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council –

 

A.  In accordance with Planning and Development(Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) -

1.   Pursuant to cl.5(1), proposes amending  City of Busselton Local Planning Policy Holiday Homes Provisions, by adopting replacement provisions provided as Attachment B to the agenda report as a draft for consultation.

2.   Pursuant to cl.4(1)(a), advertises the above proposed amended City of Busselton Local Planning Policy Holiday Homes Provisions, by notice in a newspaper circulating in the Scheme area and inviting submissions to be made within a period of 21 days from the date of publication of the notice.

 

B.  Foreshadows a future amendment to the Local Planning Scheme that would narrow the circumstances in which the Scheme would require compulsory consultation on applications for approval of holiday homes.

 


Council

12

13 September 2017

10.1

Attachment a

Local Planning Policy 7C Holiday Homes Provisions

 


 




Council

20

13 September 2017

10.1

Attachment b

7C Holiday Homes Provisions

 

7C. HOLIDAY HOMES PROVISIONS

 

1.0      BACKGROUND

 

The City of Busselton is a popular destination for tourists and holiday makers and has a large number of Holiday Homes, which are essentially residential houses and units which are utilised to accommodate these visitors. Holiday Home rentals are an important aspect of the tourism industry in the District, and have long been an important part of local and Western Australian lifestyle and culture.

 

Over time, however, there have been changes in the character of the communities in which Holiday Homes are located, as well as increased commercialisation of Holiday Homes and their use. Amongst other factors, that has led to the development by the City, cognisant of guidance provided at a State level, of a regulatory regime for Holiday Homes.

 

Holiday Homes which are utilised on a commercial basis (i.e. rented out to paying guests) require a development approval to be issued under the Local Planning Scheme and a registration to be issued under the Holiday Homes Local Law 2012. These policy provisions provide guidance to the City, as well as to applicants, landowners and the community, in relation to the City’s exercising of discretion in making decisions on Holiday Home applications pursuant to the Local Planning Scheme.

 

 

2.0       OBJECTIVES

 

The objectives of these provisions are to –

 

1.         Provide clear guidance regarding the assessment of applications for development approval for Holiday Homes;

 

2.         Identify circumstances in which Holiday Homes will be supported, and circumstances in which holiday homes may be supported, given more detailed consideration; and

 

3.         Balance the interests of residents, Holiday Home owners and the community as a whole.

 

 

3.0       APPLICATION

 

These policy provisions are adopted pursuant to Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, Schedule 2 (Deemed Provisions) clause 4 and apply to the whole of the City.

 

This policy only applies to Holiday Homes that are being made available for short stay rental purposes for commercial gain. Holiday Homes utilised only for personal use are excluded from this policy.

 

These provisions should be read in conjunction with the Local Planning Scheme and the Holiday Homes Local Law 2012.

 


 

4.0       INTERPRETATION

 

As per Schedule 1 of the Scheme the following interpretations are relevant:

 

“Holiday Home (Multiple/Grouped Dwelling)” means a grouped dwelling or multiple dwelling, which may also be used for short stay accommodation for hire or reward for no more than six people (but does not include a bed and breakfast, chalet development, guesthouse, rural tourist accommodation or tourist accommodation).

 

“Holiday Home (Single House)” means a single house (excluding ancillary accommodation), which may also be used for short stay accommodation for hire or reward for no more than 12 people (but does not include a bed and breakfast, chalet development, guesthouse, rural tourist accommodation or tourist accommodation).

 

Note: the terms ‘multiple dwelling’, ‘grouped dwelling’ and ‘single house’ are defined in the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia.

 

The following additional interpretations are relevant to this policy:

 

“Holiday Home” means both a Holiday Home (Multiple/Grouped Dwelling) and/or a Holiday Home (Single House).

 

“Deemed-to-comply” means a provision which, if satisfied, means that a Holiday Home is deemed compliant with respect to the matters subject of that provision. The local government shall not refuse to grant approval to an application where the application satisfies all of the relevant deemed-to-comply provisions.

 

“Performance criteria” means provisions to be used in the preparation, submission and assessment of development proposals for the purpose of determining their acceptability, where they do not meet the relevant deemed-to-comply provisions.

 

Note: applications that do not meet all of the ‘deemed-to-comply’ provisions would be assessed against the relevant ‘performance criteria’ (i.e. they would only be assessed against the latter in relation to those aspects to which they do not meet the former). So if the ‘car parking’ deemed-to-comply provisions are met, but the ‘dwelling design’ ones are not, dwelling design related issues would require assessment against the dwelling design performance criteria, but the car parking related issues would not require assessment against the car parking related performance criteria. Similarly, if the potable water elements of the ‘utility servicing’ deemed-to-comply provisions are met, but the refuse collection ones are not, it is only the refuse collection issues that need to be considered against the directly related performance criteria.

 

 

5.0      POLICY STATEMENT

 

Note that the headings below do form part of the policy statement.

 

5.1      Location of Holiday Homes

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the deemed-to-comply provisions if:

 

C1.1    The Holiday Home is located within an existing, lawful dwelling (other than a dwelling approved as a second dwelling or rural worker’s dwelling pursuant to clause 4.5 (f) or (g) of the Local Planning Scheme, or equivalent clause in previous schemes) in the Agriculture or Viticulture and Tourism Zone; or

 

C1.2    In all other Zones, the Holiday Home has direct frontage to a public road and/or public open space and has a minimum of 350m2 exclusively for the use of the dwelling; or

 

C1.3    For a Holiday Home (Grouped/Multiple Dwelling), written support has been received by the local government from the majority of owners of properties in the complex or development within which the Holiday Home is to be located (excluding the owner of the site subject of the application, unless the applicant owns all of the properties in the complex or development).

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the performance criteria provisions if:

 

P1.1    The City is satisfied that approval of the Holiday Home is not likely to have a significant impact on the amenity of adjoining and nearby residents and would not constitute the conversion of a second dwelling or rural worker’s dwelling to a Holiday Home.

 

 

5.2      Utility Servicing

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the deemed-to-comply provisions if:

 

C2.1    The Holiday Home is connected to reticulated water, or provided with a 135,000 litre rainwater tank for the exclusive use of the Holiday Home; and

 

C2.2    The Holiday Home is located with the City’s kerbside refuse collection area; and

 

C2.3    The Holiday Home is connected to reticulated sewerage, or there is an approved on-site effluent disposal system with adequate capacity for the proposed number of occupants.

 

Note: in areas not serviced by reticulated sewerage, it should not be assumed that an existing on-site effluent disposal system approved for a single house will have sufficient capacity for the proposed number of occupants without the need for upgrading. Advice should be sought from the City’s Environmental Health staff prior to lodging an application for development approval.

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the performance criteria provisions if:

 

P2.1    The City is satisfied that the Holiday Home will have an adequate supply of potable water; and

 

P2.2    The City is satisfied that the Holiday Home will be provided with an adequate refuse collection service; and

 

P2.3    The City is satisfied that the Holiday Homes will be provided with an adequate on-site effluent disposal system (and provision of such would be a condition of any approval, to be met prior to the commencement of the use).

 


 

5.3       Car Parking

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the deemed-to-comply provisions if:

C3.1    The Holiday Home will have constructed on-site car parking bays, consistent with the size and manoeuvrability criteria set out in the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia, but with no more than any of two bays arranged one behind the other (i.e. tandem bays are permitted, with two bays one behind another, but not with a third bay behind another two), in accordance with the following rates:

 

Maximum number of occupants

Minimum number of car parking bays required

1-3

1

4-6

2

7-8

3

9-10

4

11-12

5

 

A Holiday Home satisfies performance criteria provisions if:

 

P3.1    The City is satisfied that the Holiday Home has a minimum of two constructed on-site car parking bays and, where additional car parking bays would be required to comply with C3.1 above, at least the equivalent number of cars could park on the site without the need for cars to park on the verge, in adjacent or nearby public car parking, or in visitor car parking bays within a unit complex or similar; or

 

P3.2    Where a Holiday Home is located in the ‘Business’ Zone, the City is satisfied that the Holiday Home will not have a noticeable effect on the availability of public car parking within the locality.

 

 

5.4      Dwelling Design

 

A Holiday Homes satisfies the deemed-to-comply requirements if:

 

C4.1    The Holiday Home is an existing, lawful dwelling; or

 

C4.2    If the Holiday Home is not an existing, lawful dwelling, the Holiday Home will meet all of the relevant design standards and requirements that would apply to a new dwelling on the land, including the requirements of the Local Planning Scheme (including the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia), all relevant Local Planning Policies, and all relevant Structure Plan, Activity Centre Plan and Local Development Plan provisions; and

 

C4.3    The maximum number of occupants within a Holiday Home complies with the following standards:

 

(a)       There is 5.5 square metres per occupant in each bedroom utilising beds; and

 

(b)      There is 3.5 square metres per occupant in each bedroom utilising bunks; and

 

(c)       There is sufficient bedroom space to accommodate the maximum number of occupants consistent with (a) and (b) above; and


 

C4.4    Bedrooms in a Holiday Home are provided in accordance with the following rates:

 

Maximum number of occupants

Minimum number of bedrooms required

1-2

1, or studio

3-4

2

5-8

3

9-12

4

 

C4.5    Bathrooms and toilets in a Holiday Home are provided in accordance with the following rates:

 

Maximum number of occupants

Minimum number of bathrooms/toilets required

1-6

1 bathroom and 1 toilet

7-12

1 or 2 bathrooms and 2 toilets

 

A Holiday Homes satisfies the performance criteria if C4.1 or C4.2 is met, and C4.3 and C4.5 are met; and:

 

P4.2    The City is satisfied that the dwelling design is appropriate to accommodate the proposed maximum number of occupants. In general, if C4.4 is not met, this would only be the case if there are a smaller number of relatively large bedrooms.

 

Note: the Local Planning Scheme establishes that the maximum number of occupants in a Holiday Home (Single House), regardless of the number or size of bedrooms, is 12, and the maximum number of occupants in a Holiday Home (Grouped/Multiple Dwelling) is six. The City has no discretion to approve Holiday Homes with maximum occupant numbers higher than those limits.

 

 

5.5          Bush Fire Management                                                                                                                 

 

A Holiday Home satisfies the deemed-to-comply provisions if:

 

C5.1    The Holiday Home is not on land identified as being in a bushfire prone area by an order made under section 18P of the Fire and Emergency Services Act 1998; and/or

 

C5.2    The Holiday Home is on a lot with an area of less than 1,100m2; or

 

C5.3    The Holiday Home is on land identified as being in a bushfire prone area by an order made under section 18P of the Fire and Emergency Services Act 1998 and is on a lot with an area of 1,100m2 or greater –

 

C5.3.1       An Evacuation Plan consistent with the Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas has been submitted; and

 

C5.3.2       The Holiday Home is an existing, lawful dwelling; or

 

C5.3.3       If the Holiday Home is not an existing, lawful dwelling, the Holiday Home will meet all of the relevant design standards and requirements that would apply to a new dwelling on the land pursuant to Part 10A (Bushfire risk management) of Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

Note: A dwelling on a lot of less than 1,100m2 in area is exempt from the requirements of Part 10A (Bushfire risk management) of Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

 

 

There are no performance criteria provisions in relation to bush fire management. The deemed-to-comply provisions must be met. Note that the deemed-to-comply provisions are, other than the requirement for an Evacuation Plan, the same as what would be required to either continue using an existing, lawful dwelling, or what would be required to develop a new, lawful dwelling.

 

 


Council

22

13 September 2017

10.1

Attachment c

Planning Bulletin 99

 


 


Council                                                                                      25                                                         13 September 2017

10.2           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - COUNCIL POLICY 243 - REHOMING OF IMPOUNDED DOGS AND CATS

SUBJECT INDEX:

Review of Council Policy

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Environmental Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Ranger and Emergency Services

REPORTING OFFICER:

Ranger & Emergency Services Coordinator - Ian McDowell

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Planning and Development Services - Paul Needham

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Draft Revised Policy 243 - Rehoming of Impounded Cats and Dogs

Attachment b    Current Council Policy 243 - Rehousing of Impouded Animals  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

 

PRÉCIS

 

A review of Council Policy 243 has been undertaken. The revised draft policy has been amended to make reference to the Memoranda of Understanding that have or will be entered into by the City with approved animal rescue and welfare groups such as Saving Animals from Euthanasia (SAFE) or K9 Animal Rescue Group. The revised policy also seeks to establish the waiving of registration fees, for a maximum period of 12 months, for owners of rescue dogs.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The policy was originally adopted in 2007, and was last reviewed in December 2010 at which time the policy was re-adopted in the then standard corporate format.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Pursuant to section 2.7(2)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995, a role of Council is to determine the local government’s policies.

 

Pursuant to sections 29(10) and 29(11) of the Dog Act 1976, where a dog has been impounded by the City and the dog is not claimed, or the registered owner of the dog declines to resume possession of the dog within seven days of the date of impoundment, the City may dispose or sell the dog as if it were its own.

 

Pursuant to section 34 of the Cat Act 2011, where a cat has been impounded by the City and the owner has not been identified, or the owner of the cat has not claimed it within seven working days of the date of impoundment, the City may transfer or dispose of the cat as if it were its own.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

This report proposed adoption of the revised draft Council Policy 243 as attached to this report (Attachment A). The superseded policy is at Attachment B.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The revised policy proposes waiving registration fees, for a maximum of 12 months, for dogs and cats under the immediate care of foster carers representing the rescue organisation. This would be conditional on the animal being both microchipped and sterilised.

 

Based on approximately 50 animals being rehomed through these organisations on an annual basis the cost to the City would be approximately $1,000 per year.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

No significant implications.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The draft policy aligns with and supports Council’s Key Goal Area 6 – Leadership: visionary, collaborative, accountable; and more specifically Community Objective 6.1 – governance systems, processes and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

 

The draft revised policy provides transparency in how the City rehomes dogs and cats that are otherwise unclaimed or unowned.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the Officer Recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk assessment framework. There are no significant risks identified.

 

In fact the policy itself mitigates any risks to the City associated with the rehoming of animals as the rescue groups temperament test the animals to determine their suitability for rehoming.

 

CONSULTATION

 

The review of this policy is a routine administrative process that seeks only to acknowledge recognised animal rescue and welfare groups as the City’s conduit for rehoming unclaimed or unowned dogs and cats. As such, public consultation is not considered necessary.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The City has established a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Saving Animals from Euthanasia (SAFE) for the rehoming of dogs and cats. Another MOU has been drafted to enter into a similar arrangement with K9 Animal Rescue (this will be for the rehoming of dogs only).

 

The intent of the draft revised policy is to acknowledge these MOUs are in place and that the City will only rehome unclaimed or unowned dogs and cats through these or other recognised groups. Through these arrangements, the rescue and/or welfare organisation will assess impounded animals to ensure they are suitable for rehoming. They also ensure the dogs and cats are sterilised, microchipped and vaccinated prior to rehoming.

 

By providing up to 12 months free registration for these animals, whilst they are in the care of a recognised foster carer of the organisation (within our district), a formal record of the animal is created in our registration data base. This will help to ensure the ongoing registration of the animal through our normal administrative processes of sending out renewal notices and then if necessary, following up with the last known owner of the animal if the registration lapses.

 

CONCLUSION

 

An internal review of Council Policy 243 – Rehousing of Rescued Animals has been completed. It has been renamed “Rehoming of Impounded Dogs and Cats”, and acknowledges the establishment and use of formal Memorandums of Understanding with recognised animal rescue and welfare groups to facilitate the rehoming of suitable dogs and cats.

 

OPTIONS

 

Council may amend or not endorse the revised draft policy.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The revised draft policy will be presented to Council on 13 September 2017, and will take effect immediately following its adoption by Council.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION AND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council endorse revised Council Policy 243 – Rehoming of Impounded Dogs and Cats as shown in attachment A. 

 


Council

26

13 September 2017

10.2

Attachment a

Draft Revised Policy 243 - Rehoming of Impounded Cats and Dogs

 


Council

27

13 September 2017

10.2

Attachment b

Current Council Policy 243 - Rehousing of Impouded Animals

 


Council                                                                                      30                                                         13 September 2017

10.3           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - CONSOLIDATED PARKING SCHEME AMENDMENT - PRIES AVENUE, BUSSELTON

SUBJECT INDEX:

Minor Parking Scheme Amendments

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Creative urban design that produces vibrant, mixed-use town centres and public spaces.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Environmental Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Ranger and Emergency Services

REPORTING OFFICER:

Senior Prosecutions and Policy Officer - Owen Anderton

Ranger & Emergency Services Coordinator - Ian McDowell

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Manager Environmental Services - Tanya Gillett

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Correspondence received

Attachment b    Diagram  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

 

PRÉCIS

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council endorsement of a proposed variation to the City’s Consolidated Parking Scheme to create a no stopping/parking area along the west side of Pries Avenue, between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The City’s Consolidated Vehicle Parking Scheme (the Scheme) is periodically reviewed and amended from time to time, thereby ensuring that the Scheme remains current.

 

The City received a request from the proprietor of Paradise Motor Inn, situated at 6 Pries Avenue, Busselton, to install a stopping/parking area along the west side of Pries Avenue, between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

 

The correspondent has observed over a two year period numerous traffic related incidences caused by vehicles parking on the west side of the road in Pries Avenue.  Vehicles parking on the western side of Pries Avenue are creating a hazard for pedestrians and road traffic using Pries Avenue.  See attached correspondence.

 

There is currently 90 degree on-street parking on the eastern side of Pries Avenue. The City’s Design and Survey team has determined that, according to relevant Australian Standards, the width of Pries Avenue is not sufficient to accommodate vehicles parking on both sides of the road in the current configuration. 

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Council designates parking and traffic restrictions under the powers of the Parking Local Law 2011 (the Local Law). The designation of parking stalls, stations and areas occurs under Part 2 of the Local Law; and the Scheme (a large series of plans identifying the location and type of parking restrictions in detail) is adopted pursuant to Part 2, as a means to identify these designations. Designations are given practical effect through on-ground signage and line marking, as well as the issue of public notices.

 

Section 2.1(1)(g) of the Local Law states: “That Council may, constitute, determine or vary permitted classes of vehicles which may park in specified parking stalls, parking stations and parking areas”. This report seeks to make a variation through the establishment of no stopping/parking areas along the west side of Pries Avenue between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

 

Where Council makes a determination to establish or amend a parking stall, parking stations and parking areas under the Local Law, the Chief Executive Officer must give local public notice of, and erect signs to give effect to the determination.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

There are no relevant plans and policies associated with this matter.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Resources required for implementation of the local law, that is to mark parking bays and or zones with paint and installing signs on posts, are provided for within the City’s overall operational budget and can be achieved without any effect on other operational areas.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

There are no long-term financial implications associated with this matter.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The recommendation of this report reflects Community Objective 2.3 of the Strategic Community Plan 2017 to ”create urban design, that produces vibrant, mixed use town centres and public spaces”.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the Officer Recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk assessment framework. There are no significant risks identified.

 

CONSULTATION

 

In preparing this report the City has consulted with the owners and occupiers of the properties on the western side of Pries Avenue.  The City wrote to the owners seeking feedback and submissions.    All respondents agreed to the proposed changes to the Scheme.  The eastern side of Pries Avenue is Victoria Square.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

Pries Avenue experiences significant pedestrian and vehicle traffic flow as well as vehicle parking particularly on the eastern side where there are 2 parking bays for the disabled and 31 all day car parking bays.  This area is close to the main Busselton shopping precinct, the Senior Citizens Centre and the Orana Cinema.  There is no footpath on Pries Avenue and pedestrians walking to and from the Orana Cinema and shopping precinct walk on the Pries Avenue carriageway.

 

CONCLUSION

 

That Council endorse the proposed amendments to the City’s Consolidated Parking Scheme to establish a no stopping/parking area along the west side of Pries Avenue between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

 

OPTIONS

 

Council may support or amend the officer recommendations to vary parking controls in Pries Avenue or pursue alternative solutions.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

Where Council makes a determination to establish or amend a parking stall, parking stations and parking areas under the Parking Local Law 2011, the CEO must give local public notice of, and erect signs to give effect to, the determination. Subject to Council endorsement of the officer recommendations, local public notice will be advertised and appropriate signage erected as soon as is practicable following Council endorsement.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council:

1.    Amends the Consolidated Parking Scheme, pursuant to the City of Busselton Parking Local Law 2011 to establish a no stopping/parking area along the west side of Pries Avenue between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

2.    Endorses the CEO to give local public notice of the determination as required by the City of Busselton Parking Local Law 2011.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council:

 

1.      Does not amend the Consolidated Parking Scheme, pursuant to the City of Busselton Parking Local Law 2011 to establish a no stopping/parking area along the west side of Pries Avenue between Peel Terrace and Albert Street.

2.      The proprietor of Paradise Motor Inn be thanked for his submission and advised accordingly.

 


Council

31

13 September 2017

10.3

Attachment a

Correspondence received

 



 


Council

34

13 September 2017

10.3

Attachment b

Diagram

 


Council                                                                                      37                                                         13 September 2017

10.4           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF POLICY 236 RATING

SUBJECT INDEX:

Policy Budget and Administration

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Financial Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Rates

REPORTING OFFICER:

Rates Coordinator - David Whitfield

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Existing Policy 236 Rating  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

 

PRÉCIS

 

As part of the ongoing policy review process a review of the existing Rating Policy has been conducted.  The current policy was originally adopted in 2006 and reviewed in September 2011 with no changes being made.  Since that time the Department of Local Government and Communities (DLGC) has published several policy and guideline documents that override/duplicate many of the components of Council’s 2011 Rating Policy.  This item seeks to cancel the current policy to avoid unnecessary duplication as more suitable guidelines exist reflecting the rating functions of Local Government.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The current policy was written at a time where there was no specific guidance from the DLGC on rating matters generally, however, from 2011 onwards the following policies and guidelines have been developed and issued by the DLGC for local governments to follow with respect to their rating processes:

 

·    DLGC Policy – Valuation of Land

·    DLGC Policy – Differential Rates

·    DLGC Policy – Minimum Payments

·    DLGC Policy – Rateable Land

·    DLGC Policy – Giving Notice (Advertising of Rates)

·    DLGC Guidelines: Possession of Land for Recovery of Rates and Service Charges

·    DLGC Guidelines – Changing Methods of Valuation of Land

 

A number of these policies have been reviewed as recently as November 2016.

 

These guidelines exist to provide commentary in relation to the provisions of the Local Government Act at Division 6 – Rates and Service Charges.

 

In light of the introduction of these policies/guidelines it is considered that the existing rating policy is no longer required and as such should be cancelled and deleted from the City’s Policy Manual.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

In accordance with Section 2.7(2)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 it is the role of the Council to determine the local government’s policies.  The Council does this on the recommendation of a Committee it has established in accordance with Section 5.8 of that Act.

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

This report proposes to cancel the existing Rating Policy as the policy currently unnecessarily duplicates Statewide guidelines and policies provided by the Department of Local Government and Communities.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no financial implications arising from the cancellation of this policy.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

There are no long-term financial implications arising from the cancellation of this policy.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

This policy aligns with and supports the Council’s Key Goal Area 6 – ‘Leadership’ and more specifically Community Objective 6.1 – ‘Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent’.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

There is no associated risk with the cancellation of the Rating policy.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Not applicable.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The current policy covers rating methods and practices that, upon review, have generally been in place for over 20 years if not longer and are based on the rating provisions of the 1995 Local Government Act.  As such the current rating practices are both stable and well tested over that time.  The current policy was introduced in 2006 and re-adopted in 2011 with no recommended change.

 

It is proposed to cancel the Policy as it is now considered redundant as the subject matter is now covered by the new Department of Local Government and Communities policy documents. 

 

CONCLUSION

 

The Department of Local Government and Communities now provides specific policy advice and guidelines for Local Governments to follow and it is considered appropriate that these documents be followed.  Further, in view of this, it is considered that there is no need for a Rating Policy and as a consequence it should be cancelled.

 

OPTIONS

 

The Council could:

 

1.    Choose not to cancel the existing Rating Policy and allow the policy to remain in place, or

 

2.    Choose to seek further review and/or amendment to the existing Rating Policy for presentation to Council at a later date.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The cancellation of the existing Rating Policy would be effective immediately upon the adoption of the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council cancels Policy 236 Rating and remove it from the City’s Policy Manual.

 


Council

41

13 September 2017

10.4

Attachment a

Existing Policy 236 Rating

 


 


 


 


Council                                                                                      45                                                         13 September 2017

10.5           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - POLICY - AASB124 RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

SUBJECT INDEX:

Policies, Plans and Procedure

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Finance and Corporate Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

 Finance and Corporate Services

REPORTING OFFICER:

Manager Financial Services - Kim Dolzadelli

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Draft AASB124 Related Party Disclosure Policy  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

PRÉCIS

 

The purpose of this report is for Council to consider a new policy regarding Related Party Disclosures.

 

A copy of the proposed policy is attached and outlines the City’s disclosure requirements in regard to the existence of relationships regardless of whether or not any transaction has occurred, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard AASB124 (Related Party Disclosures).

 

BACKGROUND

 

The scope of Australian Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard AASB124 (Related Party Disclosures) was amended in July 2015 to encompass not for profit entities including local governments. AASB124 now imposes a number of obligations upon elected members and senior City staff in relation to disclosure of their financial dealings with related parties. These obligations come into effect for the 2016-17 financial year for Local Government and the information is to be disclosed as a note within future Annual Financial Statements.

 

The primary objective of AASB124 is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain disclosures necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and potential profit or loss (surplus or deficit) may have been affected by the existence of related parties and their transactions

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

AASB124 imposes a number of obligations upon Elected Members and senior City staff in relation to disclosure of their financial dealings with related parties. These obligations come into effect for the 2016-17 financial year with information to be disclosed as a note within the 2016-17 (and subsequent) Annual Financial Statements.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

Council through the Policy and Legislation committee is being requested to adopt a new Policy with respect to “AASB124 Related Party Disclosures”.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are only minor administrative costs with respect to compliance and reporting related to the requirements of AASB124 Related Party Disclosures requirements; these costs will see no impact on Council’s financial position.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

Nil

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The draft policy aligns with and supports Council’s Key Goal Area 6.1 “Governance Systems, processes and practices are responsible ethical and transparent”.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

There is no known risk in Council adopting the attached Policy.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Council’s Auditor has been consulted with respect to the impact and requirements of AASB124 Related Party Disclosures.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The objective of AASB124 is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain disclosures necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and any profit or loss may have been affected by the existence of related parties and transactions with those parties.

 

This means that readers of the City of Busselton Annual Financial Statements will become aware of any relationships that may affect the financial position and profit or loss of the City. The Annual Financial Statements provide information at a summary level of the financial remuneration of related parties, key management personnel and the financial value of transactions with related parties such as services or goods purchased from businesses operated by related parties.

 

Individual financial details of related parties are not disclosed during the reporting process, and the transactions are presented as aggregated information in the financial reports.

 

The information collated and aggregated from the Annual Financial Statements is proposed to be obtained a Related Party Declaration form, which forms an appendix to the draft policy.

 

The Policy proposes that Key Management Personnel be required to complete this form twice each financial year in December and June, and upon resignation.

 

Disclosure requirements apply to the existence of relationships regardless of whether or not any transaction has occurred. Each financial year, the City of Busselton must make an informed judgement as to what is considered to be a related party, and what transactions should be considered when determining if disclosure is required.

 

AASB 124 advises that if a local government has had related party transactions during a financial year, it shall disclose the nature of the related party relationship as well as information about those transactions, including commitments, that are necessary for users to understand the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements.

To progress the implementation of AASB 124 for 2016-17 as required, Council is required to consider and adopt the following, which are contained within the policy:

 

1.            Positions to be included as Key Management Personnel (KMP) in the assessment of related parties; and

2.            Transactions that are considered to be Ordinary Citizen Transactions (OCT) that will not be included as related party transactions.

 

Key Management Personnel

 

AASB 124 specifically includes Elected Members as part of the definition of Key Management Personnel (KMP). It is expected that in local government, KMP will include Elected Members, the Chief Executive Officer and the next level of management, which in the case of the City is Directors.

 

Ordinary Citizen Transactions

 

In order to identify which transactions are related party transactions and subject to disclosure it is necessary to consider and exclude Ordinary Citizen Transactions (OCT) from disclosure requirements.

 

OCTs are those transactions provided on terms and conditions no different to those applying to the general public and are unlikely to influence the decisions that users of the City’s financial statements make.  These Ordinary Citizen Transactions include the following:

 

•      Using the council’s facilities after paying the normal fee;

•      Fines on normal terms and conditions; and

•      Paying rates and council fees and charges.

 

There is no obligation to disclose Ordinary Citizen Transactions.  Transactions between the City and Related Parties that would normally be considered Ordinary Citizen Transactions but where the terms and conditions differ from normal practice however must be disclosed (if material).

 

The exclusion of the above effectively limits the related party transactions that are to be declared to typically be:

 

·    purchases of sales or goods (finished or unfinished);

·    purchases or sales of property or other assets;

·    rendering or receiving services;

·    leases;

·    transfers under finance arrangements (including loans and equity contributions in cash or kind);

·    provisions of guarantees or collateral;

·    commitments to do something if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future, including execution of contracts (recognised or unrecognised); and

·    settlement of liabilities on behalf of Council or by Council on behalf of the related party.

 

It should be noted that the value of the transactions must be material, for the purpose of the attached Draft Policy, it is considered appropriate to set a dollar value of $5,000 for any individual transaction or $25,000 for collective transactions to determine materiality.

 

These transactions do not include those where members of the Key Management Personnel have a connection as a member of a community group that has a relationship with the City.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

Officers believe that adoption of the attached Policy will provided guidance to all effected Key Management Personnel (KMP) with respect to AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures.  Whilst legislation does not require a Policy in relation AASB124, the Department of Local Government and Communities suggests that councils adopt a policy.

 

OPTIONS

 

Council could choose to:

 

1.    Adopt the attached Policy with or without amendment, or

2.    Not adopt the attached Policy – but it is desirable to have a policy on this subject.

3.   

In any event, disclosure is required to be made in the Financial Statements.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

If adopted, the Draft Policy will be put in place immediately.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts the AASB124 Related Party Disclosure draft policy shown at Attachment A.

 


Council

52

13 September 2017

10.5

Attachment a

Draft AASB124 Related Party Disclosure Policy

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council                                                                                      55                                                         13 September 2017

10.6           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF POLICY 001 - FEES, ALLOWANCES AND EXPENSES FOR ELECTED MEMBERS

SUBJECT INDEX:

Councillor

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Finance and Corporate Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

 Council & Councillor Service

REPORTING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Absolute Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Revised Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members

Attachment b    Revised Policy 001 – Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members - Tracked Changes  

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

 

PRÉCIS

 

It is appropriate to review Policy 001 – Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members so that it reflects current practice. 

 

BACKGROUND

 

As part of the regular review of Council Policies, it is apparent that there is a need to review Council Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members so that it reflects current and appropriate practice.

 

The issue of ‘Corporate Attire’ has been informally discussed by Councillors at a Budget briefing held on 31 May 2017 and more recently at an elected members briefing held on Wednesday 26 July 2107. The subject of mileage claims has also been discussed at an Elected Member briefing held on 7 June 2017. The content of this discussion was detailed in an email to all Councillors dated 9 June 2017. The policy has been amended based on all of these discussions.

 

The changes referred to above and considered by Councillors are now reflected in the proposed new policy. In addition, minor other changes to the policy are proposed and are reflected in the Policy at Attachment B. Further details of the changes proposed are contained in the “Comment” section of this report.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

In accordance with Section 2.7(2)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 it is the role of the Council to determine the Local Government’s policies.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

This report recommends that Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members be updated to take into account informal discussions held at a recent Budget Meeting, Elected Member briefing session and changes to reflect current practice.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are only minor financial implications associated with the changes proposed to the Policy.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

Nil

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The Strategic Community Plan includes the community objective of having an effectively managed organisation that achieves positive outcomes for the community.  One of the key ways for this to occur is to provide financial recognition of the extensive responsibilities performed by Elected Members.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

Not required for this policy review.

 

CONSULTATION

 

The major changes to this Policy have previously been discussed with Councillors at informal meetings.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

As part of the regular review of Council Policies it has been recognised that there is a need to review Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected members in the following areas to reflect current and appropriate practice.

 

Ø Clause 3.1.1 – provision of equipment

 

This clause has been changed by the inclusion of a brief case / satchel for use by elected members.

 

Ø Clause 3.1.5 - Reimbursement of travel expenses

 

Numerous changes have been made to reflect discussions held at an Elected Members briefing session held on 7 June 2107. The changes made reflect an appropriate and balanced approach to mileage claims and detail the circumstances under which elected members may make claims for reimbursement of costs incurred whilst representing the City on Council business.

 

Ø 3.1.7.2 Corporate attire

 

The Policy has been amended by the inclusion of what is meant by the expression “Corporate attire” and was the subject of discussions held at the Budget Workshop held on 31 May 2107. The basic premise is that elected members should first acquire ‘Corporate attire’ as described and any balance of funds available may be used for purchase of additional ‘business attire’. The annual amount has been reduced (from $1,000pa) but the allowance for the brief case / satchel has been moved to clause 3.1.1 of the Policy referred to above.

 

Minor other changes have been made to the Policy and these are identified by reference to the ‘tracked changes’ version of the Policy shown at Attachment B.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

The policy is presented for updating, noting that an Absolute Majority is required as this Policy as it includes reference to the annual allowance paid to the Mayor and the percentage of the Mayor’s allowance to which the Deputy Mayor will be entitled. However no changes are proposed to be made to these particular Policy provisions. The actual amount of the Mayors allowance (and therefore the Deputy Mayors allowance) is considered by Council when the annual budget is adopted.

 

The majority of the changes have been discussed with elected members on a number of occasions in recent months.

 

OPTIONS

 

Changes to the proposed Policy can be considered and modified, however, the budget has been developed in accordance with the allowances described, taking into account the cost of clothing and travel reimbursement.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The new policy adopted will be effective immediately.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the revised Council Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members as shown in Attachment A be adopted.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

ABSOLUTE MAJORITY DECISION OF COUNCIL REQUIRED

That the Council:

 

1.    Adopt the revised Council Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members as shown in Attachment A which excludes proposed changes to clause 3.1.7.2 Corporate Attire; and

 

2.    Consider a further report relating to clause 3.1.7.2 Corporate Attire at a future meeting.

 


Council

61

13 September 2017

10.6

Attachment a

Revised Policy 001 - Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members

 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

68

13 September 2017

10.6

Attachment b

Revised Policy 001 – Fees, Allowances and Expenses for Elected Members - Tracked Changes

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council                                                                                      75                                                         13 September 2017

10.7           Policy and Legislation Committee - 17/08/2017 - REVIEW OF WORKING GROUPS

SUBJECT INDEX:

Council and Committee Meetings

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Finance and Corporate Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

 Governance support

REPORTING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Absolute Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Nil

 

This item was considered by the Policy and Legislation Committee at its meeting on 17 August 2017, the recommendations from which have been included in this report. 

 

PRÉCIS

 

This report proposes that the Council reviews whether or not to retain its non statutory Committees/Groups and determines whether it requires those Committees/Groups to continue in their present form or in a different form for the term of the next Council commencing in October 2017.  This review includes the City’s internal working groups and participation of Councillors on various external groups.

 

The practice of appointing Councillors to Standing working groups, internal groups and external organisations will necessarily be dealt with after the Council election to be held on Saturday, 21 October, 2017.  Memberships of the various Committees and working groups will be determined at a Special Meeting of Council that is scheduled to occur on Monday, 23 October, 2017.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Council over the years has formed many working Committees and working groups to assist with progressing various works and services through the development and implementation stages of many initiatives. In addition, Council is also represented on many local community committees and working groups principally to provide a link between Council and members of the organisation.

 

It is appropriate to review, on a regular basis, whether or not the Council and working groups  are still performing the function originally designed to achieve and whether membership of the community groups is warranted.

 

This report recommends that Council reviews the need for a wide range of Working Groups to continue to exist and whether membership to external organisations is necessary.

 

The list of working groups and other organisations on which Councillors are currently represented together with brief comments on their need and status is as follows:

 

City-formed Groups

Proposed action

Administration Building Working Group

The group assists the CEO and Project Manager with decisions relating to the building program and interior design for the new administration and civic centre.

Delete – Building completed – no longer required


Busselton Jetty Reference Group

The reference group includes three Councillors, three members of the Busselton Jetty Inc and City officers for jetty-related discussions.

Retain – Reference Group performs important function and provides link to City’s most important asset and local community group

Local Planning Strategies Reference Group

A discussion forum for the development and review of local planning strategies following the implementation of the new town planning scheme.

Delete – This role and issues previously considered by this Group now replaced by discussion at Council briefing sessions

Waste Advisory Group

The group participates in the development of strategies, both local and regional, for the future management of waste.

Retain – Advisory Group performs important function and with input to the Regional Waste Strategy

Waterways Improvement Reference Group

The group assists with strategies relating to improvement of the Vasse River and other local waterways.

Retain – Projects in place need to be progressed

Marketing and Events Reference Group

The group makes recommendations to Council on the allocation of marketing and events funding raised through the commercial differential rate.

Retain –  Reference Group performs important function

Busselton Wetland Project Team

The team provides guidance on the development of the Busselton Wetlands concept through education, promoting the international significance and conservation.

Delete – Has transitioned to a Friends Group with no Council appointed representative

Energy Working Group  - Could be renamed as Sustainability and Energy Working Group

The group considers the development and implementation of energy efficiency initiatives.

Retain – Working Group performs important function – recommend name change and new Terms of Reference incorporating broader scope could be considered at future meeting

Environmental Reference Group

The group assists the development and implementation of the City’s Environment Strategy and provides a forum for discussion of environmental issues.

Delete – now a wholly Community Reference Group – new status adopted by Council in April 2017 – C1704/073

Disability Access and Inclusion Plan Reference Group

The group assists with the implementation of initiatives identified in the Disability Access and Inclusion Plan.

Retain – Reference Group performs important function

Performing Arts / Convention Centre Working Group

The group is charged with the responsibility of developing a business case to demonstrate the feasibility and viability of a future Performing Arts / Convention Centre.

Retain – Committee performs important function – and will need to exist as project progresses.

Vasse Recreational Facilities Working Group

This Group exists to assist with the development of recreational facilities at Vasse.

Retain – Working group meets regularly as facilities continue to be planned and developed

Local Emergency Management Committee

Retain - Committee performs important function

 

 

 

Ministerial appointments

 

Yallingup Land Conservation District Committee (LCDC)

The Councillor is appointed by the Minister to assist in Land Conservation initiatives in the Yallingup area.

Retain - Committee performs important function

Development Assessment Panel

The Councillors are appointed by the Minister to the DAP which is charged with considering development applications above a certain value instead of the Council.

Retain - Committee performs statutory function

Lower Vasse Taskforce Committee – Geo Catchment

 

 

Retain – Committee performs important function

 

 

External Groups

 

Busselton Senior Citizens' Centre Board

The Councillor participates on the Board of Management established to run the Busselton Senior Citizens’ Centre in accordance with Boards Constitution.

Retain – Committee performs important function

GeoCatch

The Board implements priority natural resource management action in the Geographe catchment area.

Retain – Committee performs important function

Regional Roads Group - MRWWA

The group exists to prioritise and resolve projects for the allocation of monies received by the RRG from State and Federal Government car-related taxes.

Retain – Committee performs important function

Citizens' Advice Bureau

Offers an information and referral service that is free, confidential, impartial and community-based.

Delete – Board has resigned

Busselton and Sugito Sister Cities Association

The incorporated association manages the Sister City relationship with Sugito, Japan and arranges adult and youth exchanges.

Retain – Committee performs important function

Port Geographe Community Consultation Forum

The liaison group includes State Government representatives and local residents to discuss Port Geographe Harbor and Groyne issues

Delete – Forum no longer operational since Groyne works completed

South West Zone Local Government Association

The association of 12 South West Local Governments that meets to consider WA Local Government Association initiatives.

Retain – Committee performs important function

Busselton Historical Society

The society provides information on the history of the Busselton region to the public and runs the museum.

Retain – Committee performs important function

Rails to Trails

Now called Wadandi Track Steering Committee

The group consists of representatives from the City and Shire of Augusta-Margaret River to oversee the development of the master plan for the Wadandi Track.

Delete – The rail-trail from Busselton to Augusta has moved from the Planning phase and is now in the implementation phase and works are now subject to annual budget allocations.

Higher Education Forum – now known as CQU Advisory Group

The group investigates opportunities for the provision of higher education facilities and programs in the City of Busselton.

Retain – particularly as CQU is now in ‘Growth mode’

Naturaliste Roadwise Committee – now known as Roadwise Committee

Formerly had the responsibility for Undertaking school leavers education program about the dangers of drink driving, advocated for the reduction of speed limits and provided roundabout education.

Retain under new name ‘Roadwise Committee’ which reviews Roadwise issues over whole City district.

Rural Clinical School

The School has the explicit goal of attracting more doctors to regional, rural and remote practice. 

Delete


 

Sea Change Taskforce (now called Australian Coastal Councils’ Association) and Peron-Naturaliste Partnership (PNP)

The ACCA runs events and an annual conference to discuss issues of importance to coastal local governments.  The objective of the PNP is to provide a regional mechanism to facilitate effective adaptation responses to climate change.

Retain – Committee performs important function. City represented by two Councillors and Director Planning & Development Services

 

Those Groups that are not proposed to be re-established in their present form are as follows:

 

Ø Administration Building Working Group

Ø Local Planning Strategies Reference Group

Ø Busselton Wetland Project Team

Ø Environmental Reference Group

Ø Citizens' Advice Bureau

Ø Port Geographe Community Consultation Forum

Ø Rails to Trails  - Steering Committee

Ø Naturaliste Roadwise Committee

Ø Rural Clinical School

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Under Section 5.8 of the Local Government Act 1995 (LG Act), a local government, by absolute majority, may establish Committees of three or more persons to assist the Council, and to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the local government that can be delegated to committees.

 

Separately, Section 5.10 and 5.11A of the LG Act relates to the appointment of Committee members and Deputy Committee members.  It is noted that these requirements will be dealt with at a separate meeting following the election.

 

Section 5.16 of the LG Act also applies, whereby a local government may delegate to a Committee any of its powers and duties, other than this power of delegation.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

Appointing members of the Council to Committees is subject to the requirements of Council Policy 014 – Convening the Council Following an Election.

 

A Special Meeting of the Council will be convened on the Monday evening immediately following the ordinary election day.  The proceedings will commence with the “Swearing In” ceremony for newly elected members who need to make a declaration. Once this has occurred, consideration of membership of the Council’s Committees and the appointment of Council delegates to other various groups can commence.

 

This report provides the opportunity for the Councillors who have participated in all of the Committees in the past two years to review their operation and make a decision as to whether the Committees should continue during the term of the next Council.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Apart from minor representation costs, there are no financial implications associated with the proposal to review Committees and working groups.

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The practice of matters being considered by various Committees and working groups established by the Council contributes to Governance systems that deliver responsible, ethical and accountable decision-making.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

Risk

Controls

Consequence

Likelihood

Risk Level

Committees consider matters outside of their scope or Committee members fail to recognise interests

Provision of advice and officer attendance at various Committee meetings

Minor

Possible

Medium

 

CONSULTATION

 

No external consultation required.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The vast majority of Committees and Working Groups are recommended to continue intact or be merged to consolidate activities. There are however a number of Committees / Working Groups that are proposed not to continue or have a name change to reflect their present role. These are:

 

Ø Administration Building Working Group

Ø Local Planning Strategies Reference Group

Ø Busselton Wetland Project Team

Ø Energy reference Group – could be renamed Sustainability & Energy Reference Group

Ø Environmental Reference Group

Ø Citizens' Advice Bureau

Ø Port Geographe Community Consultation Forum

Ø Rails to Trails  - now called Wadandi Track Steering Committee

Ø Naturaliste Roadwise Committee – now called Roadwise Committee

Ø Rural Clinical School

 

CONCLUSION

 

The Council is requested to assess the effectiveness of its Committee system over the past two years and to make a determination as to those Committees and working groups it requires to continue.

 

OPTIONS

 

The Council may determine that it does not require any or all of these Committees and working groups, with the exception of the Audit Committee, or may require changes to be made to any of the terms of reference.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

Members will be appointed to any Committees that the Council establishes at a Special Meeting of Council scheduled for 19 October, 2015.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council:

 

1.      Retains the following working/reference/advisory groups:

 

Busselton Jetty Reference Group

Waste Advisory Group

Waterways Improvement Reference Group

Marketing and Events Reference Group

Disability Access and Inclusion Plan Reference Group

Performing Arts / Convention Centre Working Group

Vasse Recreational Facilities Working Group

 

2.      Endorses name changes to the following Committees /groups:

 

Existing name                                                   Proposed name

Energy Working Group                                 Sustainability & Energy Working Group

Naturaliste Roadwise Committee             Roadwise Committee

 

3.      Endorses the participation of Councillors on the following external Committees/ groups:

Busselton Senior Citizens' Centre Board

GeoCatch

Regional Roads Group

Busselton and Sugito Sister Cities Association

WALGA – SW Zone

Busselton Historical Society

CQU Advisory Group

Australian Coastal Councils’ Association and Peron-Naturaliste Partnership (PNP)

 

4.      Notes that the following Committees require the members nomination to be approved by the relevant Minister:

Yallingup Land Conservation District Committee (LCDC)

Development Assessment Panel

Lower Vasse Taskforce Committee Geo catchment

 

5.      Notes that the following Committees / groups are no longer required:

Administration Building Working Group

Local Planning Strategies Reference Group

Busselton Wetland Project Team

Environmental Reference Group

Citizens' Advice Bureau

Port Geographe Community Consultation Forum

Rural Clinical School

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

                                                                ABSOLUTE MAJORITY DECISION REQUIRED

 

That the Council adopts the Officer Recommendation and in addition notes that the Higher Education Forum – now known as CQU Advisory Group is no longer required.

 


 

Note:

At the P & L Committee discussion occurred on 3 Committees not included in the report for review. This advice updates members on the status of these committees.

 

Western Ringtail Possum Working Group

Phoebe Abbey House Working Group

 

These Working parties are not affected by any review as they have been specifically created as Working Groups formed by the CEO in order to assist in the management and direction of activities associated with them. Interested Councillors are invited to attend the meetings and are not appointed by Council. As a consequence, Councillors who attend these meetings do not need to be

‘re-appointed’ by Council as Council has not appointed them to the Working Group.

 

Community Resource Centre Working Group

 

It is acknowledged that this Group meets on a regular basis and continues to operate. This Working Group will be listed as one of those Groups whose membership will be reviewed at the Special Meeting of Council to be held on Monday 23rd October, 2017 following the election process.  


Council                                                                                      84                                                         13 September 2017

11.             Planning and Development Services Report

11.1           PROPOSED SCHEME AMENDMENT 27 TO LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME 21 AND DRAFT STRUCTURE PLAN FOR LOT 10 COMMONAGE ROAD, DUNSBOROUGH

SUBJECT INDEX:

Town Planning Schemes and  Amendments

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Planning strategies that foster the development of healthy neighbourhoods that meet our needs as we grow.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Strategic Planning and Development Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Strategic Planning

REPORTING OFFICER:

Principal Strategic Planner - Louise Koroveshi

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Planning and Development Services - Paul Needham

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Location Plan

Attachment b    District Open Space Concept Plan

Attachment c    Existing Zoning

Attachment d   Proposed Zoning

Attachment e    Proposed Structure Plan Extract

Attachment f    Endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan

Attachment g   Proposed Overall Structure Plan

Attachment h   BAL Contour Map  

  

PRÉCIS

 

The Council is requested to consider initiating for public consultation Amendment 27 to Local Planning Scheme 21 (LPS21). The Amendment seeks to rezone Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough from ‘Reserve for Public Purposes’ to ‘Special Purpose (Dunsborough Lakes Development Area)’ and amend Schedule 3 – ‘Special Provision Areas’ to include the subject land within Special Provision Area No. 42. Modifications to the endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan are also proposed that reflect land use changes sought through the Amendment.

 

The proposed would allow residential subdivision to occur in the southern part of the site.

 

The proposal will also help facilitate the subdivision and acquisition of a 7.56 hectare northern portion of Lot 10 by the City for the future development of district-level sporting and active recreation ovals and associated infrastructure.

 

Officers are recommending that the Council adopts the Amendment and Structure Plan for initiation and consultation, which will include referral to the EPA and relevant State Government agencies and advertising. The Amendment is viewed as a ‘standard’ amendment for the purposes of Part 5 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The proposal comprises a Scheme amendment and modifications to the endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan. The subject land is approximately 20 hectares in area and is located 2km south of the Dunsborough Town Centre, adjacent to Dunsborough Lakes Estate. A location plan and aerial photograph are provided at Attachment A.

 

Lot 10 is relatively flat and partially cleared. Remnant vegetation exists predominantly through the centre of the land, along Commonage Road and in the northeast corner at Dunsborough Lakes Drive. The remainder of the site is either ‘parkland’ or wholly cleared.

 

Lot 10 is reserved in LPS21 for ‘Public Purposes (Sewer Treatment Plant)’ and is owned in freehold title by the Water Corporation. The southern portion of the site previously accommodated the Dunsborough Waste Water Treatment Plant (DWTP). The DWTP was ultimately considered surplus to operational requirements and was decommissioned in 2001, with the levelling of treatment ponds and removal of storage tanks and sludge completed by 2004. Groundwater monitoring and soil testing was undertaken to assess contamination levels. The subject land was officially reclassified as a ‘decontaminated site’ by the Department of Environmental Regulation in September 2013 and, consequently, deemed suitable for alternative ‘sensitive’ land uses such as residential and recreation.

 

The potential opportunity to utilise the northern ‘third’ (7.56 hectares) of Lot 10 for the development of two sporting and active recreation ovals and associated infrastructure in a manner that would provide a contiguous, district-level facility with a third, ‘shared use’ oval (on land to be ceded to, and developed by, the City immediately south of the future Dunsborough Lakes primary school site and east of Lot 10 on abutting Lot 9058) has been previously identified by the City. An acquisition/sale price for the northern third of the subject land has been agreed between the City and the Water Corporation, with the Council formally deciding to proceed with the purchase and finalisation/execution of the Contract of Sale at its meeting of 22 February 2017. This contract was executed on 4 May 2017 (with settlement and transfer of tenure circa June 2018, conditional upon the Gazettal of this Amendment).

 

A conceptual plan showing how a contiguous three oval and active recreational area development could be constructed across the northern third of Lot 10 (and incorporating the ‘shared use’ oval proposed alongside the future Dunsborough Lakes primary school on the adjoining property) is provided at Attachment B. Development of the first oval, the ‘shared use’ oval, is identified to occur in the 2018/19 financial year in the City’s current Long Term Financial Plan. It should be noted that at this stage the State has not allocated funds to development of the Dunsborough Lakes Primary School. Given funding cycles that means development of the school is unlikely to commence prior to 2022/23. Development of the shared use oval is not dependent upon a school funding commitment. If the oval is built before the school, as seems very likely, the Department of Education would need to negotiate access with the City, including retrospective capital contribution.

 

Each element of the proposal is outlined below under appropriate sub-headings.

 

Scheme Amendment

 

The Scheme Amendment proposes to –

 

1.    Rezone Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough from ‘Reserve for Public Purposes’ to ‘Special Purposes (Dunsborough Lakes Development Area)’.

2.    Amend Schedule 3 – ‘Special Provision Areas’ to include reference to Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough in Special Provision Area 42.

3.    Amend the boundary of Special Provision Area 42 to include the whole of the subject land.

 

Existing and proposed zoning maps are provided at Attachments C and D respectively.

 


 

Proposed Modified Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan

 

It is proposed to modify the endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan to include the whole of Lot 10 Commonage Road. The key elements of the proposed structure plan as it relates to the subject land are summarised below (Attachment E) –

 

·    Approximately 12 hectares of public open space for recreation and conservation.

·    Approximately 7 hectares of residential land that will yield 102 residential lots ranging in size from 375m2 to 737m2. The majority of the residential cell is proposed at a density of R20, with R30 towards the western boundary of the subject land.

·    A road network that provides for connectivity to adjacent land within the Dunsborough Lakes estate and a single centralised access point to Commonage Road.

·    A 20m landscape buffer to Commonage Road.

 

The endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan is provided at Attachment F and the proposed modified overall structure plan is provided at Attachment G.

 

The proposal is supported by the following technical assessments and key findings of each are discussed below under appropriate sub-headings.

 

i.      Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment

ii.     Bushfire Management Plan

iii.    Local Water Management Strategy

 

Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment

 

A Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment undertaken in early spring 2012 identified the ecological values, opportunities and constraints across the subject land. The key findings of the assessment are summarised as follows –

 

Flora & Vegetation

 

·    70 flora species from 27 families were recorded on the site, including 32 introduced species.

·    No threatened (declared rare) or priority listed flora species were recorded during the survey.

·    Six vegetation types were identified broadly representing the Abba vegetation complex of which less than 2% of the pre-European extent remains. Where there is less than 10% of the pre-European extent of a complex remaining, remnants of the vegetation complex are considered to be significant and a priority for conservation. Wetland areas occur in the northern area of the subject land and have been modified with constructed drains and sumps.

·    Jarrah/Marri/WA Peppermint occur across drier areas of the site, with Melaleuca species present in wetland areas. The understorey is dominated by introduced species.

·    The condition of the vegetation over the majority of the subject land was assessed as being degraded to completely degraded, with some areas either in good condition or cleared.

 


 

Fauna

 

·    Eucalyptus (Jarrah/Marri) and WA Peppermint woodland, Melaleuca woodland, artificial ponds and paddock comprise the four fauna habitat types. The majority of fauna habitat was assessed as disturbed or highly degraded, other than the narrow corridor of Eucalyptus and WA Peppermint Tree woodland along Commonage Road which was assessed as being in good condition.

·    40 fauna species were recorded and of those three species are listed as conservation significant (Vulnerable, Endangered or Threatened), being: Baudin’s Black Cockatoo; Carnaby’s Cockatoo; and Western Ringtail Possum.

·    Areas of Black Cockatoo breeding and foraging habitat and Western Ringtail Possum habitat are the primary habitat features of significance within the subject land. These areas include the central vegetation corridor (that links with vegetation on adjoining land), along Commonage Road and a small pocket in the north eastern corner of the subject land.

 

Key recommendations of the assessment are -

 

·    Consider the rehabilitation of appropriate parts of the site for conservation.

·    Retain and manage the vegetation which is in good condition.

·    To minimise impacts on fauna, retain and improve remnant vegetation patches that are in good condition, including corridors, such as through the centre of the site and along Commonage Road.

·    Retain WA Peppermint trees with a diameter of >100mm and large mature Eucalypt trees, especially those surrounded by remnant vegetation.

 

An assessment of the environmental significance of vegetation within the proposed future residential portion of the subject land and the requirement for referral to the Department of Environment and Energy has also been provided in support of the Amendment.

 

The assessment finds that vegetation clearing that would result from the implementation of the residential development area, as shown on the proposed structure plan, is unlikely to have a significant impact on black cockatoo species or the Western Ringtail Possum. This is primarily due to the following factors:

 

·    large areas of reserved potential habitat for all species exist nearby to the subject land;

·    the proposed action will not fragment the existing remnant vegetation corridor within the subject land;

·    the vegetation that will be cleared within the residential development area of the subject land is of poor quality; and

·    the vegetation that will be included in public open space is the best representation of habitat within the subject land.

 

Bushfire Management Plan

 

A portion of the subject land is designated bushfire prone on the State Map of Bushfire Prone Areas. In response, a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) has been prepared in accordance with the WAPC State Planning Policy 3.7 – Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas 2015/Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas 2017.

 


 

The key findings of the BMP are summarised as follows -

 

·    Pre-development vegetation is assessed as: ‘Class A Forest’ in the south and west of the subject land; ‘Class B Woodland’ in the centre, east and northeast areas of the subject land; and ‘Class G Grassland’ in the northern and southern portions of the subject land.

·    Effective slope is assessed as flat ground.

·    The vegetation to be retained post-development in the central public open space and landscape buffer along Commonage Road is not considered to present bushfire threat to future development.

·    The BMP BAL contour map suggests that four residential lots have a marginal intrusion of the BAL-40 contour, however with the proposed internal road network, combined with the building setbacks required by the Residential Planning Codes of WA for R20 and R30, the separation distance between future development (houses) and classified vegetation will achieve BAL-29 or lower. The BAL contour map is provided at Attachment H.

·    The BMP finds that the southern portion of Lot 10 is suitable for residential subdivision and development as set out by the proposed structure plan.

 

Local Water Management Strategy

 

The Local Water Management Strategy (LWMS) for the subject land describes drainage strategies for the management of 1:1, 1:5, 1:10 and 1:100yr stormwater (flood) events using a combined system of on-lot detention, swales, conveyance pipes, bio-retention and detention basins of various sizes. Post-development peak flow rates are estimated to be equal to or less than the estimated pre-development peak flow rates for the 1:5 flood event. The LWMS does not propose off-site treatment/disposal of stormwater.

 

Services

 

The Amendment report states that the future development of Lot 10 can be serviced by extending the reticulated water, sewer, power and telecommunications infrastructure located within the adjacent Dunsborough Lakes estate.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

The key elements of the statutory environment with respect to this proposal are set out in the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. Each is discussed below under appropriate subheadings.

 

Planning and Development Act 2005

 

The Planning and Development Act 2005 outlines the relevant considerations when preparing and amending local planning schemes. The relevant provisions of the Act have been taken into account in preparing and processing this Amendment.

 

Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015

 

The Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, which came into operational effect on 19 October 2015, identifies three different levels of amendments – basic, standard and complex.  The resolution of the local government is to specify the level of the amendment and provide an explanation justifying this choice.  This Amendment is considered to be a ‘standard’ amendment.

 


 

The Regulations provide separate processes for the approval of Scheme amendments and structure plans, adherence to which would advance the proposed Structure Plan ahead of the Amendment. However as the Structure Plan is reliant upon the change in zoning proposed in the Amendment and the nature of the proposal supports their assessment in parallel, the Structure Plan and Amendment are being progressed concurrently. Progression of the proposed Structure Plan will therefore assume the process and timeframes associated with the Amendment.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

The key policies relevant to the proposal are:

 

1.    State Planning Policy 6.1 Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge Policy.

2.    State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning for Bush Fire Prone Areas/Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas 2015.

3.    City of Busselton Draft Local Planning Strategy.

4.    Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan.

 

State Planning Policy 6.1 Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge Policy

 

State Planning Policy 6.1 Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge Policy (LNRSPP) identifies the subject land as a ‘Development Investigation Area’. A Development Investigation Area is a guide to potential development, but requires detailed investigation (structure planning and rezoning) prior to subdivision and development, including form, function and design. In the vicinity of a ‘Principal Centre’ i.e. Dunsborough, a Development Investigation Area may comprise urban development.

 

State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas and Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas

 

SPP 3.7 directs how land use should address bushfire risk management in Western Australia. It applies to all land which has been designated as bushfire prone by the Fire and Emergency Services (FES) Commissioner as highlighted on the Map of Bush Fire Prone Areas. The accompanying Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas provide supporting information to assist in the interpretation of the objectives and policy measures outlined in SPP 3.7, providing advice on how bushfire risk is to be addressed when planning, designing or assessing a planning proposal within a designated bushfire prone area.

 

The key elements of the Guidelines relevant to the proposal are:

 

·   Element 1: Location of Development; and

·   Element 2: Siting of Development.

 

The intent of Element 1 is to ensure that the subdivision, development or land use is located in areas with the least possible risk from bushfire, to help minimise risk to people, property and infrastructure.

 

Element 2 intends to ensure that the siting of development minimises the level of bushfire impact. The fire management plan provided in support of the proposal suggests that bush fire risk to rural residential development can be managed to an acceptable level.

 

The BMP finds that the southern portion of the subject land is suitable for subdivision and development consistent with Element 1 – Performance Principle 1, Acceptable Solution A1.1 and Element 2 - Acceptable Solution A2.1.

 


 

City of Busselton Draft Local Planning Strategy

 

The draft LPS sets the long term broad planning direction for the whole of the District of the City of Busselton and provides the strategic rationale for decisions related to the progressive review and amendment of LPS21.

 

The draft LPS identifies Lot 10 Commonage Road as forming part of Current Urban Growth Area ‘Dunsborough Lakes 12’ and notes that the broader area is already zoned and structure planned for urban development. ‘Dunsborough Lakes 12’ is also identified as a location for a ‘Planned Potential Major Outdoor Recreation Site’.

 

The draft LPS was adopted for final approval by the Council in September 2016 and is currently pending endorsement by the WAPC.

 

Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan

 

The Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan has guided the progressive subdivision and development of land within its boundaries for urban development. Whilst not currently included within the structure plan boundary, the subject land carries the notation: “Potential future urban subject to future scheme amendment”.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no direct financial implications arising from the recommendations of this report.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

Development of this land will support the continued planned growth of Dunsborough, and will ensure continued contributions towards development and upgrading of community facilities to service the Dunsborough Community.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The Officer Recommendation is consistent with community objective 2.1 of the City of Busselton Strategic Community Plan 2017, which is - ‘planning strategies that foster the development of neighbourhoods that meet our needs as we grow’.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the Officer Recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk assessment framework. The assessment identified ‘downside’ risks only, rather than upside risks as well. The implementation of the Officer Recommendation will involve initiating the proposed Amendment for referral to the Environmental Protection Authority and adopting the proposed Structure Plan for advertising. In this regard, there are no significant risks identified.

 

CONSULTATION

 

There is no requirement under the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 to advertise a proposed scheme amendment prior to it being initiated by the Council. Accordingly, no advertising has occurred to date.

 


 

If the Council resolves to initiate the proposed Amendment, the relevant amendment documentation would be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority for consideration of the need for formal assessment under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. Should the EPA resolve that the Amendment does not require formal assessment it will be advertised for 42 days in accordance with the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.

 

The Western Australian Planning Commission has been consulted regarding the submission of a combined scheme amendment request and a structure plan since the new local planning schemes regulations came into effect. The approach to this application will be to process the Structure Plan and Amendment concurrently.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The City’s draft Local Planning Strategy identifies Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough as forming part of the broader Dunsborough Lakes urban growth area.

 

The proposal is consistent with State Planning Policy 6.1 Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge which includes the land within a ‘Development Investigation Area’ for prospective urban development, subject to rezoning and structure planning. The subject land is in proximity to the Dunsborough town centre and its associated commercial and community services and facilities and forms a logical extension to the existing Dunsborough Lakes estate.

 

The proposed structure plan layout over Lot 10 responds to the physical attributes of the site, namely the identification of remnant vegetation and habitat areas occupying the central third and adjacent to Commonage Road. These are seen as warranting environmental preservation and protection, in accordance with the findings of the environmental assessment, with the northern third set aside for the future development of district-level active open space, and the southern third for residential subdivision and development.

 

The proposal would also assist in facilitating the acquisition of a 7.56 hectare portion of Lot 10 by the City for the future development of district-level sporting and active recreation ovals and associated infrastructure.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Officers are recommending that proposed Scheme Amendment 27 to Local Planning Scheme 21 and the proposed Structure Plan be adopted for public consultation, which will include referral to the EPA and subsequent advertising and referral to relevant state government agencies. 

 

OPTIONS

 

Should the Council not support the Officer Recommendation, the Council could instead resolve –

 

1.            To decline the request to initiate the proposed amendment (and provide a reason for such a decision). It should be noted that under the relevant legislation there is no right of appeal against a Council decision not to initiate an amendment.

2.            To seek further information before making a decision.

3.            To initiate the proposed amendment subject to further identified modification(s) as required.

 

Officer assessment has not revealed any substantive issue or reasonable grounds that would support any of these options and it is considered that options 2 and 3 could be more appropriately considered following the receipt of advice from the relevant state government agencies.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The implementation of the Officer Recommendation would include advising the applicant of the Council resolution and referring the Amendment to the Environmental Protection Authority, which will occur within one month of the resolution.

 

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council:

1.    In pursuance of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, initiates Amendment 21 to the City of Busselton Local Planning Scheme 21 for the purposes of:

a.    Rezoning Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough from ‘Reserve for Public Purposes’ to ‘Special Purposes (Dunsborough Lakes Development Area)’.

b.    Amending Schedule 3 – ‘Special Provision Areas’ to include Lot 10 Commonage Road, Dunsborough.

c.     Amending the boundary of Special Provision Area 42.

d.    Amending the Scheme map accordingly.

2.    That, as the draft Amendment is in the opinion of the Council consistent with Part V of the Act and Regulations made pursuant to the Act, that upon preparation of the necessary documentation, the draft Amendment be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) as required by the Act, and on receipt of a response from the EPA indicating that the draft Amendment is to be subject to formal environmental assessment, be advertised for a period of 42 days, in accordance with the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. In the event that the EPA determines that the draft Amendment is to be subject to formal environmental assessment, this assessment is to be prepared by the proponent prior to advertising of the draft Amendment.

3.    Advises the Western Australian Planning Commission that the proposed Amendment is considered a ‘standard’ amendment pursuant to the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015 for the following reasons:

i.      The amendment would have minimal impact on land in the Scheme area that is not the subject of the amendment.

ii.     The amendment would not result in any significant environmental, social, economic or governance impacts on land in the Scheme area.

4.    Adopts the draft Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan depicted at Attachment E for public consultation, pursuant to the deemed provisions of Part 7 of the City of Busselton Local Planning Scheme 21.

 

 


Council

85

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment a

Location Plan

 


Council

86

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment b

District Open Space Concept Plan

 


Council

87

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment c

Existing Zoning

 


Council

88

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment d

Proposed Zoning

 


Council

89

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment e

Proposed Structure Plan Extract

 


Council

90

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment f

Endorsed Dunsborough Lakes Structure Plan

 


Council

91

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment g

Proposed Overall Structure Plan

 


Council

92

13 September 2017

11.1

Attachment h

BAL Contour Map

 


Council                                                                                      100                                                      13 September 2017

11.2           APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR AN EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY (LIMESTONE) AND CRUSHING FACILITY AT LOT 3 (130) & LOT 237 LUNDLOW PARK ROAD WONNERUP

SUBJECT INDEX:

Development/Planning Applications

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Development is managed sustainably and our environment valued.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Development Services and Policy

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Statutory Planning

REPORTING OFFICER:

Statutory Planning Coordinator - Joanna Wilson

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Planning and Development Services - Paul Needham

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Aerial

Attachment b    Original Development Proposal

Attachment c    Amended Development Plan

Attachment d   Summary of Submissions

Attachment e    Agency Submissions

Attachment f    Soil Mapping

Attachment g   HA Report May-17

Attachment h   28 June 2017 Report

Attachment i     Haul Routes

Attachment j     Conditions Fire Access Track - Option 1

Attachment k    Conditions Ludlow Park Road - Option 2  

  

PRÉCIS

 

Councillors will recall that this application was deferred from the Council meeting of 28 June 2017, pending further investigation on the availability of Theresa Road, as an alternative access to Ludlow Park Road, for the heavy vehicles associated with the proposed extractive industry.  This is discussed in detail in the Officer Comment section of the report.

 

Since this time, a further site visit has been undertaken by officers in light of concerns raised by community members about ground water issues. 

 

The report from the 28 June meeting is attached as Attachment H, the reports need to be understood together.  The content of this report has additional information or changes/updates to the 28 June report.  The following outlines the updates within the report:

 

·    a response from the applicant in regard to the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attraction’s (DBCA, formerly DPaW) submission;

·    corrections to Local Rural Planning Strategy related information;

·    Further discussion regarding separation distance to the Vasse-Wonnerup Ramsar Wetland System; 

·    Update relating to Federal Department of Environment referral;

·    Information updating compliance investigations by the City; and

·    Revised officer recommendation and option.

 

As a result of the outcomes of the site visit and further consideration of groundwater issues, it is considered that the proposal is inconsistent with the relevant planning framework and is recommended for refusal. This is set out in more detail in the body of the report.

 


 

BACKGROUND

 

Consideration of this application was deferred at the Council meeting of 28 June 2017, pending further investigation on the availability of Theresa Road, as an alternative access to Ludlow Park Road, for the heavy vehicles associated with the proposed extractive industry.   DBCA have advised that the use of Theresa Road would not be supported (note that ‘Theresa Road’ is not actually constructed); however there is a fire-access track immediately adjacent to Theresa Road.  In order to utilise DBCA’s fire-access track, they have advised that an agreement with DBCA would need to be entered and the City would be required to commence the process of the de-gazettal of Theresa Road, and amalgamation of that land into the adjoining Tuart Forest National Park. 

 

Since the deferral of the application, officers have been on site again after numerous complaints from adjoining landowners.  It was noted on site that it appeared that extraction of limestone has already been carried out without approval and numerous breaches of the current development approvals for extraction of sand from the site appear to have taken place, in particular, it appears that ground water has been intercepted. 

 

In light of the groundwater concerns, officers have concerns about the hydrological assessment that was submitted and the ability to extract limestone above the groundwater level. 

 

For further background, please refer to the 28 June 2017 report.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

Refer to 28 June 2017 report.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

Refer to 28 June 2017 report, other than with report to the following.

 

Local Rural Planning Strategy

 

Under the Local Rural Planning Strategy the site is located within the ‘rural wetlands’ precinct. Within this precinct an Environmental objective is to provide for extraction of mineral sand only where impact can be managed and sustainable rehabilitation can be achieved.  It is noted that the site is currently used for dairy cattle and horticulture.   As horticulture is an intensive user of fertilisers, the drain water is likely to be high in nutrients, especially Nitrogen.  In light of the limited information submitted, it is considered that the proposal would pose an unacceptable risk to the wetlands.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no significant financial implications to the City arising from the staff recommendation in this report.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

There are no significant long-term financial plan implications.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

Refer to 28 June 2017 report.

 


 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential implications of implementing the Officer Recommendation has been undertaken using the City’s risk assessment framework. The assessment identifies ‘downside’ risks only, rather than ‘upside’ risks as well. Risks are only identified where the individual risk, once controls are identified, is medium or greater. No such risk has been identified.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Refer to 28 June 2017 report.

 

The comments from DBCA with regard to the haul route are provided at Attachment E.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The City has assessed the application having regard to the objectives and policies of the “Agriculture”

Zone and Clause 11.2 - Matters to be Considered of the Scheme (clause 67 of Part 8 of the regulations).  Officers have also had regard to the requirements as set out in Local Planning Policy 5A - Extractive Industry.  Key considerations are outlined and discussed below.

 

Proximity to Vasse-Wonnerup Ramsar Wetland System

 

Officers are of the opinion that the pivot irrigation system is not an appropriate reason to reduce the separation distance.  The separation distance to the Ramsar Wetland System is recommended by the Department of Environment and Energy to ensure that there will not be an impact on the wetland.  In order to reduce the distance, assessments should be undertaken to ensure there is sufficient depth to the water table to ensure that the quality of water is not compromised and drainage can be managed appropriately.  Based on the outcome of the site visit and that it appeared that groundwater has been intercepted and already compromised, officers are of the opinion that the separation distance should not be reduced until it can be shown through a revised hydrological assessment that the water quality can be managed during and post extraction.  Officers have concerns that reducing the buffer distance would have a detrimental impact on the Ramsar wetland and would be contrary to relevant matters to be considered.

 

Ground Water

 

Concerns have been raised that Department of Water have been inconsistent in their approach to separation distance to groundwater across the South-West.  Officers have discussed this with DWER who have advised that the minimum separation to groundwater is generally 300mm, but the minimum separation in a public drinking water supply area is 2m.  Some local governments across the South-West have imposed within their local planning policies a minimum separation of 2m to groundwater.   

 

The extraction in Myalup that some in the community have referred to is public land that Department of Mines and Petroleum have been inviting expressions of interest (EOI) for.  Within the EOI they were informing contractors that they required a minimum 2m separation to groundwater. 

 


 

DWER have been made aware of the outcomes of the site visit and provided the following comments:

 

“With regards to the groundwater issue, without in-situ water table monitoring over time, from suitably constructed monitoring bores with known screen depths and stratigraphy, it is not possible to establish conclusively maximum seasonal groundwater levels (MSGL) at the site of the proposed extraction operations.

 

Therefore DWER’s advice that extractive activities should not occur below 300mm of the estimated MSGL is subject to a crucial factor that remains unknown.

 

If the MSGL was determined with surety, it would be possible for the City to set a maximum pit depth, rather than proposing to maintain a minimum vertical separation between the MSGL and the pit depth, with all the uncertainty that the latter implies.

 

Put simply, in the absence of surveyed pit floor levels, correlated with relevant groundwater level monitoring data, in this location the risk of intercepting groundwater is high.

 

DWER’s response to this proposal has been consistent, in that it does not wish to see extractive industry occur below the MSGL with a minimum separation distance being maintained at 300mm.

 

In this extent, on 8th June 2017 DWER (formerly DoW) recommended to the City of Busselton that given the implied uncertainty of the MSGL, any condition for approval should include:

 

“If any interception of groundwater occurs at any time during the extractive industry operation, work shall cease immediately and an advice notice provided to the City of Busselton within 48 hours, followed by agreed remedial action and if necessary, a review of operational integrity”.

 

This in essence was a safeguard to prevent quarrying below an MSGL that is unknown.

 

To summarise the situation, with the lack of certainty about the MSGL, a precautionary approach must be taken to assessing the veracity of the proposal.

 

If the City of Busselton has any doubt about the capacity for this proposal to proceed conditionally, i.e. no quarrying below the MSGL, in the absence of key information backed by credible data, it would be well advised to err on the side of caution”.

 

Haulage Route

 

The DBCA have provided comments in respect of the request from Councillors to consider the use of Theresa Road as an alternative access route.  DBCA have advised:

 


 

Preferred Haulage Option

Legal access to Lots 3 and 237 via Ludlow Park Road, is the proponent's proposed access route for heavy truck movements from the extraction site.   In addition the original proposal indicated that there would be approximately nine truck movements per day from (NB: 18 vehicle movements per day) the proposed extraction site.

 

The BSO Development Consultant's letter dated 20 January 2017 (BS017) to the CoB indicated that the proponent would be willing to transport from the extraction site on pre-determined days and suggested Monday Tuesday and Wednesday in any week, with some smaller contracts supplied on Thursday and Fridays.

 

Given this, the proposed maximum use of Ludlow Park Road for the extractive haulage generally only coincides with Forest Adventures South West operating times on one day of the week (Mondays) and occasionally on Tuesdays and Wednesdays for large group bookings, outside of the school holiday period.

 

The use of this access minimizes potential impacts to the Ramsar wetland system, State forest and National Park and is DBCA's preferred haulage access route from the proposed extractive industry site and all heavy truck movements from the Lots.

 

It is suggested that truck movements for Mondays and occasionally on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, could be managed with suitable signage, a formed crosswalk, pedestrian track and fencing to ensure high ropes patrons cross the road at a designated point and even a crosswalk attendant if deemed necessary.

 

Potential dust impacts from haulage trucks could be managed with the sealing of the section of Ludlow Park Road where it passes alongside the high ropes course. DBCA would not object to the sealing of the road to reduce potential dust impacts to the Forest Adventures South West High Ropes Course.

 

Alternative Haulage Option

 

It is noted that Theresa Road is not formally constructed and retains native vegetation along its entire northern extent. The existing track adjacent to the southern portion of Theresa Road between Tuart Drive and the southern corner of Lot 101 is a DBCA-managed fire access track.  The fire access track, within and adjacent to Theresa Road is a well-constructed track

 

Under this scenario DBCA would prefer that Theresa Road is not constructed for the proposed extractive industry haulage route. Rather, that the existing DBCA fire access track from Tuart Drive to Lot 237 be upgraded and used as the proposed haulage route for the proposed extractive industry. The use of the existing constructed fire access track would not require any additional clearing of native vegetation.

 

If DBCA's preferred haulage route along Ludlow Park Road cannot be accommodated, and the CoB agree to progress the closure and degazettal of Theresa Road, with vesting of Theresa Road to DBCA, and approves the use of the fire access track for extractive haulage, then the proponent would need to formally seek permission from DBCA for the use of the fire access track, when CoB have approved the proposed extractive industry.

 

In order for DBCA’s fire-access track to be utilised, an agreement with the DBCA would need to be entered into before a development application is approved and the City would be required to commence the process of the de-gazettal of Theresa Road.  Note that conditions of approval that require approval of a third party or approval under separate legislation cannot be valid planning conditions.  As such, a condition requiring the applicant to enter into an agreement with DBCA and/or a road closure would not be a valid condition.

 

It is noted that the current operations have experienced periods of peak demand which has resulted in additional vehicle movements above those that were advised as part of the application. The applicant has indicated that negotiations over a large contract has not come to fruition at the time of writing this report and has suggested that condition limiting 10 truck loads per day would be adequate for any future contracts (i.e. 20 vehicle movements per day).  .  

 

The applicant has also agreed that vehicles would not exit the site during the weekend and if the high rope business has a large volume of children (i.e buses of school children) arriving on a particular day then they would not operate on that day. 

 

Based on the proposed vehicle numbers, the applicant does not want to utilise DBCA fire access track for haulage. 

 

Dust and Noise Management

 

Refer to 28 June 2017 report.

 

Referral to Federal Department

 

The Compliance Branch of the Federal Environment Department has contacted the City requesting information on the proposal, in particular when the application will be determined by Council.  It is now the role of the Compliance Branch to undertake an investigation by making further enquiries and work with the proponent to resolve any matters.  

 

Compliance Investigation by the City

 

City officers have conducted a number of site visits as a result of complaints received from the community that breaches of the conditions of the current development application have taken place.  As a result of the latest site visit, it was noted several conditions appear to have been breached and further development may have been undertaken without approval.  Once this application has been determined, officers envisage undertaking more detailed investigations.

 

CONCLUSION

 

It was observed on site from an existing excavation that the height of the limestone sheet appeared to be very close to the groundwater level, in light of this observation it questions the validity of the hydrological assessment and the projections of the amount of limestone that can be extracted.  On this basis, officers consider that the proposed extractive could not be undertaken without intercepting the groundwater table and there is not considered to be an economic resource above the groundwater table.  In the absence of clear and credible information indicating the level to which extraction can occur, it is not considered that approval can be contemplated.

 


 

It is considered highly unlikely that post extraction the finished pit floor is going to be inundated in winter. The land, after the pit is finished, has to be suitable for the included post-extraction use i.e. horticulture. To make the land suitable for horticulture it would need to be drained to the wetlands.  As horticulture is an intensive user of fertilisers, any run-off is likely to be high in nutrients, especially nitrogen.  As a result, it is considered that the proposal could pose an unacceptable risk to the wetlands.

 

Officers consider that the proposal is unacceptable and is contrary to Local Planning Scheme No.21 and should be refused. 

 

OPTIONS

 

Should the Council be of the view that the groundwater and wetland issues are adequately addressed, options available to the Council would include the following -

 

1.   Approve the proposal with the use of DBCA’s Fire-access track as the haul route and subject to the revocation of the Approval granted for the extraction of sand on the 29 October 2014 and attached conditions (Attachment J), once the applicant has entered into an agreement with DBCA for the use of the access track and the City commences the de-gazettal of Theresa Road and amalgamation of that land into the adjoining Tuart Forest National Park. 

 

2.   Approve the proposal with the use of Ludlow Park Road as the haul route and subject to the revocation of the Approval granted for the extraction of sand on the 29 October 2014 and attached conditions (Attachment K).

 

If Council are minded to approve the development application, the use of DBCA’s fire-access track would be the preferred option.  It is considered by officers that this would be the safest haul route, and that it would remove any potential conflict with the high ropes course and neighbouring residents.  Furthermore it would result in the vehicles exiting directly onto Tuart Drive, which has a much more significant capacity to accommodate heavy vehicle traffic.  It would also negate the need to enforce limits on vehicle movements, and provide greater potential and flexibility of supply from the operation.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

The proponent will be advised of the Council decision within two weeks of the Council meeting. 

 

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council resolve to refuse the development application (as submitted) for Extractive Industry (Limestone) and Crushing Facility at Lot 3 (130) and Lot 237 Ludlow Park Road, Wonnerup because it is inconsistent with Local Planning Scheme No. 21 for the following reasons –

 

1.     The proposal would intercept with groundwater to the detriment on the natural environment and water resources.

 

2.     The post extraction change in ground level would result in the site being inundated in winter, exposure of groundwater to pollutants and hydrological dysfunction.  As a result, it is considered that the proposal would pose an unacceptable risk to the wetlands.

 

3.     The haulage route would not be adequate for the number of vehicle movements associated with the development to the detriment of the safety of the users of the surrounding road network.

 

4.     Clause 67 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2015 Deemed Provisions lists matters that local government is to have due regard to when considering a development application. The following are considered to be of relevance to the subject proposal:

(a)     The aims and provisions of the Scheme and any other local planning Scheme operating within the Scheme Area

(g)       Any local planning policy for the Scheme area

(n)       The amenity of the locality including the following –

(i) environmental impacts of the development

(o)       The likely effect of the development on the natural environment or water resources and any means that are proposed to protect or to mitigate impacts on the natural environment or the water resource

(q)       The suitability of the land for the development taking into account the possible risk of flooding, tidal inundation, subsidence, landslip, bush fire, soil erosion, land degradation or any other risk

(za)     The comments or submissions received from any authority consulted under clause 66

 

Approval of the proposal would be in conflict with provisions (a), (g), (n), (o), (q) and (za) listed under Clause 67 of the Regulations.  

 

5.     As a result of the above the proposal is inconsistent with Local Planning Scheme 21 Clause 4.2.6 objectives of the Agriculture zone:

 

(a)       To conserve the productive potential of rural land

(d)       To enable the development of land for other purposed where it can be demonstrated by   the  applicant that suitable land or buildings for the proposed purposes are not available elsewhere and that such purposes will not detrimentally affect the amenity of any existing
or proposed nearby development

 

6.     Approval of this development would be inconsistent with the orderly and proper planning of the locality for the reasons noted above.

 


Council

101

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment a

Aerial

 


Council

102

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment b

Original Development Proposal

 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

113

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment c

Amended Development Plan

 


Council

120

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment d

Summary of Submissions

 

 

No.

 

NAME & ADDRESS

NATURE OF SUBMISSION

OFFICER COMMENT

Agency Submissions

1.    

Water Corporation

No objection

Noted.

2.    

Main Roads

No objection

Noted.

3.    

Department of Water – Now Department of Water, Environment and Regulation (DWER)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised DWER’s comments

Following a review of the Hydrological Assessment provided by the applicant on 31 May 2017 the following conditions are recommended:

 

a. Groundwater levels and quality are to be monitored monthly, and reported to the City of Busselton at the end of each winter, in accordance with Section 6.1 of the Hydrogeological Assessment (Water Direct Pty Ltd, 2017).

 

 

 

b.  Extractive activities should not occur below beyond 300 mm of the maximum seasonal groundwater level, estimated to be 0.1m to 0.3m AHD from the western to the eastern side of the site.

 

c.  If any interception of groundwater occurs at any time during the extractive industry operation, work shall cease immediately and an advice notice provided to the City of Busselton within 48 hours, followed by agreed remedial action and if necessary, a review of operational integrity.

 

d.  No hydrocarbons (fuels, oils, lubricants etc) shall be stored within the pit area.  All refuelling and maintenance must be carried outside of the pit area in bunded areas.

 

e.   The pit to be rehabilitated with clean free draining fill overlain by topsoil to create a minimum separation to the MSGL (as proven by on-site monitoring during the operation of the pit) of 1.0m.

 

DoW strongly supports the CoB’s intent to condition any licence approval upon the provision of a ‘Staging Plan’ for the EI, whereby no more than 2 hectares is actively quarried at any one time.

 

This proposal by virtue of its proximity to a RAMSAR wetland (Vasse Wonnerup) and the Tuart Forest National Park, carries risks that need to be cautiously addressed.

 

 

 

DWER’s advice that extractive activities should not occur below 300mm of the estimated MSGL is subject to a crucial factor that remains unknown.

 

If the MSGL was determined with surety, it would be possible for the City to set a maximum pit depth, rather than proposing to maintain a minimum vertical separation between the MSGL and the pit depth, with all the uncertainty that the latter implies.

 

Put simply, in the absence of surveyed pit floor levels, correlated with relevant groundwater level monitoring data, in this location the risk of intercepting groundwater is high.

 

In this extent, on 8th June 2017 DWER (formerly DoW) recommended to the City of Busselton that given the implied uncertainty of the MSGL, any condition for approval should include:

 

·         “If any interception of groundwater occurs at any time during the extractive industry operation, work shall cease immediately and an advice notice provided to the City of Busselton within 48 hours, followed by agreed remedial action and if necessary, a review of operational integrity”.

 

This in essence was a safeguard to prevent quarrying below an MSGL that is unknown.

 

To summarise the situation, with the lack of certainty about the MSGL, a precautionary approach must be taken to assessing the veracity of the proposal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The City has recommended refusal based on concerns that the groundwater will be intercepted.  Further information is required indicating the level to which extraction can occur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The applicant has been advised referral to Department of the Environment and Energy under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 is recommended due to the proximity of the extractive activities to the RAMSAR wetlands.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The City has recommended refusal based on concerns that the groundwater will be intercepted.  Further information is required indicating the level to which extraction can occur.

 

 

4.    

Department of Parks and Wildlife

Any development should aim to avoid impacts to the Ramsar Wetland, Threatened Ecological Community (TEC), poorly reserved native vegetation, potential threatened flora, the proposed Nature Reserve and National Park, minimise distubrancce to Black Swan nesting sites and retain Western Ringtail Possum, black cockatoo and waterbird habitat trees.

 

The proponent has advised that extractive to take place up with 1m in depth. This is likely to result in a depth of -0.25 to 0.5 AHD. These depths would likely be below average maximum ground water levels and therefore would be unacceptable. Detailed hydrological investigations to demonstrate that the proposal will not impact groundwater or the adjacent Ramsar wetland and TEC are to be provided.

 

Sand berms can be important for hydrology and water quality of wetlands as even shallow lenses of sand provided a freshwater capture and seepage function which supports the wetland’s ecosystem. Proponent to ensure no extractive occurs below 0.5m above the average maximum ground water level and the applicant to provided details of post extraction rehabilitation to ensure no long-term impact on wetland system. 

 

DPAW recommends this proposal is referred to Department of the Environment and Energy under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It is the responsibility of the proponent to refer the application.

 

Bamford 1995 found that adjacent activities can disturb inactive (ie nesting) Black Swan at a distance of approximately 200m. To minimise potential disturbance to nesting Black Swan sites a minimum buffer of 300m between the proposed disturbance area of water bird nest sites is suggested. 

 

Vegetation on site to be retained on sites as it contacts potential WRP, black cockatoo and waterbird habitat.

 

Proposed limestone crusher to be relocated to avoid disturbance to threatened fauna and waterbirds, the compaction of tree roots and lime dust coverage to foliage.

 

Impact on nesting water birds, including Black Swan, have been addressed in the report.

 

 

 

 

 

The City has recommended refusal based on concerns that the groundwater will be intercepted.  Further information is required indicating the level to which extraction can occur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicant has been advised that DPAW recommends referral to Department of the Environment and Energy under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicant has advised that no clearing is to take place.

 

 

Crusher has been located furthest from surrounding residents to minimise visual and audible impacts on surrounding neighbours properties.

5.    

Department of Aboriginal Affairs

No known Aboriginal Heritage sites within Lot 237.

 

Community Submissions

1.    

Alasdair and Rhonda Jackson

Lot 345 Forrest Beach Rd

 

Objection

·      Concerns regarding spill over of contaminated water into wetlands.

·      Potential acid sulphate soils

·      Proximity to swan breeding ground

·      Concerns regarding noise impact on local residential across the lake.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on impact on wetlands and swan breeding ground.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on proximity to ground water.

2.    

Roy And Suellen Payne

426 Forrest Beach Road Wonnerup

 

Objection

·      Concerns regarding noise

·      Can hear current operations on site from their property across the wetlands

·      Concerns regarding water taken and proximity of water table to the surface.

 

 

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on proximity to ground water.

3.    

Jamie Sullivan

434 Forrest Beach Road Wonnerup

Objection

·      Concerns regarding proximity to Wonnerup Conservation Area and Estuary wetlands. Full environmental assessment should be undertaken  due to proximity to environmentally sensitive areas.

·      Considered to be significant impact people who living within the area, wider community as well as on birds and wild life.

·      Concerns regarding timeframe and potential of extension after 5 years.

·      Concerns regarding dust, noise and visual impact. There are minimal trees to hide provide visual screening on the proposed area.

·      No details on cultural or heritage impact surveys have been completed.

·      Concerns regarding noise and vibrations.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on impact on wetlands and swan breeding ground.

 

Concerns about noise and dust have been noted.

 

4.    

Guy Kerrell-Vaughan

 

Objection

·      Concerns regarding potential impact on the Ramsar wetlands

·      Concerns regarding ground water being intercepted

·      Removing the material to lower than the current natural surface will, in this area particularly, lead to greater waterlogging, insect breeding & hydrological dysfunction.

·      Concerns regarding acid sulphate soils

·      Concerns regarding further removal of vegetation and impact on hydrological function of the wetlands

·      Concerns regarding noise and environmental degradation

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on impact on wetlands and ground water.

 

Concerns about noise and dust have been noted.

 

5.    

Michael Brown

Operator of Forest Adventures South West Pty Ltd

Objection

·      Forest Adventures South West Pty Ltd has secured a 21-year lease with the Department of Parks and Wildlife for approximately 9 Ha of land. Ludlow park road which the proponent indicates is essentially a private road bisects our leased area, with activities on one side and car and bus parking on the other.

·     Concerns regarding potential contamination of wetlands

·     Concerns regarding impact of development on amenity of surrounding properties and tourism activities.

·     Concerns regarding trucks resulting in dust along Ludlow Park Road and impact upon their business

·     Concerns regarding truck movements and pedestrian and vehicle safety. Patrons of the business will be required to cross the road from the car park to the high-rope activities.

·     No details on water or pollution management has been provided.

·     Concerns regarding vehicle movement figures provided in application being inaccurate.

·     Concerns regarding state of existing road.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on impact on wetlands.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on haulage route.

 

 

 

 

The City has recommended refusal based on concerns that the groundwater will be intercepted.  Further information is required indicating the level to which extraction can occur.

 

 

6.    

Eden Gardiner

Address not provided

Objection

·      Concerns regarding impacts on wetlands, RASMAR, Tuart Nation park.

 

 

 

 

·      Concerns regarding haulage route and impact on other users of the roads within the area.

 

·      Concerns regarding impact on nearby residential properties, including heritage properties, short stay accommodation premises and other tourist activities within the area.

 

·      Concerns regarding compliance with parameters indicated within proposal.

 

 

 

·      Concerns regarding traffic and figures provided being incorrect.

 

The applicant has been advised referral to Department of the Environment and Energy under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 is recommended due to the proximity of the extractive activities to the RAMSAR wetlands.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on haulage route.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on dust and noise management. 

 

 

 

Should the applicant fail to comply with conditions the City may take compliance action.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on haulage route.

 

7.    

Albert Tassone

512 Forrest Beach Rd

Wonnerup 6271

Objection

·      Concerns regarding impacts on surrounding properties in terms of noise, dust and visual amenity.

·      Concerns regarding impacts on nearby tourist attractions.

 

·      Not consistent with City of Busselton Wetlands Conservation Strategy & Local Planning Policy.

 

 

 

·      Significant environmental considerations due to the RAMSAR Wonnerup Estuary.

 

 

 

·      Currently experience dust from the current operations on the site.

·      Concerns regarding impact on swan breeding areas.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on dust and noise management. 

 

 

The City has recommended refusal based on concerns that the groundwater will be intercepted.  Further information is required indicating the level to which extraction can occur.

 

Refer to Officer comment section of report for further discussion on the proximity to Vasse-Wonnerup Ramsar Wetland System

 

 


Council

129

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment e

Agency Submissions

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 


 


 


 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

168

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment f

Soil Mapping

 


 


Council

188

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment g

HA Report May-17

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 



Council

201

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment h

28 June 2017 Report

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

202

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment i

Haul Routes

 




Council

208

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment j

Conditions Fire Access Track - Option 1

 

FIRE-ACCESS TRACK

That the Council resolve:

 

That application DA16/0699 submitted for Extractive Industry (Limestone) and Crushing Facility at Lot 3 (130) and Lot 237 Ludlow Park Road, Wonnerup, is considered by the Council to be consistent with Local Planning Scheme No. 21 and the objectives and policies of the zone within which it is located.

 

Once the applicant has entered into a lease agreement with DBCA for the use of the access track and the City commences the de-gazettal of Theresa Road and amalgamation of that land into the adjoining Tuart Forest National Park.  That Development Approval is issued for the proposal referred to above subject to the revocation of the Approval granted for the extraction of sand on the 29 October 2014 and the following conditions:

General Conditions

1.         The development hereby approved is permitted to operate for five years from the date of this Decision Notice or until 500,000 cubic metres volume of material or in accordance with condition 5.8, whichever is the lesser.  The site shall be rehabilitated in accordance with an approved Rehabilitation Plan by the expiry date of this development approval.

 

2.         The development hereby approved shall be undertaken in accordance with the signed and stamped, Approved Development Plans and Approved Management Plans and except as may be modified by the following conditions.

 

Prior to Commencement of Any Works Conditions:

 

3.         The development hereby approved, or any works required to implement the development, shall not commence until the owner/applicant has applied for, and obtained, a Permit to Commence certificate from the City.  The following plans/details are to be submitted to and approved by the City prior to requesting the issue of a Permit to Commence:

 

3.1       Details of the upgrading of the fire access track.  The fire access track shall be constructed 4m wide using limestone.  Every 200m, a 7m wide by 20m long overtaking bay shall be constructed using limestone formation.

 

3.2       Staging plan dividing the approved extractive area into 2 hectare cells and indicating the timeframe each individual cell is to be extracted and rehabilitated;

 

3.3       A Noise Management Plan submitted to the City.

 

3.4       Details of road signage to be erected along Tuart Drive.  The installation of the signs shall completed by the City of Busselton for which fees are payable. Signage shall include signs on both approaches to the pit along Tuart Drive 100m from the access.

 

3.5       Details of the sealing of the crossover.  The crossover to be sealed and drained 20m in           length from the edge of Tuart Drive seal.  Crossover to be sealed 7m wide with splays               of 5m x 5m where it meets Tuart Drive

 

3.6       A revised Hydrological assessment that includes, but not limited, in-situ water table monitoring over time, from suitably constructed monitoring bores with known screen depths and stratigraphy, to establish conclusively maximum seasonal groundwater levels (MSGL) at the site of the proposed extraction operations.

 

4.         The development hereby approved, or any works required to implement the development, are subject to the following bonds (accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner) which shall be paid to the City within 2 months of the date of this development approval:

 

4.1       A dust bond to the value of $5,000.00 which shall be held against satisfactory compliance with Condition 5.11 of this approval.

 

4.2       A rehabilitation bond to the value of $20,000.00 which shall be held against satisfactory compliance with Condition 5.9 of this approval.

 

4.3       A road maintenance bond of $30,000.00 in the form of an unconditional bank guarantee to ensure that the surrounding road network is maintained to the satisfaction of the City for the term of the extractive industry.  Those portions of public roads affected by the activities related to the approval shall be maintained to a standard acceptable to the City at cost to the applicant; such bond may be utilised for road maintenance purposes where necessary as a result of the operation. The bond shall be accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner.

 

4.4       Further to conditions 4.1 - 4.3, the bonds are to be accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner. The legal agreement shall include:

 

(i)        The ability for the City to be able to use the bond, or part of the bond as appropriate, and any costs to the City including administrative costs of completing or rectifying any outstanding works on site in accordance with  the conditions of this development approval and any further costs.

 

(ii)       Written authorisation from the owner of the land that the City may enter the site at any time and permit the City to complete or rectify any outstanding work to the satisfaction of the City.

 

On-Going Conditions:

5.         The works undertaken to satisfy Conditions 1 - 4 (inclusive) shall be subsequently maintained for the life of the development including, and in addition to, the following conditions:

 

5.1       The development hereby approved shall be limited to: the extraction of limestone from the site; screening of material; crushing; associated drainage works; and rehabilitation works. 

5.2       Notwithstanding Condition 5.1 above, working hours within the pit area, including crushing and transportation of materials shall be restricted to the hours between: 7.00am and 5.00pm Mondays to Fridays; 7.00am and 1.00pm Saturdays for rehabilitation works only; and at no time on Sundays or public holidays.

5.3       The designated haulage route is to be either north or south                 along Tuart Drive until the road meets Bussell Hwy. From these locations, the            trucks are free to travel in either direction along Bussell Hwy.

5.4       Trucks are not to operate on Monday to Friday between the hours of 7.30am and 9.00am and between 3.00pm and 4.30pm on any given school day on a school bus route (Ludlow Road North and Tuart Drive), or between other times as agreed in writing between the applicant and the local government.

5.5       A maximum number of 100 truck movements (i.e. 50 trucks entering and 50 trucks exiting the site) shall be permitted on the operating days and times as permitted per Condition 5.2 and 5.4 above. 

5.6       Further to condition 5.5 above, should more than 100 truck movements per day be proposed in any 24 hour period a Traffic Management Plan is to be submitted to, and approved by the City, at least 7 working days prior.

5.7       No more than 2 hectares shall be worked at any one time; this area shall then be rehabilitated in accordance with the approved details pursuant to Condition 3.2 concurrently with the extraction of the following 2 hectare area.

5.8       The lowest level of excavation shall always be a minimum of at least 300mm above the maximum water table level and no dewatering works are to be undertaken. The City is to be notified within 24 hours if the water table is intercepted.

5.9       Further to condition 5.8, the final land surface (after rehabilitation for horticulture) shall be 1 metre above the maximum seasonal groundwater level. The pit is to be rehabilitated with clean free draining fill overlain by topsoil.

5.10    The following minimum setback from extractive activities shall be achieved at all times:

>   20 metres to the south-eastern and south-western lot boundaries;

5.11    The approved Dust Management Plan shall be implemented and carried out in accordance with the approval details.

5.12    The Noise Management Plan required to satisfy condition 3.3 above shall be implemented and carried out in accordance with the approval details.

5.13    Extractive within 300m of Quindalup Coast land system soils as depicted in the mapping from the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia’s Land Resources Series, report No 5 titled “Busselton, Margaret River, Augusta Land Capability Study” and Figure 6 - Land Systems and Soil Types from Busselton Wetlands shall not occur during Black Swan nesting peak times and shall only occur during Summer and Autumn (1 December through until 31 May).

5.14    No hydrocarbons (fuels, oils, lubricants etc) shall be stored within the pit area.  All refuelling and maintenance must be carried outside of the pit area in bunded areas.

5.15    No vegetation is to be removed as part of the extractive activities hereby approved without first obtaining approval from the City. 

5.16    No dewatering of the extraction area shall be permitted without prior approval from the City and Department of Water.

5.17    The applicant must submit to the City, annually and within 3 (three) months of the anniversary of this approval a report detailing the following:

a)     Survey conducted by a licensed surveyor certifying;

-  The extent/size and location of the area which has been extracted;

-  The extent/size and location of the areas which has been rehabilitated;

-  The extent/size and location of the area which is currently under operation;

b)     Details as to which conditions of this development approval have been complied with and how this has been achieved; and

c)      Details as to which conditions of this development approval have not been complied with and the reasons for such non-compliance (“Compliance Report”).

5.18    In addition to the above, prior to the applicant commencing construction on a new cell a report is to be submitted to the City detailing the following:

a)  Finished ground level in AHD of the cell post extractive activities (Refer to condition 5.8);

b)  Finished ground level in AHD of the cell post rehabilitation (Refer to condition 5.9).

 


Council

211

13 September 2017

11.2

Attachment k

Conditions Ludlow Park Road - Option 2

 

LUDLOW PARK ROAD

That the Council resolve:

 

That application DA16/0699 submitted for Extractive Industry (Limestone) and Crushing Facility at Lot 3 (130) and Lot 237 Ludlow Park Road, Wonnerup, is considered by the Council to be consistent with Local Planning Scheme No. 21 and the objectives and policies of the zone within which it is located.

 

That Development Approval is issued for the proposal referred to above subject to the revocation of the Approval granted for the extraction of sand on the 29 October 2014 and the following conditions:

General Conditions

1.         The development hereby approved is permitted to operate for five years from the date of                 this Decision Notice or until 220,000 cubic metres with a maximum 44,000 cubic metres per        annum volume of material has been extracted.  The site shall be rehabilitated in accordance with an approved Rehabilitation Plan by the expiry date of this development approval.

 

2.         The development hereby approved shall be undertaken in accordance with the signed and stamped, Approved Development Plans and Approved Management Plans and except as may be modified by the following conditions.

 

Prior to Commencement of Any Works Conditions:

 

3.         The development hereby approved, or any works required to implement the development, shall not commence until the owner/applicant has applied for, and obtained, a Permit to Commence certificate from the City.  The following plans/details are to be submitted to and approved by the City prior to requesting the issue of a Permit to Commence:

 

3.1       The northern fork of Ludlow Park Road, indicated in red on the approval plans, to be upgraded for 27 metres as measured from its intersection with Ludlow Road North;

3.2       Staging plan dividing the approved extractive area into 2 hectare cells and indicating the timeframe each individual cell is to be extracted and rehabilitated;

3.3       A Noise Management Plan submitted to the City.

3.4       A revised Hydrological assessment that includes, but not limited to, in-situ water table monitoring over time, from suitably constructed monitoring bores with known screen depths and stratigraphy, to establish conclusively maximum seasonal groundwater levels (MSGL) at the site of the proposed extraction operations.

 

4.         The development hereby approved, or any works required to implement the development, are subject to the following bonds (accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner) which shall be paid to the City within 2 months of the date of this development approval:

 

4.1       A dust bond to the value of $5,000.00 which shall be held against satisfactory compliance with Condition 5.11 of this approval.

4.2       A rehabilitation bond to the value of $20,000.00 which shall be held against satisfactory compliance with Condition 5.9 of this approval.

4.3       A road maintenance bond of $40,000.00 in the form of an unconditional bank guarantee to ensure that the surrounding road network is maintained to the satisfaction of the City for the term of the extractive industry.  Those portions of public roads affected by the activities related to the approval shall be maintained to a standard acceptable to the City at cost to the applicant; such bond may be utilised for road maintenance purposes where necessary as a result of the operation. The bond shall be accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner.

4.4       Further to conditions 4.1 - 4.3, the bonds are to be accompanied by an executed legal agreement with the City at the full cost of the owner. The legal agreement shall include:

 

(i)        The ability for the City to be able to use the bond, or part of the bond as appropriate, and any costs to the City including administrative costs of completing or rectifying any outstanding works on site in accordance with  the conditions of this development approval and any further costs.

(ii)       Written authorisation from the owner of the land that the City may enter the site at any time and permit the City to complete or rectify any outstanding work to the satisfaction of the City.

 

On-Going Conditions:

5.         The works undertaken to satisfy Conditions 1 - 4 (inclusive) shall be subsequently maintained for the life of the development including, and in addition to, the following conditions:

 

5.1       The development hereby approved shall be limited to: the extraction of limestone from the site; screening of material; crushing; associated drainage works; and rehabilitation works. 

5.2       Notwithstanding Condition 5.1 above, working hours within the pit area, including crushing and transportation of materials shall be restricted to the hours between: 7.00am and 5.00pm Mondays to Fridays; 7.00am and 1.00pm Saturdays for rehabilitation works only; and at no time on Sundays or public holidays.

5.3       The designated haulage route is to be along the northern fork of Ludlow Park Road turning only south along Ludlow Road North and then in either a westerly or easterly direction along Tuart Drive.

5.4       Trucks are not to operate on Monday to Friday between the hours of 7.30am and 9.00am and between 3.00pm and 4.30pm on any given school day on a school bus route (Ludlow Road North and Tuart Drive), or between other times as agreed in writing between the applicant and the local government.

5.5       A maximum number of 10 truck movements (i.e. 10 trucks entering and 10 trucks exiting the site) shall be permitted on the operating days and times as permitted per Condition 5.2 and 5.4 above. 

5.6       No more than 2 hectares shall be worked at any one time; this area shall then be rehabilitated in accordance with the approved details pursuant to Condition 3.2 concurrently with the extraction of the following 2 hectare area.

5.7       The lowest level of excavation shall always be a minimum of at least 300mm above the maximum water table level and no dewatering works are to be undertaken. The City is to be notified within 24 hours if the water table is intercepted.

5.8       Further to condition 5.7, the final land surface (after rehabilitation for horticulture) shall be 1 metre above the maximum seasonal groundwater level. The pit is to be rehabilitated with clean free draining fill overlain by topsoil.

5.9       The following minimum setback from extractive activities shall be achieved at all times:

>   20 metres to the south-eastern and south-western lot boundaries;

5.10    The approved Dust Management Plan shall be implemented and carried out in accordance with the approval details.

5.11    The Noise Management Plan required to satisfy condition 3.3 above shall be implemented and carried out in accordance with the approval details.

5.12    Extractive within 300m of Quindalup Coast land system soils as depicted in the mapping from the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia’s Land Resources Series, report No 5 titled “Busselton, Margaret River, Augusta Land Capability Study” and Figure 6 - Land Systems and Soil Types from Busselton Wetlands shall not occur during Black Swan nesting peak times and shall only occur during Summer and Autumn (1 December through until 31 May).

5.13    No hydrocarbons (fuels, oils, lubricants etc) shall be stored within the pit area.  All refuelling and maintenance must be carried outside of the pit area in bunded areas.

5.14    No vegetation is to be removed as part of the extractive activities hereby approved without first obtaining approval from the City. 

5.15    No dewatering of the extraction area shall be permitted without prior approval from the City and Department of Water.

5.16    The applicant must submit to the City, annually and within 3 (three) months of the anniversary of this approval a report detailing the following:

a)     Survey conducted by a licensed surveyor certifying;

-  The extent/size and location of the area which has been extracted;

-  The extent/size and location of the areas which has been rehabilitated;

-  The extent/size and location of the area which is currently under operation;

b)     Details as to which conditions of this development approval have been complied with and how this has been achieved; and

c)      Details as to which conditions of this development approval have not been complied with and the reasons for such non-compliance (“Compliance Report”).

5.17    In addition to the above, prior to the applicant commencing construction on a new cell a report is to be submitted to the City detailing the following:

a)   Finished ground level in AHD of the cell post extractive activities (Refer to condition 5.7);

b)  Finished ground level in AHD of the cell post rehabilitation (Refer to condition 5.8).

 


Council                                                                                      213                                                      13 September 2017

12.             Engineering and Works Services Report

12.1           PROCLAMATION OF MAIN ROADS - BUSSELL HIGHWAY, NORTHERLY STREET AND WALGER CLOSE

SUBJECT INDEX:

Thoroughfares

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Road networks that provide for a growing population and the safe movement of all users through the District.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Engineering and Facilities Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Land matters

REPORTING OFFICER:

Land and Infrastructure Officer - Andrew Scott

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Engineering and Works Services - Oliver Darby

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Main Roads Western Australia proclamation plans

Attachment b    Overall Development Guide Plan - Vasse Newtown - October 2015  

  

PRÉCIS

 

This report seeks the Council’s endorsement for Main Roads Western Australia proclamation plans 201021-0155-02 and 201621-0101-00 (Attachment A) for the proclamation of a new section of Bussell Highway as a highway; and the de-proclamation of Northerly Street and Walger Close (both formerly Bussell Highway).

 

BACKGROUND

 

During 2015, Main Roads WA constructed a new section of highway around the Vasse development.  Project named ‘The Vasse Bypass’, the new highway was opened 29 January 2016.

 

At a meeting held 11 May 2016, the Council endorsed for the new section of highway to be named ‘Bussell Highway’, and for the ‘Old Bussell Highway’ through the Vasse village to be renamed following a period for public submissions (Council decision C1605/113).  At a subsequent meeting held 14 September 2016, the Council endorsed the names Northerly Street and Walger Close for the ‘Old Bussell Highway’ (Council decision C1609/239).  The new road names were then submitted to and approved by Landgate Geographic Naming.

 

Following the opening of the new section of highway (now known as Bussell Highway), Main Roads WA made road, drainage and other improvements to Northerly Street.  Then by agreement with Main Roads WA, on 1 July 2017 the City accepted the handover of Northerly Street and Walger Close from Main Roads WA.  The agreement includes provision of $97,523 from Main Roads WA to the City for road, drainage and path construction works, to bring the road to a standard suitable to the City’s Engineering and Works Services department.

 

Northerly Street and Walger Close are now assets of the City of Busselton.

 

‘Highways’ and ‘main roads’ are proclaimed as such under the Main Roads Act 1974.  By default, public roads are vested with local government, as a ‘local road’; but after proclamation under the Act, roads are vested with the Commissioner for Main Roads.  De-proclamation is the reversal of the classification of a highway or main road to a local road.

 

Attachment A is are Main Roads WA plans for the section of Bussell Highway to be proclaimed as a highway and for Northerly Street and Walger Close to be de-proclaimed from highway to local roads.  Main Roads WA seeks the Council’s endorsement for the plan.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

·    Main Roads Act 1930 section 13, ‘Proclamation of highways and main roads’

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

Overall Development Guide Plan for Vasse Newtown, endorsed 5 October 2015 (Attachment B), shows the Vasse bypass around the development.  The same guide plan shows the ‘Old Bussell Highway’ (now Northerly Street) passing through a built-up area of commercial, educational and residential zones.  The implication from the guide plan is that the bypass would become the new highway around the development and the old highway through the village centre would become a local road.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

City of Busselton budget for the year ended 30 June 2018 includes provision for the following works:

 

Cost code

Description

Amount

D0016

Vasse Highway drainage works

$22,523

F0076

Vasse Bypass road footpath

$65,000

W0207

Busselton highway pavement deformation

$10,000

 

 

$97,523

 

The works are to be funded by Main Roads WA under the handover agreement of the road asset to the City.

 

Northerly Street and Walger Close have been handed over by Main Roads WA and are now assets of the City.  Budget for roads are part of the City’s road asset management plans.

 

Long-term Financial Plan Implications

 

Nil

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

Key goal area

Community objective

5. Transport – Smart, connective and accessible

5.1 Public transport services that meet the needs of the community.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

Presently, there may be some legal doubt about responsibility for the new section of Bussell Highway, Northerly Street and Walger Close.  Proclamation should negate any doubt.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Nil.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The proclamation of the new section of Bussell Highway around the Vasse development, and the de-proclamation of Northerly Street and Walger Close formalises the status of the respective roads under the Main Roads Act 1930 and provides certainty over management responsibility.

 

Proclamation allows the two road authorities (Main Roads WA and the City of Busselton) to assume full care, control and management responsibility of the roads under the overarching legislation for each authority.

 

CONCLUSION

 

The Council should endorse the Main Roads Western Australia proclamation plan 201621-0101-00 (Attachment A) pursuant to the Main Roads Act 1930.

 

OPTIONS

 

The alternative of not endorsing the proclamation plan is not recommended this may leave doubt about the management responsibility of the new section of Bussell Highway around the Vasse development and Northerly Street and Walger Close.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

A signed copy of the proclamation plan may be forwarded to Main Roads WA within a month of the publishing of the minutes of the Council decision.

 

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That, pursuant to the Main Roads Act 1930, the Council endorses Main Roads Western Australia proclamation plans 201021-0155-02 and 201621-0101-00 (Attachment A) showing:

 

1.    the proclamation of the new section of Bussell Highway around the Vasse development as a highway; and

 

2.    the de-proclamation of Northerly Street and Walger Close as a highway.

 

 


Council

216

13 September 2017

12.1

Attachment a

Main Roads Western Australia proclamation plans

 


 


Council

217

13 September 2017

12.1

Attachment b

Overall Development Guide Plan - Vasse Newtown - October 2015

 

 


Council                                                                                      222                                                      13 September 2017

13.             Community and Commercial Services Report

13.1           DRAFT LIBRARY SERVICES STRATEGY 2017-2027

SUBJECT INDEX:

Library Operations

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

A community with access to a range of cultural and art, social and recreational facilities and experiences.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Community Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

Library Services

REPORTING OFFICER:

Manager, Community Services - Maxine Palmer

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Community and Commercial Services - Naomi Searle

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Draft Library Strategy 2017-2027  

  

PRÉCIS

In response to significant changes at a State Library level and at local community level a strategy for library services has been developed to guide and set the priority focus areas for the growth and development of library services over the next ten (10) years.

 

Further to a recent Council briefing, this report seeks Council’s consideration to approve the advertising of the Library Services Strategy for a period of 21 days and subject to any feedback received, adopt the Library Services Strategy 2017-2027 as a guide for future planning.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Changes affecting library services have been recognised for some time. Extensive research and consultation has been conducted by the Public Library Service of Western Australia (PLWA) in partnership with the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) in order to develop a strategic plan for library services in WA. The Research and Consultation Findings Report was released in June 2015. The report groups findings into four key areas: Integrated Planning, Good Governance, Best Value Service Delivery and Strategic Positioning.

 

The Research and Consultation Findings report led to the development of Vision 2025 and the Framework for Strategic Action PLWA. The PLWA Vision for library services in Western Australia is to “Build connection, creativity and learning,” by a focus on four areas: Building capacity and fostering community engagement, promoting learning and literacy, preserving, sharing and celebrating our rich heritage and inspiring new ideas and creativity.

 

The Research and Consultation Findings report, the Vision 2025 Framework, a local community survey and the City of Busselton’s Economic and Demographic Profile 2016 have informed the development of a local library services strategy for the City of Busselton.

 

On 9 August 2017, Council were provided with an overview of the draft Library Services Strategy 2017-2027 which included the key drivers for changes, survey results, alignment to other key strategies and the goals and strategies that have been developed to integrate with future planning and delivery of library services with Business Plans, Long Term Financial Plans and Workforce Plans.

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

The Library Board of Western Australia Act 1951-1983 specifies the funding arrangement between the Minister for Culture and the Arts and WALGA for Western Australian Public Libraries.

 

Library Board Regulations 1985 is the Local Level Agreement for the Delivery of Public Library Services .i.e. the services required to be provided by Local Governments from their Public Libraries.

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

Libraries play a key role in delivering the City’s Social Plan with actions identified in the Youth, Seniors, Cultural Services and Business Industry and Employment sectors including:

 

1.    Improved home care services for seniors via home delivery

2.    Internet services for training and employment opportunities.

3.    learning opportunities for all ages

4.    Helping children have the best start in life by the provision of the Better Beginnings program and school holiday programs.

5.    Collation and development of aboriginal history and other cultures as part of the Libraries Local History Studies.

6.    Support business on the move by the provision of Wi-Fi.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The majority of the strategies contained within the draft Library Services Strategy can be achieved through existing resources.  There are four strategies, which have costs that are not currently forecast in the City’s planning framework, these are:

 

1.    Vehicle for outreach services to Vasse and Provence (staff resources of 0.4FTE to be considered in future workforce planning)

2.    Expansion of, or a purpose built new library and service development for Dunsborough

3.    Expansion of Busselton library

4.    Options for future library services in Vasse, Yalyalup and Ambergate North

 

Subject to the adoption of the Library Services Strategy, these strategies will be considered against other priorities in future reviews of the Long Term Financial Plan.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

The City of Busselton Libraries Strategy supports the City’s vision for a City “where environment, lifestyle and opportunity meet.” In particular libraries contribute to achieving this vision by supporting the following key goal areas:

 

Key Goal Area 1 – COMMUNITY: Welcoming, friendly and healthy.

Libraries are accessible to everyone and by connecting people to information, knowledge and services libraries provide the community with access to life-long health and education opportunities.

Key Goal Area 2 - PLACE AND SPACES: Vibrant, attractive and affordable.

By their locations and incorporation in and around other community and business services libraries support the development of vibrant, pedestrian friendly central business districts and village centres.

Key Goal Area 4 – ECONOMY: Diverse, robust and prosperous.

Public libraries make education, training and employment processes accessible to everyone, supporting a better trained and educated workforce with increased opportunity and success in today’s knowledge-based society.

Key Goal Area 6 – LEADERSHIP: Visionary, collaborative and accountable.

Our libraries engage broadly and proactively with the community, collaborate with other libraries and develop successful partnerships with other stakeholders in government, community services and the private sector.

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

There are no identified risks of medium or greater associated with the officer recommendation, with the recommendation serving to mitigate the risks associated with not seeking further public comment prior to the adoption of the Strategy as a guide for future planning.

 

CONSULTATION

 

WALGA and PLWA have consulted extensively with public library staff and Local Government representatives. Consultation with key stakeholders was held in April and May 2015, based on key discussion questions developed in the Public Library Services Background Paper. These discussion questions were derived from research and were informed by consultations organised by WALGA and PLWA with CEOs and professional library staff during late 2014. 55 Local Governments were represented, 24 from metropolitan and 31 form non- metropolitan areas.

 

During April 2016 a library survey was conducted which aimed to attract responses from current users and non-users. The survey was promoted in the media, by advertising, Facebook, City website and displays at the libraries, Naturaliste Community Centre (NCC), Dunsborough shopping centre, Geographe Leisure Centre, ArtGeo Cultural Complex, City’s Customer Service, Busselton Senior Citizen’s Centre, Youth Advisory Council and through Bess Home and Community Care.  A total of 680 valid responses were received.

 

Subject to Council approval of the Officer recommendation the Library Services Strategy 2017-2027 will be advertised for further public comment in the Council for Community page, in Busselton and Dunsborough library and on the library website and Facebook page.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

Libraries play a vital role in building the capacity of a community by being open and accessible to all regardless of background or stage of life. They inspire and enrich lives, connect people, build literacy, learning and knowledge, preserve and share community history and support the local economy.

 

The need to change and adapt library services and facilities is being accelerated by the increasingly digital world in which we live. Libraries need to keep pace with this change to remain relevant in today’s society, but it is also fundamental that our libraries remain relevant to our local communities. This presents the challenge of maintaining services to high standards whilst establishing the capabilities to respond to growing, changing and new needs.

 

The Library Services Strategy 2017-2027 defines the driving change for our library services at a State Library level and at local community level and considers technological advancements, demographic change and consumer preferences. Planning accessible services for all sectors of an increasingly diverse community is vital with a particular focus on increasing services and service appeal to our Aboriginal and multicultural communities, our aging community and in early year’s development.

Key statistics from the City’s current library services have been analysed which clearly demonstrate the increasing demand for eServices. Strategies have been considered to address the evolution of the virtual library in addition to the maintenance and development of the City’s two physical spaces at Busselton and Dunsborough. 

 

680 responses were received from a current library user and non-library user survey. Information from the survey informed strategies around increasing accessibility to library services.  As work and life patterns change libraries need to be accessible when people are able to use them.   The survey has shown that there is a strong desire to extend current opening hours and days. There will also be an increased need for outreach services and eService provision for remote accessibility. There remains a strong attachment to libraries as a meeting place and social hub and continuing demand for traditional library services and therefore it is important to continue to develop and maintain a diverse, high quality collection that meets local community need.

 

Both physical library spaces are benchmarked against industry standards. Population forecasts for both Busselton and Dunsborough demonstrate the need to expand current facilities in the future to address increased utilisation for libraries as work and study hubs, learning portals, connection points and social hubs within our community. Strategies consider opportunities at both existing libraries to capitalise on existing infrastructure and alternatives such as a new purpose built library at Dunsborough.

 

The future vision for libraries focusses on their importance as community connectors transforming lives through inspiring and enabling learning, innovation, literacy, creativity and change. Underpinning this vision are four key goals to:

 

·    Goal 1 – Establish the library as a connection point for our communities.

·    Goal 2 - Inspire passion for reading, personal growth and learning

·    Goal 3 – Provide spaces for learning, work, play, knowledge exchange and relaxation

·    Goal 4 – Develop collections and services and the skills to deliver them

The majority of the strategies can be achieved by changing focus and doing things differently within existing resources. However, there are four strategies, which have costs that are not currently forecast in the City’s planning framework, these are:

 

1.    Vehicle for outreach services to Vasse and Provence (staff resources of 0.4FTE to be considered in future workforce planning)

2.    Expansion of, or a purpose built new library and service development for Dunsborough

3.    Expansion of Busselton library

4.    Options for future library services in Vasse, Yalyalup and Ambergate North

 

Subject to the adoption of the Library Services Strategy, these strategies will be considered against other priorities in future reviews of the Long Term Financial Plan.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Council is requested to approve the advertising of the Library Services Strategy for a period of 21 days. Subject to any feedback the Strategy will be adopted and consideration given against other priorities in future reviews of the Long Term Financial Plan.

 

OPTIONS

 

Council could determine that sufficient consultation has been undertaken already and may choose to adopt the Strategy for future planning without further feedback.

 

Council could seek specific changes to the Strategy prior to any further consultation or adoption.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

Subject to Council approval, the Library Services Strategy will be advertised for a period of 21 days as soon as practicable. It is proposed that Council adopts the Strategy for public comment but if there are any adverse comments the strategy will be the subject of a further report to Council.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 That the Council:

 

1. Approves the advertising of the Library Services Strategy 2017-2027 for a period of 21 days for public comment and, if there are no adverse objections, adopts the Strategy; and

2. The contents of the strategy be considered in future reviews of the City of Busselton’s Long Term Financial Plan.

 

 

 


Council

231

13 September 2017

13.1

Attachment a

Draft Library Strategy 2017-2027

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


Council                                                                                      264                                                      13 September 2017

14.             Finance and Corporate Services Report

Nil


Council                                                                                      266                                                      13 September 2017

15.             Chief Executive Officer's Report

15.1           COUNCILLORS' INFORMATION BULLETIN

SUBJECT INDEX:

Councillors' Information

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Executive Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

 Governance Systems

REPORTING OFFICER:

Reporting Officers - Various   

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Chief Executive Officer - Mike Archer

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Simple Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Planning Applications received by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017

Attachment b    Planning Applications determined by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017

Attachment c    Current Status of State Administrative Tribunal Appeals

Attachment d   Local Planning Scheme No. 21 - Amendment 1

Attachment e    Local Planning Scheme No. 21 - Amendment 22

Attachment f    CapeROC Minutes - 18 August 2017  

  

PRÉCIS

 

This report provides an overview of a range of information that is considered appropriate to be formally presented to the Council for its receipt and noting. The information is provided in order to ensure that each Councillor, and the Council, is being kept fully informed, while also acknowledging that these are matters that will also be of interest to the community.

 

Any matter that is raised in this report as a result of incoming correspondence is to be dealt with as normal business correspondence, but is presented in this bulletin for the information of the Council and the community.

 

INFORMATION BULLETIN

15.1.1    Planning & Development Services Statistics

 

Attachment A is a report detailing all Planning Applications received by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017. 56 formal applications were received during this period.

 

Attachment B is a report detailing all Planning Applications determined by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017. A total of 33 applications (including subdivision referrals) were determined by the City during this period with 33 approved / supported and 0 refused / not supported.

15.1.2    State Administrative Tribunal Appeals

 

Attachment C is a list showing the current status of State Administrative Tribunal

Appeals involving the City of Busselton as at 24 August, 2017.

 

Scheme Amendments

15.1.3    Scheme Amendment No.1

 

Attachment D

The Scheme Amendment was published in the Western Australian Government Gazette on the 4 August, 2017.

 

The purpose of this amendment is to amend the Scheme Text and Scheme Maps as outlined in the amendment.

15.1.4    Scheme Amendment No.22

 

Attachment E

The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure has refused to grant final approval to the

above Scheme Amendment for the following reasons:

 

1.   The proposed increase in residential density proposed by the amendment is ad hoc and not supported by the current strategic planning framework for the locality. In particular, the City’s draft Local Planning Strategy identifies the subject land outside the urban consolidation area and where increases in density are considered inconsistent with the urban consolidation criteria outlined in the Strategy;

2.   The proposed site specific increase in density pre‐empts the Local Planning Strategy’s required strategic planning investigation into ‘broad scale up‐coding’ of residential densities.

3.   In has not been demonstrated that the proposed increase in density will not impact adversely upon the character and amenity of the Quindalup Special Character Area, or that this site specific recoding will not establish an undesirable precedent for further amendments, resulting in a cumulative impact upon the area.

4.   The increase in density and the resultant potential to double the dwelling yield on the site is considered inconsistent and incompatible with protecting the site’s vegetation/Western Ringtail Possum habitat.

5.   The amendment has not addressed coastal hazard risk management and if any adaptation planning measures would be required to be implemented as specified in State Planning Policy No.2.6 – State Coastal Planning Policy (2003).

15.1.5    CapeROC Minutes 18 August 2017

 

Attachment F is the CapeROC minutes for the meeting held on 18 August 2017.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

That the items from the Councillors’ Information Bulletin be noted:

·    15.1.1              Planning & Development Services Statistics

·    15.1.2              State Administrative Tribunal Appeals

·    15.1.3              Scheme Amendment No.1

·    15.1.4              Scheme Amendment No.22

·    15.1.5              CapeROC Minutes 18 August 2017

 

 

 


Council

272

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment a

Planning Applications received by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017

 


 


 


 


 


 


Council

275

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment b

Planning Applications determined by the City between 1 August, 2017 and 15 August, 2017

 


 


 


 


Council

277

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment c

Current Status of State Administrative Tribunal Appeals

 


 


Council

279

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment d

Local Planning Scheme No. 21 - Amendment 1

 


Council

280

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment e

Local Planning Scheme No. 21 - Amendment 22

 


Council

281

13 September 2017

15.1

Attachment f

CapeROC Minutes - 18 August 2017

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council                                                                                      300                                                      13 September 2017

15.2           CapeROC- REVIEW OF THE TERMS OF REFERENCE

SUBJECT INDEX:

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE:

Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

BUSINESS UNIT:

Governance Services

ACTIVITY UNIT:

 

REPORTING OFFICER:

Strategic Projects Officer - Tracey King

AUTHORISING OFFICER:

Director, Finance and Corporate Services - Cliff Frewing

VOTING REQUIREMENT:

Absolute Majority

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment a   Terms of Reference - CapeROC reviewed 18 August 2017  

  

PRÉCIS

 

The Terms of Reference (ToR) for CapeROC last updated 21 October 2013 were reviewed by the CapeROC Committee at its meeting 18 August 2017. The revised ToR are now required to be adopted by the individual Councils of the City of Busselton and the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River.

 

Council is requested to adopt the attached updated ToR.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The City of Busselton is currently undertaking a review of all ToR for Committees of Council. The current CapeROC ToR last reviewed and updated October 2013 were presented to the CapeROC committee at its 18 August 2017 meeting for review. CapeROC have revised and endorsed the ToR to be presented to each individual Council for adoption.

 

CAPEROC RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL

CAP1708/005 Moved Councillor F Haynes, seconded Councillor J McCallum

That CapeROC endorse the following changes to the Terms of Reference: (Attachment A)

 

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

 

The Capes Regional Organisation of Councils (CapeROC) is a voluntary committee of the City of Busselton and Shire of Augusta-Margaret River, formed to enhance the capacity of both local governments to deliver social, economic and environmental benefits to their communities and the Capes region.  CapeROC, as a voluntary organisation of Councils, has no formal statutory authority under the Local Government Act 1995, and as such operates under a Terms of Reference, agreed to by each individual Council.

 

RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES

 

The ToR states:

 

10.0 Amendment to the Terms of Reference

This document may be altered at any time by the two Councils jointly passing a motion of their respective Councils on the recommendation of the CapeROC, or independently by joint decision of the two Councils.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Each year, the Shire of Augusta Margaret River and the City of Busselton allocate up to $50,000 of their respective budgets (up to $100,000 in total) towards CapeROC approved regional economic development initiatives.  The ToR provides the mechanism for projects that meet the stated objectives of the CapeROC Committee to be funded from this budget allocation.

 

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES

 

This report refers to the ToR that the CapeROC committee operates, so therefore aligns mostly to the City of Busselton Key Goal Area 6.1 Governance systems, process and practices are responsible, ethical and transparent.

 

The CapeROC committee has been formed to enhance the capacity of both the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River and the City of Busselton to deliver social, economic and environmental benefits to their communities in collaboration, in accordance with the Objectives agreed to within the ToR.  These Objectives have broad relevance to several other key goal areas within the Strategic Community Plan including:

 

·    1.2 A community with access to life-long health and education opportunities;

·    1.3 A community with access to a range of cultural and art, social and recreational facilities and experiences;

·    2.1 Planning strategies that foster the development of healthy neighbourhoods that meet our needs as we grow;

·    3.2 Natural areas and habitats are cared for and enhanced for the enjoyment of current and future generations;

·    3.1 Development is managed sustainably and our environment valued;

·    4.1 An innovative and diversified economy that provides a variety of business and employment opportunities as well as consumer choice;

·    4.2 A community where local business is supported and in turn drives our economy;

·    4.3 Events and unique tourism experiences that attract visitors and investment;

·    5.2 Road networks that provide for a growing population and the safe movement of all users through the District.

 

RISK ASSESSMENT

 

An assessment of the potential risks of implementing the Officers recommendation was undertaken and as a result, no risks were rated as ‘medium’ or above were identified.

 

CONSULTATION

 

The ToR have been reviewed, updated and endorsed by CapeROC at its meeting 18 August 2017 with input from relevant staff of both local governments.

 

The Shire of Augusta-Margaret River will also consider adoption of the updated ToR. Both the City of Busselton and Shire of Augusta-Margaret River are requested to advise CapeROC of the outcome of this consideration prior to the next meeting to be held Thursday 23 November 2017.

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

The CapeROC Committee ToR have recently have been reviewed and the following updates were unanimously endorsed by CapeROC to better reflect current administration and objectives of the Committee. 

 

The following changes have been proposed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The updated document not showing tracked changes is provided at Attachment A.

 

The revised changes are required to be adopted by both the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River and the City of Busselton, by absolute majority.

 

CONCLUSION

 

CapeROC has reviewed the ToR and has made minor changes to best reflect current administration practises and objectives of the Committee. Before these ToR can take effect, both Councils of the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River and the City of Busselton are required to adopt the updates by absolute majority. The revised ToR are provided at attachment A for Council adoption.

 

OPTIONS

 

Council can choose to either adopt the revised Terms of Reference or not.

 

TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

 

Both the City of Busselton and Shire of Augusta Margaret River are requested to advise CapeROC of the outcome of this consideration prior to the next meeting to be held Thursday 23 November 2017.

 

OFFICER RECOMMENDATION

ABSOLUTE MAJORITY DECISION OF COUNCIL REQUIRED

 

That Council adopt the Capes Region organisation of Councils (CapeROC) Terms of Reference, reviewed by CapeROC at its meeting 18 August 2017 provided as Attachment A.

 


Council

305

13 September 2017

15.2

Attachment a

Terms of Reference - CapeROC reviewed 18 August 2017

 


 


 

 


Council                                                                                      308                                                      13 September 2017

16.             Motions of which Previous Notice has been Given

16.1           Amendment to the 2017/18 budget to co-fund extensions to the John Edward Pavillion 

Mayor Grant Henley has given notice that at the Council meeting on 13 September 2017, he will move the following motion:

 

 

MOTION

 

That the Council:

1.    Approves a budget amendment for a contribution of $100,000 from the Infrastructure Development Reserve to co-fund the extension to the John Edwards Pavilion at the Dunsborough Playing Fields (within the 2017/18 Budget).

2.    Delegates authority to the CEO to enter into negotiations with the Dunsborough Sharks Football Club for a lease for the John Edward’s Pavilion, including provisions that ensure reasonable access for other user groups including but not limited to netball and an orderly transition to future facilities.

3.    Delegates authority to the CEO to formalise a Funding Agreement with the Dunsborough Sharks Football Club outlining the necessary terms and conditions to be granted the $100,000 contribution including the required acquittal process.

3.    Requires the CEO to review Active Public Open Space in Dunsborough to ensure orderly planning of built infrastructure prior to entering into the funding agreement.

 

 

COUNCILLOR COMMENT

 

The John Edwards Pavilion is an inadequate and tired community asset that requires an upgrade. The request by the new combined Dunsborough AFL club represents an opportunity to increase clubroom space that will meet the immediate needs of the clubs until such time as a facility is developed as planned at Lot 10 in the future. At that time the existing facility may be surrendered to meet the needs of the remaining user groups or for other uses and will not become redundant infrastructure.

 

BACKGROUND

 

On 7 August 2017, the Mayor and Manager for Community Services met with representatives from the Dunsborough Sharks Football Club (DFC), Redmond Sweeney, Acting President and Evan Williams, Club Member and appointed Architectural Draftsman, to be presented with a proposal to extend the John Edward Pavilion (JEP) at the Naturaliste Community Centre (NCC) at Dunsborough Lakes Playing Fields. (See Attachment D Location Plan).

 

The DFC is a collective of the Dunsborough Sharks (Juniors), the Dunsborough-Yallingup Mulies (Mens), the Dunsborough Ducks (Masters), and the Dunsborough Dragon Slayers (Womens). They have a total 390 registered players this season. Club representatives explained how growth in football, other sports, spectators and the local population now means the John Edward Pavilion is no longer large enough to accommodate current or future community needs.  A key issue is the lack of a large undercover area for players; especially the juniors and their families, to shelter from the inclement weather experienced playing winter sport. A suitably sized pavilion is also a priority for most clubs to hold fundraising activities the proceeds from which are reinvested back into the Clubs for their future sustainability. Currently, clubs have to hire other venues away from their playing grounds to hold these events.

The Football Club proposed a 12m by 10m extension of the JEP clubroom facility which could be approached in two stages. The first being a freestanding veranda over a concrete hardstand area, which the Club could finance themselves as an interim quick fix. At a later stage, the Club proposed the sides could be enclosed with doors and windows added, the existing exterior wall knocked through, the bar relocated and the kitchen upgraded to commercial standard. (See attachments B and C for the proposed concept design and floor plan). The Club requested the City consider funding stage two or co-fund the total project in one stage. Completing the total project in one stage would achieve efficiencies in the build cost and timeframes and meet all the Clubs immediate needs in time for the 2018 season. The Club have estimated a total project cost of $200,000, which includes $40,000 of in kind support from the Club and $60,000 cash.

 

In a letter dated 18 August 2047, the Club’s proposal was outlined in a formal request for funding (Attachment A).

 

OFFICER COMMENT

 

Whilst Officers acknowledge, the circumstances for receipt of this proposal and funding request are unusual in that they have not transpired through any funding program consultation such as Community Bids or CSRFF, and therefore are not currently considered in the City’s Long term Financial Plan, the proposal presents an opportunity to address an immediate need in a short timeframe, prior to the next football season, from appropriate reserve funds.

 

The Club’s feedback about the JEP also supports a recently commissioned asset condition assessment and user consultation undertaken for the Naturaliste Community Centre (NCC) masterplan which identified the JEP can no longer adequately service the needs of the numerous groups which utilise the Dunsborough ovals and NCC complex.

 

Whilst there are future plans to build new ovals, clubrooms and associated facilities in Dunsborough Lakes at Lot 10 Commonage Road, the first oval is planned to be developed in 2018/19, but the development of the further two ovals and shared clubhouse are some years away.  Whilst it is expected that Football will move to the new sporting complex,  netball, basketball, cricket and soccer, all of which are also growth sports, are likely to remain at the current site. Based on this, and given the current demands associated with the existing playing fields, the future growth of other sporting groups and the current unusable condition of the JEP, Officers support the proposed expansion to meet the immediate needs of the Dunsborough community.

 

An expanded JEP shared with other clubs, including Basketball, Netball, Yallingup Boardriders and the Smiths Beach Surf Lifesaving Club (proposed in the letter), will be a well utilised addition to Dunsborough community facilities.  The extension will not only cater for immediate needs, it will also be utilised by other sporting associations or clubs who will utilise the existing playing fields when Lot 10 Commonage Road is fully developed and operational.  Further, opportunities also exist to repurpose the facility in line with future planning for the NCC and the surrounding area.

 

Currently there is $2.03m in the New Infrastructure Development Reserve, which is anticipated to be reduced to $1.54m by the end of financial year as a result of planned infrastructure development works that could be utilised to co-fund the extension up to $100,000.  The Council could also consider allocating funds through the October 2017 Community Bid funding round noting that the total budget available is $91,860 and that it is likely to be a competitive round with other community priorities. The Council could also consider requesting the Dunsborough AFL club make an application in the February 2018 CSRFF grants round, however this would mean the Club’s timeframes to have the extensions complete prior to the 2018 season would not be achievable.

 

Attachments

Attachment a   Proposed extension to JEP letter from Club

Attachment b    Concept Plan - Proposed Extension to John Edwards Pavilion

Attachment c    Concept Floor Plan - Proposed Extension to John Edwards Pavilion  

 


Council

311

13 September 2017

16.1

Attachment a

Proposed extension to JEP letter from Club

 

18th August 2017

Grant Henley

Mayor

City of Busselton

BUSSELTON  WA  6280

 

Dear Grant

 

RE: CO FUNDING APPLICATION WITH THE DUNSBOROUGH FOOTBALL CLUB (DFC)

 

Firstly we appreciate your interest in considering this worthy project.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The DFC is a collective of the Dunsborough Sharks (Juniors), the Dunsborough-Yallingup Mulies (Mens), the Dunsborough Ducks (Masters), and the Dunsborough Dragon Slayers (Womens). The juniors have 390 registered players this season. When you couple this with the parents and volunteers and the participants in the senior levels, we have close to 600 users of the oval and related facilities during a winter week.

 

The Naturaliste locality has nearly a 7000 head of population according to the 2011 ABS statistics and is 25% of the City’s population.  The 2016 census data shows a 30% increase since 2011 for the Dunsborough node. This locality, like Busselton and surrounds, has a higher population of youth (up to 15 years old) in comparison to the state averages. The demands on sporting facilities are something you are all too familiar with.

 

The John Edwards Pavilion (JEP) has been overgrown by the sporting community. The open area for events is 60 square metres and is inadequate. The extension will add 120 square metres, tripling the current indoor hosting space.

 

BENEFITS

 

This new space will provide more appropriate facilities to serve the sporting community need. Fundraising events can now be conducted at the JEP to continue to make these clubs sustainable. No longer holding events at the Pub, Clancey’s, the Lakes Tavern etc will be necessary and will provide the ability to re-invest into sport (eg; equipment etc) via more profitable events.

 

So often grandparents come down to winter sports to watch their grand children play and are forced to sit in their cars as there is no shelter during inclement weather. The extension will provide a better viewing opportunity and shelter.

 

These benefits will be shared with other clubs, including Bastketball (over 350 participants), Netball, Yallingup Boardriders and the Smiths Beach Surf Lifesaving club. We are currently evaluating management arrangements to ensure they would be co beneficiaries of this extension. We are in the process of receiving these letters of support. 

 

In light of the future planning of sporting within the Naturaliste precinct, in particular Lot 10, the extension to the JEP is a building will always have relevance, as long as there is grass at the Dunsborough Playing Fields.

 

COSTS

 

According to Evan Williams, our Architectural Draftsman, he estimates according to benchmark rates, he expects a project cost of $170,000 - $210,000. We have chosen to set a budget of $200,000 to complete stage 1 and 2 simultaneously.

 

Currently, the DFC has raised and pulled from retained earnings, cash of $60,000 for this extension. We have also received commitment from trades and builders of $40,000 “in-kind” for the project.

 

We are requesting matching funding from the CoB of $100,000 so we can complete stage 1 and 2 simultaneously, and deliver a significant sporting benefit to the users within Naturaliste.

 

TENURE

 

We will also be applying for grants, namely the Department of Sport and Recreation, West Australian Football Commission and Holden. These applications which will look to contribute towards the fit out, requires evidence of tenure. This requires the DFC securing a long term lease, an agenda item that has been in the air for some time since the dissolution of the NSC.

 

Thank you for your consideration on this important matter.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

Redmond Sweeny

Acting President – Dunsborough Sharks FC.


Council

313

13 September 2017

16.1

Attachment b

Concept Plan - Proposed Extension to John Edwards Pavilion

 


Council

314

13 September 2017

16.1

Attachment c

Concept Floor Plan - Proposed Extension to John Edwards Pavilion

 

  


Council                                                                                      315                                                      13 September 2017

17.             Confidential Reports  

Nil

18.             Questions from Members  

19.             Public Question Time

20.             Next Meeting Date

Wednesday, 27 September 2017

21.             Closure